*** 2026 Aggie Softball Season Thread ***

125,567 Views | 869 Replies | Last: 15 hrs ago by Boozer92
TravelinTex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Would assume it tells the same story. We had an All-American pitcher in the circle that made up most of the work load all season and dominated lesser competition in non conference play last year vs playing half of the top 15 with mostly underclassmen and a senior rebounding from injury. Figured you'd have time to look that up yourself since you have time to be so miserable.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

Anyone with a clue knew our pitching would not be as good. We lost our ace and were unable to sign a replacement. I am not sure what you thought was going to happen.
_mpaul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cevans_40 said:

_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

Anyone with a clue knew our pitching would not be as good. We lost our ace and were unable to sign a replacement. I am not sure what you thought was going to happen.

Easy there, Tiger.
_mpaul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TravelinTex said:

Would assume it tells the same story. We had an All-American pitcher in the circle that made up most of the work load all season and dominated lesser competition in non conference play last year vs playing half of the top 15 with mostly underclassmen and a senior rebounding from injury. Figured you'd have time to look that up yourself since you have time to be so miserable.

Why would you think I'm miserable?
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TravelinTex said:

Interesting stat drop from Kay! Assuming the dynamic is quality of opponents early in the season this year compared to last. Still don't think this team is as bad as their record indicates. Have been in competitive situations vs tough opponents, they just need to find ways to win.



I want to run the numbers on 2025 vs 2026 scoring while adding in the element of the competition. I'll do that this evening. My gut tells me that while in total it looks the same, the difference this year is we are scoring less against top 25 competition while running it up more against the bad teams.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

2025 2026

Hits/g 5.52 5.21
BB/g 1.67 1.39
R/g 2.43 3.48
ER/g 1.67 2.83

Biggest difference I found was Homeruns allowed. 5 allowed in pre conference last year 20 this year. So even with fewer hits and walks allowed per game more runs scored.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Although offensively we have hit 33 hr this year and only 19 in preconference last year

So 14 more hit and 15 more allowed
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2025 vs preconference ranked opponents

W vs Baylor 10-7
L vs OK St 5-6
W at FSU 6-3(8)
W at FSU 11-4
L vs Texas Tech 2-7
W vs Texas Tech 7-6

Runs/game 6.83 Runs allowed/game 5.5

2026 vs preconference ranked opponents

L vs Texas Tech 2-3
L vs OK St 8-9
L vs Duke 6-8
L vs Oregon 1-2
W vs Duke 11-5
L vs Nebraska 2-8
L vs UCLA 7-15

Runs/game 5.29 Runs allowed/game 7.14

The real killers from this start are the losses to Louisiana and Texas St

_mpaul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boozer92 said:

_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

2025 2026

Hits/g 5.52 5.21
BB/g 1.67 1.39
R/g 2.43 3.48
ER/g 1.67 2.83

Biggest difference I found was Homeruns allowed. 5 allowed in pre conference last year 20 this year. So even with fewer hits and walks allowed per game more runs scored.

Interesting. So slightly better on hits and walks per game, but significantly worse on runs and earned runs per game, the latter of which is consistent with someone's prior stats about how drastically different our pitching was between top tier competition and the rest of the teams.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
_mpaul said:

Boozer92 said:

_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

2025 2026

Hits/g 5.52 5.21
BB/g 1.67 1.39
R/g 2.43 3.48
ER/g 1.67 2.83

Biggest difference I found was Homeruns allowed. 5 allowed in pre conference last year 20 this year. So even with fewer hits and walks allowed per game more runs scored.

Interesting. So slightly better on hits and walks per game, but significantly worse on runs and earned runs per game. Consistent with someone's prior stats about how drastically different our pitching was between top tier competition and the rest of the teams.

Not sure how you are correlating those things but okay.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boozer92 said:

2025 vs preconference ranked opponents

W vs Baylor 10-7
L vs OK St 5-6
W at FSU 6-3(8)
W at FSU 11-4
L vs Texas Tech 2-7
W vs Texas Tech 7-6

Runs/game 6.83 Runs allowed/game 5.5

2026 vs preconference ranked opponents

L vs Texas Tech 2-3
L vs OK St 8-9
L vs Duke 6-8
L vs Oregon 1-2
W vs Duke 11-5
L vs Nebraska 2-8
L vs UCLA 7-15

Runs/game 5.29 Runs allowed/game 7.14

The real killers from this start are the losses to Louisiana and Texas St


Thanks for calculating that. I was interested in that subset of information on the offense for sure and you also added the runs allowed against those high quality opponents too.

So, in summary, versus top 25 opponents, this year we are scoring 1.54 runs per game less and allowing 1.64 per game more for a total swing in the negative of 3.18 runs per game.

Here is what I was going to calculate and you out did me and added the runs allowed too.

Runs per game vs top 25 (end of non-conference season):
2025: 6.83
2026: 5.29

Runs per game vs non-top 25 (end of non-conference season):
2025: 7.69
2026: 8.33

So far, we are also beating up on the non-top 25 a bit more this year than last year.

Perhaps, a lesson here is that we can hit and score, but we haven't learned how to do that against the high quality top 25 teams yet. But, it doesn't mean that can't come.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
_mpaul said:

Boozer92 said:

_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

2025 2026

Hits/g 5.52 5.21
BB/g 1.67 1.39
R/g 2.43 3.48
ER/g 1.67 2.83

Biggest difference I found was Homeruns allowed. 5 allowed in pre conference last year 20 this year. So even with fewer hits and walks allowed per game more runs scored.

Interesting. So slightly better on hits and walks per game, but significantly worse on runs and earned runs per game. Consistent with someone's prior stats about how drastically different our pitching was between top tier competition and the rest of the teams.

It has been 2 weeks since I did that, so here is an update thru the current:

ERA - Overall
Sparks (18 1/3 IP, 6 ER) - 2.29 ERA
Lessentine (54 IP, 19 ER) - 2.46 ERA
Peters (49 2/3 IP, 18 ER) - 2.54 ERA
Munnerlyn (18 1/3 IP, 11 ER) - 4.20 ERA
Pannell (14 1/3 IP, 15 ER) - 7.33 ERA

ERA - vs Non-25 Opponents
Lessentine (41 2/3 IP, 7 ER) - 1.18 ERA
Peters (28 1/3 IP, 6 ER) - 1.48 ERA
Munnerlyn (11 1/3 IP, 3 ER) - 1.85 ERA
Pannell (11 1/3 IP, 3 ER) - 1.85 ERA
Sparks (16 1/3 IP, 6 ER) - 2.57 ERA

ERA - vs Top 25 Opponents
Sparks (2 IP, 0 ER) - 0.00 ERA
Peters (21 1/3 IP, 12 ER) - 3.94 ERA
Lessentine 12 1/3 IP, 12 ER) - 6.81 ERA
Munnerlyn (7 IP, 8 ER) - 8.00 ERA
Pannell (3 IP, 12 ER) - 28.00 ERA

Team ERA - Overall: 3.10

Team ERA - vs Non-Top 25: 1.59
Team ERA - vs Top 25: 6.74

Also, of note when pulling this together. 19% (16 of the 85) of the runs we have allowed this year are unearned. So, there is a defensive element that can get overlooked when just looking at the runs allowed and thinking pitching.

fitzwatema
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The biggest disappointment for me has been Taylor Pannell, I thought she would come in and be lockdown reliver. Sidne Peters has been good and it seems like Lessentine is maybe putting to much pressure on herself. Bottom line offense and defense are going to have to be rock solid if the pitching doesn't get better.
Jdb101808
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fitzwatema said:

The biggest disappointment for me has been Taylor Pannell, I thought she would come in and be lockdown reliver. Sidne Peters has been good and it seems like Lessentine is maybe putting to much pressure on herself. Bottom line offense and defense are going to have to be rock solid if the pitching doesn't get better.

Hopefully she can get it going.. I do like what she has on her glove... one side says PROVE EM WRONG and the other FAFO... so maybe she will take note and get it rockin
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:



Also, of note when pulling this together. 19% (16 of the 85) of the runs we have allowed this year are unearned. So, there is a defensive element that can get overlooked when just looking at the runs allowed and thinking pitching.



Last year in pre conference 16 of the 51 runs (31%) were unearned. So either a slight improvement or different scorekeeping determining between hit or error. That is a surprisingly high unearned run percentage
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow. I would never have guessed it that high as "the norm" but perhaps it is.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

_mpaul said:

Boozer92 said:

_mpaul said:

But what about pitching stats?

2025 2026

Hits/g 5.52 5.21
BB/g 1.67 1.39
R/g 2.43 3.48
ER/g 1.67 2.83

Biggest difference I found was Homeruns allowed. 5 allowed in pre conference last year 20 this year. So even with fewer hits and walks allowed per game more runs scored.

Interesting. So slightly better on hits and walks per game, but significantly worse on runs and earned runs per game. Consistent with someone's prior stats about how drastically different our pitching was between top tier competition and the rest of the teams.

It has been 2 weeks since I did that, so here is an update thru the current:

ERA - Overall
Sparks (18 1/3 IP, 6 ER) - 2.29 ERA
Lessentine (54 IP, 19 ER) - 2.46 ERA
Peters (49 2/3 IP, 18 ER) - 2.54 ERA
Munnerlyn (18 1/3 IP, 11 ER) - 4.20 ERA
Pannell (14 1/3 IP, 15 ER) - 7.33 ERA

ERA - vs Non-25 Opponents
Lessentine (41 2/3 IP, 7 ER) - 1.18 ERA
Peters (28 1/3 IP, 6 ER) - 1.48 ERA
Munnerlyn (11 1/3 IP, 3 ER) - 1.85 ERA
Pannell (11 1/3 IP, 3 ER) - 1.85 ERA
Sparks (16 1/3 IP, 6 ER) - 2.57 ERA

ERA - vs Top 25 Opponents
Sparks (2 IP, 0 ER) - 0.00 ERA
Peters (21 1/3 IP, 12 ER) - 3.94 ERA
Lessentine 12 1/3 IP, 12 ER) - 6.81 ERA
Munnerlyn (7 IP, 8 ER) - 8.00 ERA
Pannell (3 IP, 12 ER) - 28.00 ERA

Team ERA - Overall: 3.10

Team ERA - vs Non-Top 25: 1.59
Team ERA - vs Top 25: 6.74

Also, of note when pulling this together. 19% (16 of the 85) of the runs we have allowed this year are unearned. So, there is a defensive element that can get overlooked when just looking at the runs allowed and thinking pitching.



The biggest difference is the level of talent in the circle. Kennedy was really good. Thats the whole story.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SEC Matchups for the weekend

Florida at Kentucky
Ole Miss at Texas
Arkansas at Alabama
Auburn at Oklahoma
Tenn at Miss St
A&M at LSU (Sat Mon)

Missouri, S Carolina out off conference, Georgia off
Stevecstx61
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's shocking because score keepers are very generous in granting hits vs errors
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow. Arizona run ruled Tech 9-0 in 5. All 9 runs off Canady(4ER)
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cevans_40 said:

Gap said:

ERA - vs Top 25 Opponents
Sparks (2 IP, 0 ER) - 0.00 ERA
Peters (21 1/3 IP, 12 ER) - 3.94 ERA
Lessentine 12 1/3 IP, 12 ER) - 6.81 ERA
Munnerlyn (7 IP, 8 ER) - 8.00 ERA
Pannell (3 IP, 12 ER) - 28.00 ERA


The biggest difference is the level of talent in the circle. Kennedy was really good. Thats the whole story.

Kennedy for the same data period last year (so, pre-SEC vs top 25):

Kennedy 2025 - vs pre-SEC schedule, top 25 opponents

Kennedy (20 2/3 IP, 13 ER) - 4.40 ERA.

Surprisingly, Peters has a lower ERA this year and has thrown slightly more innings.
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately the stats don't show the amount of stupid baserunning errors this team has had which are numerous.
frankie00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Press release for LSU series. Includes some 2025 vs 2026 offensive stats at the bottom.

https://12thman.com/news/2026/3/13/no-16-softball-opens-sec-play-at-no-17-lsu

Thanks to those who have posted various stats over the last few days - I really dig it !!
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LSU Series thread

https://texags.com/forums/8/topics/3599585/replies/72026604



SBFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Three players out due to team rules violations?????
Aggie*_86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which three players?
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wark, Pannell and Coleman

Link to Kays tweet in the game thread
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good win. Lets go win the series tomorrow and stay on track for the sweep
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SEC Weekend

Florida swept (at) Kentucky 10-2(6), 9-0(5), 9-0(6)
Texas swept Ole Miss 3-1, 11-2(6), 15-3(5)
Alabama took 2 of 3 from Arkansas 4-1, 9-14, 4-1
Oklahoma swept Auburn 13-5(5), 8-5, 14-2(5)
Tenn took 2 of 3 at Miss St 3-1(9), 0-1, 4-1
A&M took 2 of 3 at LSU 7-2, 3-2, 2-7

Missouri, S Carolina out off conference, Georgia off
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love finding a way to win. The recipe so far this weekend is dominant pitching and taking advantage of your opportunities on offense with timely hitting. Who would have guessed we would be 2-0 with a 11 total hits over the two games (5 hits in game 1 and 6 hits in game 2).
Wooahhhh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The pitching staff looks SEC ready. Lessentine & Peters getting starts in the 1st 2. #7 closing out tonight's game. I wonder if Lessentine will go tomorrow night
TravelinTex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I missed the action this week as I was in and out of Nashville for basketball. Glad to see the girls playing well vs conference opponents. Can't be too high or low on the team, they're good enough to win! Anybody know what happened with the 3 girls that got suspended? That's disappointing news. But they're kids. And they're going to do things they shouldn't despite being student athletes. I have no doubt Coach Ford laid into them and it's good she made it a learning lesson.
SBFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wark played in tonight's game
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wooahhhh said:

The pitching staff looks SEC ready. Lessentine & Peters getting starts in the 1st 2. #7 closing out tonight's game. I wonder if Lessentine will go tomorrow night
Lsu lost 4 straight last month, and 3 straight last wkd. Not sure they're the bar. But if our pitching is legit good enough, then we could make OKC.
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wooahhhh said:

The pitching staff looks SEC ready. Lessentine & Peters getting starts in the 1st 2. #7 closing out tonight's game. I wonder if Lessentine will go tomorrow night

Thanks for that. Now we are gonna give up 10 runs today.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.