Minneapolis getting Hot?

245,484 Views | 3073 Replies | Last: 12 min ago by aggiehawg
aggiedata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump admin X accounts are bold

Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Can we just shorten it to "rats" going forward?

I know it's an insult to actual rats but it seems appropriate.

Or don't offend the rodents and just call them what they are - commies
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

Dear Libs:

Let's say you are right and somehow all these videos of her car making contact with him are false.

The act itself of gunning a vehicle (and you can see the speed of it accelerating away) in the direction of a LEO giving him only a fraction of a second to react then yeah if he decides that his life is being threatened and reacts accordingly with deadly force then 30 years case law says he's in the right and didn't have to wait and see if the vehicle makes contact to respond.

Its the same principal of a perp drawing a gun. LEOs don't have to wait to see if they actually intend to fire it at them or anyone else. They are allowed to simply shoot you first to prevent a POTENTIAL act of violence against them or someone else.

This lady died because she intentionally interfered in LEO investigations, refused to follow lawful commands from LEOs and then tried to flee arrest by LEOs. Her blood is on the hands of all idiot leftists who told her these choices were the right thing to do


Also there's the other officer who had his hands in the window when she started moving forward. Risk of being dragged or going under a wheel. The guy in front being experienced with that has a duty to look out for his fellow officers safety as well using deadly force if necessary. Libs all over the internet are focused on the officer in front of the car "not getting hurt" wrongly (likely purposefully) obfuscating his injury status with whether or not deadly force was permitted.
aggiedata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like something is happening



FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Also there's the other officer who had his hands in the window when she started moving forward. Risk of being dragged or going under a wheel. The guy in front being experienced with that has a duty to look out for his fellow officers safety as well using deadly force if necessary. Libs all over the internet are focused on the officer in front of the car "not getting hurt" wrongly (likely purposefully) obfuscating his injury status with whether or not deadly force was permitted.


Then the guy who made the shoot is really dumb. If we are going to acknowledge a car is a weapon, why on earth did he provide overwatch standing in front of the deadly weapon instead of off to the vehicle's 1 o'clock?
I'm not defending the lady, she was clearly in the wrong, but this officer is tactically inept, moreso since this was his second incident involving a vehicle.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Quote:

Also there's the other officer who had his hands in the window when she started moving forward. Risk of being dragged or going under a wheel. The guy in front being experienced with that has a duty to look out for his fellow officers safety as well using deadly force if necessary. Libs all over the internet are focused on the officer in front of the car "not getting hurt" wrongly (likely purposefully) obfuscating his injury status with whether or not deadly force was permitted.


Then the got who made the shoot is really dumb. If we are going to acknowledge a car is a weapon, why on earth did he provide overwatch standing in front of the deadly weapon instead of off to the vehicle's 1 o'clock?
I'm not defending the lady, she was clearly in the wrong, but this officer is tactically inept, moreso since this was his second incident involving a vehicle.


He was walking around to the driver's side…jfc. He was not providing "over watch "
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was standing in front of the car with a phone in his hand. And if he wasn't providing overwatch, then his position in front of the vehicle is even dumber. No reason to be in that space if a car is a deadly weapon.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiedata said:



At least that will warm it up there...
You can turn off signatures, btw
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That ICE officer is a hero. He saved the lives of two people or at least the risk of bodily injury.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiedata said:

True



I don't believe that's what she said.

I think it was Let's Go Brandon!!!

Yeah...that's probably what it was...
You can turn off signatures, btw
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How? The other two officers had the vehicle covered. At that point, he was a bystander and provided no value other than to almost get hurt…again.
The Unforgiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The car was in park for quite sometime. He probably thought this worthless Karen wasn't stupid enough to drive at him like some hood rat or gang bamger.

If we go with your thinking process, then cops should avoid people with pens and keys since they can be used as a weapon. Just disengage from all criminals since they may kill them.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The car was in park for quite sometime. He probably thought this worthless Karen wasn't stupid enough to drive at him like some hood rat or gang bamger.


Doesn't matter, deadly weapon is still a deadly weapon. Your statement makes him even dumber. Thanks for helping my argument.


The Unforgiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you a cop? Are you a law enforcement trainer? What is your expertise to make you know everything? Do you never walk or stand in front of a car? Do you avoid doing that to all cars? If not you are just as dumb I guess
TxAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Quote:

The car was in park for quite sometime. He probably thought this worthless Karen wasn't stupid enough to drive at him like some hood rat or gang bamger.


Doesn't matter, deadly weapon is still a deadly weapon. Your statement makes him even dumber. Thanks for helping my argument.





Sure hope you are also calling out the stupidity of all the protesters throwing themselves in front of the same deadly weapons... I mean vehicles.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Quote:

The car was in park for quite sometime. He probably thought this worthless Karen wasn't stupid enough to drive at him like some hood rat or gang bamger.


Doesn't matter, deadly weapon is still a deadly weapon. Your statement makes him even dumber. Thanks for helping my argument.





Your argument is he is dumb? Argue away because we will never know, but we know it was self defense and a good shoot.
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not really, there 57 pages of the car is a deadly weapon. One poster even calculated the force. So why was he in front of the vehicle out of any other useful position?

Edit spelling
The Unforgiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does that mean you are okay with anyone running over protestors standing in the road ? Which I do think is should be legal. Your right to protest doesn't override my right to move freely. If you want to protest stay on the sidewalk or on the side of the road.
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Quote:

The car was in park for quite sometime. He probably thought this worthless Karen wasn't stupid enough to drive at him like some hood rat or gang bamger.


Doesn't matter, deadly weapon is still a deadly weapon. Your statement makes him even dumber. Thanks for helping my argument.




The Unforgiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since you're such an expert in law enforcement are you willing to go train ICE to be better?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Not really, there 57 pages of the car is a deadly weapon. One poster even calculated the force. So why was he in front of the vehicle out of any other awful position?


He was walking to the driver side window from the other side, haven't you watched the video from his cell phone?
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure what that has to do with officer standing in front of a deadly weapon with a mobile phone.

Try again.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Unforgiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or do you prefer that comfy couch too much?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Not sure what that has to do with officer standing in front of a deadly weapon with a mobile phone.

Try again.


He was not standing
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Not really, there 57 pages of the car is a deadly weapon. One poster even calculated the force. So why was he in front of the vehicle out of any other useful position?

Edit spelling

Someone never watched the video in slo-mo of the tires turning and spinning out on the snowy ice.
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, I've trained plenty as an Infantry Officer. Somebody else's turn now.

Also, don't think common sense can be trained.

Situational awareness can be and he should learn it.
The Unforgiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just admit you wish she ran over him since you think all cops are bad. Just like a good comrade. Lol
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Not really, there 57 pages of the car is a deadly weapon. One poster even calculated the force. So why was he in front of the vehicle out of any other useful position?

Edit spelling


The video shows him walking around the vehicle. When he is to the passenger side of the vehicle, she reversed and then he was in front of the vehicle. She put him in he forward driving line.

He wouldn't have even had time to draw his weapon before getting hit if she wouldn't have spun the tires on ice.

Not to mention in the same video it clearly shows her seeing the officer in front of the car before she accelerated. She looked right at him.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

No, I've trained plenty as an Infantry Officer. Somebody else's turn now.

Also, don't think common sense can be trained.

Situational awareness can be and he should learn it.


So you are not trained as a police officer, noted.
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doesn't explain why he was standing in front of a deadly weapon. Next…
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIDO_Ags said:

Doesn't explain why he was standing in front of a deadly weapon. Next…


He was not standing, stop lying
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And clearly he wasn't either since almost got himself run over, again.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.