Outdoors
Sponsored by

Legal ramifications against Camp Mystic

95,718 Views | 753 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by dermdoc
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Windy City Ag said:

Quote:

"In the event your cabin is floating away..." Different set of circumstances at La Junta. Different topography.

That isn't the point people are exploring though.

On the first signs of danger the LaJunta counselors immediately evacuated and in a fashion that was well rehearsed. They knew exactly how and where to go and were empowered to act by design.

Mystic had a 45 minute gap between weather warnings and being hit. It had a one page emergency plan in action that instructed counselors and campers to never leave the cabins during a flood event.

Did the owners of Mystic have plans in place that sealed their campers fate? Did they have available information and enough advanced warning that they could have saved lives?

Those are the points that are being explored.



Where did you get this from? They are great people, but they were also caught by surprise - the rise was just different there. They had a cabin full of campers floating away until it hit a tree. It was not a perfectly executed military operation.
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Eastland family spokesperson confirmed everything I just typed and the trial proceedings of the last week dug into these points in deep detail.

Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Okay.

https://www.ksat.com/video/news/2025/07/07/watch-a-cabin-full-of-camp-counselors-gets-taken-by-floodwaters-down-the-guadalupe-river/
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Check out the links I posted. Lots of good information to form an opinion. Long watch's but if you enjoy the legal process, and enjoy watching attorneys work, which I do, it's easy to stay focused and process the facts.

Don't rely on the news. Don't rely on parent accounts or opinions. Both will be biased for clicks or by emotional distress. Plus, neither were there or know what happened.

They are long watches to be sure but they are worth the time if you want to understand what happened and pick a side with a well formed opinion.
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nm
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gunny456 said:

This comparison is not the same. Hurricanes don't follow the same exact path every single time.
If every single hurricane that ever formed in the gulf followed one given path to hit the exact same spot along the coast ……and you had years of data that proved that….. then yes you are negligent for building something in that consistently given path.
A river does just that. The Guadalupe River valley was formed over thousands of years of the path of the Guadalupe eroding and forming it. The flood of 2025 happened sometime in the rivers history before. That was a given. It will happen again. That is a given as well.
It could happen again tomorrow, or this coming 4th of July again, or 80 years from now. Regardless we know it can happen.


Here's the deal though.

Every river floods. All of them. Some more frequent than others, but every single one in the history of the world has flooded and every single one will flood again. Up until this flood, which was an absolute freak of a weather event, for the entire life of Mystic and every other camp along the river, this had not happened.

But at some point you have to recognize that there are inherent dangers wherever you go. If you live in flood zones, it is inherent that at some point there will likely be a flood. If you live on the gulf coast or the east coast up to about DC, you are almost guaranteed to endure a tropical storm or hurricane at least once in your life. If you live in tornado alley, you are almost guaranteed to be affected by a tornado at some point in time. Up north it freezes every single year. It gets hot in the desert. Mountains have avalances and snow ins. Fire is always an inherent danger, even in the middle of the desert. Everywhere has a drought at some point. Everywhere has a flood at some point.

Danger is an absolute fact of life. We accept it daily. It isn't until something tragic happens that all of a sudden we get the "well they should have known!" armchair quarterbacking. Mystic had been around for [literally] 100 years. Up until last year there wasn't a need for contingency plans and having 47 people on staff who's entire job was to evacuate campers during a 500 year storm. It just had never really happened.

None of that takes away from the absolute tragedy of the situation - there is literally nothing that can be done with money or punishment or anything that will undo what nature did. What is happening now is little more than a pure vindictive need to blame somebody, anybody, and make a buck or two in the process. If the goal is to change early warning systems (which that county didn't have), then the focus should be on fixing that issue and not finding somebody to blame because they put their family first or didn't realize the gravity of the situation as the river rose 30+ feet in a matter of minutes like it did.

Now if you can show unequivocably that the owners of Mystic got warnings that told them the river was going to rise 30 feet in 20 minutes and prove they shrugged their shoulders and said "meh, whatever", then you have a different argument. But I have a hard time that particular sequence of events happened. There were plenty of others that died on the river that night other than the poor kids at Mystic as well. They all took a risk by camping on a literal riverbed in an area that, under the exact right freak set of circumstances, could produce deadly flash floods.

If the mentality is "can't ever build where it may flood, have fire, drought, etc." then we cannot build anything anywhere on this planet and you might as well wipe every single house in the hill country off the map. Which may not be a bad thing, but it is absolutely impractical.
John Cocktolstoy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^^^
Second Hardest Workin Man on Texags
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

Gunny456 said:

This comparison is not the same. Hurricanes don't follow the same exact path every single time.
If every single hurricane that ever formed in the gulf followed one given path to hit the exact same spot along the coast ……and you had years of data that proved that….. then yes you are negligent for building something in that consistently given path.
A river does just that. The Guadalupe River valley was formed over thousands of years of the path of the Guadalupe eroding and forming it. The flood of 2025 happened sometime in the rivers history before. That was a given. It will happen again. That is a given as well.
It could happen again tomorrow, or this coming 4th of July again, or 80 years from now. Regardless we know it can happen.


Here's the deal though.

Every river floods. All of them. Some more frequent than others, but every single one in the history of the world has flooded and every single one will flood again. Up until this flood, which was an absolute freak of a weather event, for the entire life of Mystic and every other camp along the river, this had not happened.

But at some point you have to recognize that there are inherent dangers wherever you go. If you live in flood zones, it is inherent that at some point there will likely be a flood. If you live on the gulf coast or the east coast up to about DC, you are almost guaranteed to endure a tropical storm or hurricane at least once in your life. If you live in tornado alley, you are almost guaranteed to be affected by a tornado at some point in time. Up north it freezes every single year. It gets hot in the desert. Mountains have avalances and snow ins. Fire is always an inherent danger, even in the middle of the desert. Everywhere has a drought at some point. Everywhere has a flood at some point.

Danger is an absolute fact of life. We accept it daily. It isn't until something tragic happens that all of a sudden we get the "well they should have known!" armchair quarterbacking. Mystic had been around for [literally] 100 years. Up until last year there wasn't a need for contingency plans and having 47 people on staff who's entire job was to evacuate campers during a 500 year storm. It just had never really happened.

None of that takes away from the absolute tragedy of the situation - there is literally nothing that can be done with money or punishment or anything that will undo what nature did. What is happening now is little more than a pure vindictive need to blame somebody, anybody, and make a buck or two in the process. If the goal is to change early warning systems (which that county didn't have), then the focus should be on fixing that issue and not finding somebody to blame because they put their family first or didn't realize the gravity of the situation as the river rose 30+ feet in a matter of minutes like it did.

Now if you can show unequivocably that the owners of Mystic got warnings that told them the river was going to rise 30 feet in 20 minutes and prove they shrugged their shoulders and said "meh, whatever", then you have a different argument. But I have a hard time that particular sequence of events happened. There were plenty of others that died on the river that night other than the poor kids at Mystic as well. They all took a risk by camping on a literal riverbed in an area that, under the exact right freak set of circumstances, could produce deadly flash floods.

If the mentality is "can't ever build where it may flood, have fire, drought, etc." then we cannot build anything anywhere on this planet and you might as well wipe every single house in the hill country off the map. Which may not be a bad thing, but it is absolutely impractical.


Sorry but your post pisses me off. Trying to get a buck? Vindictive? You ever lost a 8 y/o girl due to incompetence Wow.
27 girls died. Due to incompetence. The Eastlands will not give up Myatic. Myatic needs to continue under competent ownership. The only way to do that is to sue because the Eastlands will it give it up or even sell it.
I want 100 more Camp Mystics that are safe for 8 y/o girls and anybody else. Run by competent people with safety plans, walkie tallkie communications,, etc.
Having over 700 girls under your sworn care is completely different than an adult choosing to buy a beach house or build in a flood plain.
27 preventable deaths and you want to go after the parents of the dead kids? Wow
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

Gunny456 said:

This comparison is not the same. Hurricanes don't follow the same exact path every single time.
If every single hurricane that ever formed in the gulf followed one given path to hit the exact same spot along the coast ……and you had years of data that proved that….. then yes you are negligent for building something in that consistently given path.
A river does just that. The Guadalupe River valley was formed over thousands of years of the path of the Guadalupe eroding and forming it. The flood of 2025 happened sometime in the rivers history before. That was a given. It will happen again. That is a given as well.
It could happen again tomorrow, or this coming 4th of July again, or 80 years from now. Regardless we know it can happen.


Here's the deal though.

Every river floods. All of them. Some more frequent than others, but every single one in the history of the world has flooded and every single one will flood again. Up until this flood, which was an absolute freak of a weather event, for the entire life of Mystic and every other camp along the river, this had not happened.

But at some point you have to recognize that there are inherent dangers wherever you go. If you live in flood zones, it is inherent that at some point there will likely be a flood. If you live on the gulf coast or the east coast up to about DC, you are almost guaranteed to endure a tropical storm or hurricane at least once in your life. If you live in tornado alley, you are almost guaranteed to be affected by a tornado at some point in time. Up north it freezes every single year. It gets hot in the desert. Mountains have avalances and snow ins. Fire is always an inherent danger, even in the middle of the desert. Everywhere has a drought at some point. Everywhere has a flood at some point.

Danger is an absolute fact of life. We accept it daily. It isn't until something tragic happens that all of a sudden we get the "well they should have known!" armchair quarterbacking. Mystic had been around for [literally] 100 years. Up until last year there wasn't a need for contingency plans and having 47 people on staff who's entire job was to evacuate campers during a 500 year storm. It just had never really happened.

None of that takes away from the absolute tragedy of the situation - there is literally nothing that can be done with money or punishment or anything that will undo what nature did. What is happening now is little more than a pure vindictive need to blame somebody, anybody, and make a buck or two in the process. If the goal is to change early warning systems (which that county didn't have), then the focus should be on fixing that issue and not finding somebody to blame because they put their family first or didn't realize the gravity of the situation as the river rose 30+ feet in a matter of minutes like it did.

Now if you can show unequivocably that the owners of Mystic got warnings that told them the river was going to rise 30 feet in 20 minutes and prove they shrugged their shoulders and said "meh, whatever", then you have a different argument. But I have a hard time that particular sequence of events happened. There were plenty of others that died on the river that night other than the poor kids at Mystic as well. They all took a risk by camping on a literal riverbed in an area that, under the exact right freak set of circumstances, could produce deadly flash floods.

If the mentality is "can't ever build where it may flood, have fire, drought, etc." then we cannot build anything anywhere on this planet and you might as well wipe every single house in the hill country off the map. Which may not be a bad thing, but it is absolutely impractical.


And sure there is anger and maybe a little vindictiveness. I would hope you would feel the same way if somebody's incompetence caused the death of your child.
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently you missed the whole point of what I said. I stated simply that his comparison to hurricane damage and risk was not the same as a single rivers risk that had already shown for thousands of years where it floods. A river doesn't change its location on a map…it's basically in the same geographical location year after year.
A hurricane can go anywhere along the gulf ..it doesn't follow the same path everytime. Right?
If it rains like hell on the Guadalupe River watershed, the Guadalupe River is going to flood every single time. Right?
If a hurricane comes into the gulf it doesn't always follow that same path and tear up the same houses every time like the Guadalupe River does….or any river.
I don't know what's so hard to understand about that comparison that I made.
TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!
Ogre09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're throwing around "incompetence" a lot...
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where in my post above did I use the word incompetence?
TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gunny456 said:

Apparently you missed the whole point of what I said. I stated simply that his comparison to hurricane damage and risk was not the same as a single rivers risk that had already shown for thousands of years where it floods. A river doesn't change its location on a map…it's basically in the same geographical location year after year.
A hurricane's can go anywhere along the gulf ..it doesn't follow the same path everytime.
If it rains like hell on the Guadalupe River watershed, the Guadalupe River is going to flood every single time.
If a hurricane comes into the gulf it doesn't always follow that same path and tear up the same houses every time like the Guadalupe River does….or any river.
I don't know what's so hard to understand about that comparison that I made.


The main difference is that if an individual chooses to accept those then it is on them.

Totally different when you pay people to take care of your child and they ensure safety. Whether flood, fire, hurricane, or tornado they have to have the competence to handle an emergency situation. Obviously, the Eastlands did not.
If the Eastlands would give up Mystic I wager a lot of the legal stuff would go away. But they will not unless forced to.
And the poster who accused the parents of the dead girls wanted a "couple of bucks" why do you think the Eastlands pushed to re open this summer? If it wasn't for "a few bucks" then offer the camp for free. Pure greed.
TexasAg95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.H. Dexippus said:

98Ag99Grad said:

TxAG-010 said:

There are no winners in this situation, legal battle, or frankly this thread....


Couldn't agree more.

The personal injury plaintiffs' attorneys raking in 40% would disagree. But they are the only ones.

If the camp is forced to close and sell the land then some other people would benefit as well.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ogre09 said:

You're throwing around "incompetence" a lot...


Have you read the links I provided? The Eastlands have not even reported the deaths as they required to.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAg95 said:

P.H. Dexippus said:

98Ag99Grad said:

TxAG-010 said:

There are no winners in this situation, legal battle, or frankly this thread....


Couldn't agree more.

The personal injury plaintiffs' attorneys raking in 40% would disagree. But they are the only ones.

If the camp is forced to close and sell the land then some other people would benefit as well.


The benefit would be that the camp would be run competently and safely.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To me, the best outcome would be for the families and the Eastlands to make a deal to settle. In exchange for release of any further claims, the Eastlands give up title to Mystic and the property and the insurance company pays out the full policy value into a fund to be used to repair and operate Mystic. The families form a council, hire professional camp management, and reopen with better plans and safer facilities located away from the flood plain. That is best case for everybody except the ones looking for a big pay day.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JAW3336 said:

Gunny456 said:


So don't build stuff where it can….and if you….yes you're negligent.

So every beach owner is negligent, including every town built near a beach.

All of New Orleans is negligent.

Anyone who builds in a valley or near a major river, i.e. the mississippi.

Got it.


Are any of those instances being paid to be responsible for the safety of 700 children?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

TexasAg95 said:

P.H. Dexippus said:

98Ag99Grad said:

TxAG-010 said:

There are no winners in this situation, legal battle, or frankly this thread....


Couldn't agree more.

The personal injury plaintiffs' attorneys raking in 40% would disagree. But they are the only ones.

If the camp is forced to close and sell the land then some other people would benefit as well.


The benefit would be that the camp would be run competently and safely.

If they are forced to sell the land on the open market, it is not ever going to be a camp again. It will either be snapped up by one of the rich folks living nearby to be part of their private ranch or it will be broken up and sold in 5-10 acre parcels for ranchettes. Nobody wanting to run a kid's camp has the funds on hand to outcompete the other interests in an open market sale.
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Likely outcome is Guadalupe camp is never opened again and Cypress continues to operate with a new camp location built on higher ground (like Cypress).
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

To me, the best outcome would be for the families and the Eastlands to make a deal to settle. In exchange for release of any further claims, the Eastlands give up title to Mystic and the property and the insurance company pays out the full policy value into a fund to be used to repair and operate Mystic. The families form a council, hire professional camp management, and reopen with better plans and safer facilities located away from the flood plain. That is best case for everybody except the ones looking for a big pay day.


I like that. The Eastlands are not going to budge in my opinion. There is nothing wrong with Mystic and I love the concept. Needs to be run by competent people.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

dermdoc said:

TexasAg95 said:

P.H. Dexippus said:

98Ag99Grad said:

TxAG-010 said:

There are no winners in this situation, legal battle, or frankly this thread....


Couldn't agree more.

The personal injury plaintiffs' attorneys raking in 40% would disagree. But they are the only ones.

If the camp is forced to close and sell the land then some other people would benefit as well.


The benefit would be that the camp would be run competently and safely.

If they are forced to sell the land on the open market, it is not ever going to be a camp again. It will either be snapped up by one of the rich folks living nearby to be part of their private ranch or it will be broken up and sold in 5-10 acre parcels for ranchettes. Nobody wanting to run a kid's camp has the funds on hand to outcompete the other interests in an open market sale.

So how do you get rid of the Eastlands and maintain the camp? I am all for that.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

txags92 said:

dermdoc said:

TexasAg95 said:

P.H. Dexippus said:

98Ag99Grad said:

TxAG-010 said:

There are no winners in this situation, legal battle, or frankly this thread....


Couldn't agree more.

The personal injury plaintiffs' attorneys raking in 40% would disagree. But they are the only ones.

If the camp is forced to close and sell the land then some other people would benefit as well.


The benefit would be that the camp would be run competently and safely.

If they are forced to sell the land on the open market, it is not ever going to be a camp again. It will either be snapped up by one of the rich folks living nearby to be part of their private ranch or it will be broken up and sold in 5-10 acre parcels for ranchettes. Nobody wanting to run a kid's camp has the funds on hand to outcompete the other interests in an open market sale.

So how do you get rid of the Eastlands and maintain the camp? I am all for that.

I think the Eastlands are going to lose the camp one way or another. Everything else leading up to that is just posturing. They can either give the camp up as part of a comprehensive settlement (which is complicated by the families hiring multiple different lawyers and filing multiple separate lawsuits) or they will lose a massive judgement verdict in court and be forced to sell the land to settle it or give up the land via filing for bankruptcy. Giving it up via settlement gives some chance that it could stay operating as a camp under new ownership, but IMO, forcing them to sell it or forfeit it into a bankruptcy proceeding means there is 0% chance of it ever being used as a camp again.
Howdy Dammit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

txags92 said:

To me, the best outcome would be for the families and the Eastlands to make a deal to settle. In exchange for release of any further claims, the Eastlands give up title to Mystic and the property and the insurance company pays out the full policy value into a fund to be used to repair and operate Mystic. The families form a council, hire professional camp management, and reopen with better plans and safer facilities located away from the flood plain. That is best case for everybody except the ones looking for a big pay day.


I like that. The Eastlands are not going to budge in my opinion. There is nothing wrong with Mystic and I love the concept. Needs to be run by competent people.

I don't know anything about the Eastlands or what was or wasn't done to save lives, so I can't really speak to that.

What I do believe is that you never truly know the level of competence of the people responsible for your children in a crisis.

We've seen that play out in Uvalde, where multiple levels of authority failed those kids. And then, just the other day, you see a principal step in, attack a gunman, and potentially save countless lives. One of those attacks had numerous individuals trained in crises management and completely failed, while the other had a single brave man with likely zero training or planning.

Plans look good on paper, but it's impossible to judge competency. This isn't to say having plans is worthless, but my professional career is very tightly tied to risk management, and I'll just say the hardest part of it is implementation when it matters. The easy part is getting clients to get me a plan to review.
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree.
TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!
Howdy Dammit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gunny456 said:

I don't know what's so hard to understand about that comparison that I made.

Because it all ultimately comes down to probability. Whether hurricanes follow the exact same path or not, each coastal region has its own probability curves for surge, wind, and rainfall based on historical data and modeling.

Storm path matters for a specific event, but over time it's already built into those probability distributions.

So each coastal town still has a known probability of experiencing certain levels of impact, just like a river has a known probability of exceeding a certain stage.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Howdy Dammit said:

dermdoc said:

txags92 said:

To me, the best outcome would be for the families and the Eastlands to make a deal to settle. In exchange for release of any further claims, the Eastlands give up title to Mystic and the property and the insurance company pays out the full policy value into a fund to be used to repair and operate Mystic. The families form a council, hire professional camp management, and reopen with better plans and safer facilities located away from the flood plain. That is best case for everybody except the ones looking for a big pay day.


I like that. The Eastlands are not going to budge in my opinion. There is nothing wrong with Mystic and I love the concept. Needs to be run by competent people.


I don't know anything about the Eastlands or what was or wasn't done to save lives, so I can't really speak to that.

What I do believe is that you never truly know the level of competence of the people responsible for your children in a crisis.

We've seen that play out in Uvalde, where multiple levels of authority failed those kids. And then, just the other day, you see a principal step in, attack a gunman, and potentially save countless lives. One of those attacks had numerous individuals trained in crises management and completely failed, while the other had a single brave man with likely zero training or planning.

Plans look good on paper, but it's impossible to judge competency. This isn't to say having plans is worthless, but my professional career is very tightly tied to risk management, and I'll just say the hardest part of it is implementation when it matters. The easy part is getting clients to get me a plan to review.

I completely agree. At some level, there has to be some competence. Unfortunately for the 27 girls there appears that there was none. The mention of the lack of plans is frankly a legal maneuver to try to prove incompetence. I think the actions and horrible outcomes speak for themselves.
John Cocktolstoy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dermdoc, I'm really surprised you are not pushing for an investigation against the Eastland's for withholding the location of the missing kids. Give it a break man. They have been doing this for a long time and doing it right. No abuse or problems. Just good folks trying to do this world some good.
I wish as many satisfied clients and employees were called to the stand, but half will have passed with age. I'm all for letting this play out and you just want to just bash the owners and claim "incompetence" every post.
Second Hardest Workin Man on Texags
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep. And it's a 100% probability that if rains like heck on the upper Guadalupe River shed, the river is going to flood. It's been doing that down that single path of that river for thousands of years. And it's going to do it again and probable it could be much worse.
People should know that and be prepared for that.
TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Cocktolstoy said:

Dermdoc, I'm really surprised you are not pushing for an investigation against the Eastland's for withholding the location of the missing kids. Give it a break man. They have been doing this for a long time and doing it right. No abuse or problems. Just good folks trying to do this world some good.
I wish as many satisfied clients and employees were called to the stand, but half will have passed with age. I'm all for letting this play out and you just want to just bash the owners and claim "incompetence" every post.

Did you read the links I posted?
There are a lot of "good folks" who should not be in charge of 700 girls. I am not bashing the goodness of the Eastlands. I am just pointing out incompetence that led to2) preventable deaths. There is a huge difference.

There are really good folks that are incompetent doctors. It is not about their "goodness". But to let them go on practicing when they have shown you they are incompetent, is frankly irresponsible and dangerous.
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's not really a fair thing to say to him brother.
TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Cocktolstoy said:

Dermdoc, I'm really surprised you are not pushing for an investigation against the Eastland's for withholding the location of the missing kids. Give it a break man. They have been doing this for a long time and doing it right. No abuse or problems. Just good folks trying to do this world some good.
I wish as many satisfied clients and employees were called to the stand, but half will have passed with age. I'm all for letting this play out and you just want to just bash the owners and claim "incompetence" every post.

Could the Eastlands at least report the deaths as they are legally required to do? Seems to be kind if revealing to me,
But I doubt you took the time to read the links I provided.
John Cocktolstoy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gunny456 said:

That's not really a fair thing to say to him brother.

Oh I have to disagree, this is getting out of control. It's like CNN is on here using the same word over and over so everyone is familiar with the Eastlands and "incompetence".
Second Hardest Workin Man on Texags
chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

John Cocktolstoy said:

Dermdoc, I'm really surprised you are not pushing for an investigation against the Eastland's for withholding the location of the missing kids. Give it a break man. They have been doing this for a long time and doing it right. No abuse or problems. Just good folks trying to do this world some good.
I wish as many satisfied clients and employees were called to the stand, but half will have passed with age. I'm all for letting this play out and you just want to just bash the owners and claim "incompetence" every post.

Could the Eastlands at least report the deaths as they are legally required to do? Seems to be kind if revealing to me,

Do they need to do this? Yes. Is it the gotcha you think it is? No.
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I've said before and will say again. The problem in the entire situation is the lack of a plan. Any plan. Having no way to communicate with kids in cabins in an emergency situation is in excusable. They had a loud speaker. It wasnt used. The counselors had no two way radios. no phones. It's utter stupidity to allow kids to sleep unsupervised to begin with without there being some way for them to communicate with adults in case of an emergency, whether that be an allergic reaction, broken arm, or god forbid a flood when sleeping next to a river during a rain storm.

When you house 800 children next to a river it is the responsibility of the camp to care for them and keep them safe. God forbid someone stays up and loses a few hours of sleep to monitor there phones, radar, etc in case of an emergency. Lets say even if you do decide to tell kids to stay in their cabins during a flood event. How about providing life jackets in all cabins? Something. Anything.

Some here need to read the testimony of whats been said in court. It is pretty eye opening. It's obvious they underestimated the scope of the weather situation and what happened, but how is there not 24 hour watch going on for a camp this size from MULTIPLE people? THATS THE PROBLEM.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.