His username is a travesty

You can't convince it

DarkBrandon01 said:

---

The idea that citizens need a legal avenue to buy guns so that they might one day illegally and violently resist the government has always been a terrible argument for 2A.

The only other group who makes this argument are Marxists.

---

This is one of the least intelligent remarks I've seen on this site in a very very long time. I know you don't believe an ounce of this but still.

samurai_science said:

---

Kyle Rittenhouse showed up to the fiery protest armed and liberals went nuts.

---

Until the police took his gun and then shot him in the head. Then libs were cool with it!!

redseven94 said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Kyle Rittenhouse showed up to the fiery protest armed and liberals went nuts.

---

Until the police took his gun and then shot him in the head. Then libs were cool with it!!

---

I also remember him being a full time paid agitator who was instructed to fight and obstruct police. Democrats doing what Democrats do

ICE's actions are their literal jobs. Necessary because the potato who held the WH from 21-24 refused to enforce immigration law. To the extent he knew what planet he was on.

If he had merely been protesting, he'd still be alive. Shame he was so stupid. All to protect violent criminals.

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

This thread should be titled, "conservatives do 180 on 2nd amendment."

---

In your own mind.

We have already said that he had a right to carry that weapon.

I've even said I see as no problem the extra mags. I do that when I carry.

Nobody has the right nor should they have the expectation that with any altercation with the police (which he was specifically there to do) carrying a weapon at that time will become a huge and risky complicating factor.

---

There was no altercation with ICE.

---

Do you at least agree that by being in a tense situation, with a gun and voluntarily injecting himself into the situation that he greatly increased the risk something could go horribly wrong? I'm not asking you to abandon your belief that this was unjustified, just curious on the previous statement.

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

I'm being serious and you are calling people "fat rejects". Your username clearly isn't indicative of your faith.

I was trying to discuss a point on how we can all do better to avoid the loss of human life, which should be everyone's goal. ICE may completely be in the wrong but we should all strive to be better. Apparently having rational discourse is not what some want. Sad.

---

Have you been on this board? Do you see the hate spewed on here by Christians? And you're upset by"fat rejects"?

MJ20/20 said:

---

DarkBrandon01 said:

---

The idea that citizens need a legal avenue to buy guns so that they might one day illegally and violently resist the government has always been a terrible argument for 2A.

The only other group who makes this argument are Marxists.

---

This is one of the least intelligent remarks I've seen on this site in a very very long time. I know you don't believe an ounce of this but still.

---

Uh.. I can guarantee you he believes it.

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

This thread should be titled, "conservatives do 180 on 2nd amendment."

---

In your own mind.

We have already said that he had a right to carry that weapon.

I've even said I see as no problem the extra mags. I do that when I carry.

Nobody has the right nor should they have the expectation that with any altercation with the police (which he was specifically there to do) carrying a weapon at that time will become a huge and risky complicating factor.

---

There was no altercation with ICE.

---

Do you at least agree that by being in a tense situation, with a gun and voluntarily injecting himself into the situation that he greatly increased the risk something could go horribly wrong? I'm not asking you to abandon your belief that this was unjustified, just curious on the previous statement.

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

I'm being serious and you are calling people "fat rejects". Your username clearly isn't indicative of your faith.

I was trying to discuss a point on how we can all do better to avoid the loss of human life, which should be everyone's goal. ICE may completely be in the wrong but we should all strive to be better. Apparently having rational discourse is not what some want. Sad.

---

Have you been on this board? Do you see the hate spewed on here by Christians? And you're upset by"fat rejects"?

---

Please post proof of hate

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

This thread should be titled, "conservatives do 180 on 2nd amendment."

---

In your own mind.

We have already said that he had a right to carry that weapon.

I've even said I see as no problem the extra mags. I do that when I carry.

Nobody has the right nor should they have the expectation that with any altercation with the police (which he was specifically there to do) carrying a weapon at that time will become a huge and risky complicating factor.

---

There was no altercation with ICE.

---

Do you at least agree that by being in a tense situation, with a gun and voluntarily injecting himself into the situation that he greatly increased the risk something could go horribly wrong? I'm not asking you to abandon your belief that this was unjustified, just curious on the previous statement.

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

I'm being serious and you are calling people "fat rejects". Your username clearly isn't indicative of your faith.

I was trying to discuss a point on how we can all do better to avoid the loss of human life, which should be everyone's goal. ICE may completely be in the wrong but we should all strive to be better. Apparently having rational discourse is not what some want. Sad.

---

Have you been on this board? Do you see the hate spewed on here by Christians? And you're upset by"fat rejects"?

---

Sound rationale. Others do it, and worse, so why shouldn't I. Definitely something Christ would do.

You clearly aren't interested in having a discussion on how we can all prevent something like this in the future. Best of luck to you.

You think fat rejects is worse?

I get it. You love ICE and the low standards they have. Let's not get personal at me with your frustration

samurai_science said:

---

redseven94 said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Kyle Rittenhouse showed up to the fiery protest armed and liberals went nuts.

---

Until the police took his gun and then shot him in the head. Then libs were cool with it!!

---

I also remember him being a full time paid agitator who was instructed to fight and obstruct police. Democrats doing what Democrats do

---

You have to e joking?? The veteran nurse was a full time paid agitator? Can you really believe your position?

I had plenty of discussion yesterday while I was told by people they feel bad for my kids and our church, while also laughing at the death in Minneapolis.

Have a blessed day.

They don't actually believe it

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

This thread should be titled, "conservatives do 180 on 2nd amendment."

---

In your own mind.

We have already said that he had a right to carry that weapon.

I've even said I see as no problem the extra mags. I do that when I carry.

Nobody has the right nor should they have the expectation that with any altercation with the police (which he was specifically there to do) carrying a weapon at that time will become a huge and risky complicating factor.

---

There was no altercation with ICE.

---

Do you at least agree that by being in a tense situation, with a gun and voluntarily injecting himself into the situation that he greatly increased the risk something could go horribly wrong? I'm not asking you to abandon your belief that this was unjustified, just curious on the previous statement.

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

That's not a Christ-like statement.

DarkBrandon01 said:

---

The idea that citizens need a legal avenue to buy guns so that they might one day illegally and violently resist the government has always been a terrible argument for 2A.

The only other group who makes this argument are Marxists.

---

Sure explains all those marxist run countries where common citizens are armed.

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

I had plenty of discussion yesterday while I was told by people they feel bad for my kids and our church, while also laughing at the death in Minneapolis.

Have a blessed day.

---

And was I one of those people saying they feel bad for you? Did I say anything indicating I was laughing at or celebrating a death?

samurai_science said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

samurai_science said:

---

Kyle Rittenhouse showed up to the fiery protest armed and liberals went nuts.

---

He wasn't protesting

---

Neither are the liberals

---

Okay, they are pretending to protest.

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

Doesn't seem like a very Christ-like response.

Old McDonald said:

---

time to scrap the second amendment altogether. we endure mass shooting after mass shooting, year after year, because people claim it's necessary to protect us from government tyranny. now those same people are siding with government tyranny. throw it out.

---

Um you might want to see how that has been working out for the people of Australia and the UK.

I mean, you said you're teaching them your version of Christianity…

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

This thread should be titled, "conservatives do 180 on 2nd amendment."

---

In your own mind.

We have already said that he had a right to carry that weapon.

I've even said I see as no problem the extra mags. I do that when I carry.

Nobody has the right nor should they have the expectation that with any altercation with the police (which he was specifically there to do) carrying a weapon at that time will become a huge and risky complicating factor.

---

There was no altercation with ICE.

---

Do you at least agree that by being in a tense situation, with a gun and voluntarily injecting himself into the situation that he greatly increased the risk something could go horribly wrong? I'm not asking you to abandon your belief that this was unjustified, just curious on the previous statement.

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

I'm being serious and you are calling people "fat rejects". Your username clearly isn't indicative of your faith.

I was trying to discuss a point on how we can all do better to avoid the loss of human life, which should be everyone's goal. ICE may completely be in the wrong but we should all strive to be better. Apparently having rational discourse is not what some want. Sad.

---

Have you been on this board? Do you see the hate spewed on here by Christians? And you're upset by"fat rejects"?

---

Yours is a display of animus out of ignorance towards people who are lawfully authorized to do exactly what they are doing in Minnesota, Tennessee, Texas and other states.

Or did you miss Romans 13 while you and your co-religionists were hoping that bullet did more than take out Trump's ear?

We've seen hate. Take a look at the left's reaction to Charlie Kirk and his wife and get back to us in relation to your moral purity.

Heineken-Ashi said:

---

MJ20/20 said:

---

DarkBrandon01 said:

---

The idea that citizens need a legal avenue to buy guns so that they might one day illegally and violently resist the government has always been a terrible argument for 2A.

The only other group who makes this argument are Marxists.

---

This is one of the least intelligent remarks I've seen on this site in a very very long time. I know you don't believe an ounce of this but still.

---

Uh.. I can guarantee you he believes it.

---

Poster used to post as Neehau. Is probably chinese. And that should explain it all.

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

I had plenty of discussion yesterday while I was told by people they feel bad for my kids and our church, while also laughing at the death in Minneapolis.

Have a blessed day.

---

Yes,
You are the real victim here.

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

I had plenty of discussion yesterday while I was told by people they feel bad for my kids and our church, while also laughing at the death in Minneapolis.

Have a blessed day.

---

And was I one of those people saying they feel bad for you? Did I say anything indicating I was laughing at or celebrating a death?

---

Did I direct any of my comments towards you in the first place?

TheGifGuy said:

---

I mean, you said you're teaching them your version of Christianity…

---

It's simple, would Jesus celebrate a healer (ICU nurse) being murdered?

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

You're literally bearing false witness about people doing their jobs, enforcing our duly passed laws. You're advocating for rebellion and endangering American lives.

This is still OUR country. It doesn't belong to illegal criminals or those who are stealing federal taxpayers blind. There is nothing Christian about protecting criminals from justice.

---

You have made up a completely false reality and convinced yourself that it's true to justify your support of an obviously evil man.

Even yesterday you were making points that were easily disproven, and yet here you are continuing the same narratives.

You are a sheep, and the shepherd isn't who you think it is. And deep down, you know it. Otherwise you are truly lost.

Grok, WTAF happened ITT?

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

TheGifGuy said:

---

I mean, you said you're teaching them your version of Christianity…

---

It's simple, would Jesus celebrate a healer (ICU nurse) being murdered?

---

Would Jesus celebrate the harassment of officials who are arresting murderers and rapists while they are enforcing the law of the land?
Would Jesus tolerate sojourners who rape children, steal from and murder their hosts?
Would Jesus tolerate the Islamists, who worship a false god, and are satan's minions?
Would Jesus tolerate those who sacrifice their children to the altar of liberalism?

deddog said:

---

Heineken-Ashi said:

---

MJ20/20 said:

---

DarkBrandon01 said:

---

The idea that citizens need a legal avenue to buy guns so that they might one day illegally and violently resist the government has always been a terrible argument for 2A.

The only other group who makes this argument are Marxists.

---

This is one of the least intelligent remarks I've seen on this site in a very very long time. I know you don't believe an ounce of this but still.

---

Uh.. I can guarantee you he believes it.

---

Poster used to post as Neehau. Is probably chinese. And that should explain it all.

---

Seriously?! That would explain the absolutely horrible takes.

That guy (?) goes through handles like nobody's business.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

It was only tense because of ICE's actions. A bunch of fat rejects being given authority.

---

You're literally bearing false witness about people doing their jobs, enforcing our duly passed laws. You're advocating for rebellion and endangering American lives.

This is still OUR country. It doesn't belong to illegal criminals or those who are stealing federal taxpayers blind. There is nothing Christian about protecting criminals from justice.

---

Chuuuuuch! </Snoop voice>

deddog said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

TheGifGuy said:

---

I mean, you said you're teaching them your version of Christianity…

---

It's simple, would Jesus celebrate a healer (ICU nurse) being murdered?

---

Would Jesus celebrate the harassment of officials who are arresting murderers and rapists while they are enforcing the law of the land?
Would Jesus tolerate sojourners who rape children, steal from and murder their hosts?
Would Jesus tolerate the Islamists, who worship a false god, and are satan's minions?
Would Jesus tolerate those who sacrifice their children to the altar of liberalism?

---

I don't believe Jesus spoke about an altar of liberalism.

There's a lot of irony is talking about Jesus not tolerating the rape of children.

I'm also still waiting for any evidence that Alex harassed these ICE agents

The second amendment is the only thing truly preventing globalist totalitarianism. It keeps our own government from becoming totalitarian and violating other fundamental rights as Americans have determined to codify them. This in turn ensures that the remaining global superpower and fundamental center of modern technology and communication infrastructure remains sufficiently free that governments in the rest of the world cannot fully manipulate their own citizens with censorship and misinformation or collude together on globalist agendas. Because America still has free speech and can allow for idea communication, a slow slide into centralized Orwellian or Huxleyan authoritarianism is checked.