Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Speech & debate… ain't that exclusive to in-session speech on the floor? Am I missing something, or this just a last ditch Hail Mary?

---

You would think...
But I think it's currently being interpreted more broadly as in anything related to their capacity as an elected office holder of their respective chamber. In some cases I think folks have used it to outright slander their election competition or other candidates, then use S&D as immunity/defense to any legal remedy.

Hence my comment above that it should only be on the floor or in immediate response to active agenda items on the floor of their respective chamber.

Edit... Just a Geologist but also a Diamond Holiday Inn member...

Okay, UCMJ out of my bailiwick but does a federal court even have jurisdiction absent a habeas corpus which is not applicable here? My gut says they do not.

aggiehawg said:

---

Okay, UCMJ out of my bailiwick but does a federal court even have jurisdiction absent a habeas corpus which is not applicable here? My gut says they do not.

---

My gut says they can find a judge that will be willing to invent his own jurisdiction if need be...

And this is what he is encouraging which can have real consequences should soldiers be stupid enough to follow their propaganda.

This guy is always doubling down on his lies and stupidity. Have they stripped him of everything yet?

Yeah nice try. pic.twitter.com/bHucujCkfV https://t.co/0w1yGsT55u

— MAZE (@mazemoore) January 31, 2026

I won't forget that we're forced to pay for the health care of millions of illegal aliens who have no right to even be here, thanks to democrats. Democrats want the rest of us to pay for their slaves.