Looks like my crew, but we were eating!!

flown-the-coop said:

---

He also said the fishermen attacks were about Trump killing brown people. The boats are coming from Venezuela, where over 40% of the people identify as white....

---

I knew he was running for president when he played the race card with his 'brown people' bs.

New: DOD says it is “escalating” its review into Sen Mark Kelly “to an official command investigation.”

Full statement from a Pentagon official:

“The Office of the Secretary of War, in conjunction with the Department of War's Office of the General Counsel, is escalating the…

— Briana Reilly (@briana_reilly) December 15, 2025

News — Here is Sen. Kelly’s attorney responding to DoD.

“If the Executive Branch were to move forward in any forum—criminal, disciplinary, or administrative—we will take all appropriate legal action on Senator Kelly’s behalf to halt the Administration’s unprecedented and… https://t.co/jC9fQrYnvy pic.twitter.com/1MX4N0PTts

— Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio) December 15, 2025

Kelly is my Senator though I'd prefer he not be. I think his words were unnecessary, calculated and dangerous but I expect nothing to happen to him just like all the other democrats like Comey, et al.

I hope there are some serious consequences to Kelly's and the other's treason.

For additional context on Mark Kelly's corruption, he is one of the largest recipients of laundered campaign donations from smurfs.

This chart shows data on 42 smurfs that are individuals whose identities have likely been stolen and are being used by organizations such as ActBlue to make thousands of small money donations to campaigns across the country. Mark Kelly's campaign has received donations from a larger number of smurfs than any other member of congress according to Owen Gregorian's research.

Massive Democrat Money Laundering Discovered - Names include Gretchen Whitmer, Jon Ossoff and Cory Booker | Bob Cushman, The Gateway Pundit

Once in a while, a reporter finds a story that challenges his or her ability to tell because it is so massive in terms of time and scope.… pic.twitter.com/ZukE8OEiHF

— Owen Gregorian (@OwenGregorian) December 16, 2025

The smurf with the smallest donation total of $20,799 is 92 years old and 1561 individual campaign donations averaging $13.32.

The smurf with the largest donation total of $1,324,205 is 65 years old and made 24,680 individual campaign donations averaging $53.65 each.

Each smurf has made between small donations of an average amount ranging from $4.41 to $248.01 per donation.

The number of those small donations per individual ranges from 1,083 to 34,729 donations.

The total of donations for individual smurfs ranges from $20,799 to $1,324,205.

Of the 40 smurfs that donated to Mark Kelly, none of them legally reside in Arizona.

The age of the smurfs donating to Mark Kelly range in age from 65 to 100.

The smurfing technique for laundering soft money donations into hard money donations is happening predominantly from the left but the author also says that WinRed does this on a smaller scale.

ts5641 said:

---

I hope there are some serious consequences to Kelly's and the other's treason.

---

Nothing will happen.

ts5641 said:

---

I hope there are some serious consequences to Kelly's and the other's treason.

---

Have no fear, Bondi & Kash are on the case!!

Maybe I'm dumb, but a contribution that's not a round number seems like a red flag

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Maybe I'm dumb, but a contribution that's not a round number seems like a red flag

---

Anyone making tens of thousands of individual donations is also a red flag.

I went through that whole analysis (if you can call it that). Nowhere does he even hint at the timeframe for this data. Is it one election cycle or lifetime? With the advent of automated, recurring donations, I could absolutely see how these numbers could be legitimate, especially over a long period of time.

Obviously these are wealthy people in general. If I donated $5/month to 50 senators and 200 house members, that would add up to 3k donations per year totaling $15k. Make it $10/month and it's $30k. Do that for just 10 years and you're up to $300k. Actblue and Winred make it super easy to do this.

And this doesn't even count any larger one-time donations. They might max out to their local politicians and give $2/month to hundreds of others. Some of these people are probably giving much more to super PACs and other vehicles. They are deeply invested in politics.

Ultimately his whole case is based on suspicion of big numbers, but they aren't that big when you look at it from a wealthy person's perspective.

He does discuss the timelines, and also discusses the donation spread, for random races, over multiple states.

He also discusses the slew of donations, from dead people.

Trying to explain this away is a fool's errand.

Narco terrorists are much more likely to donate to politicians than the average leftist.

AgGrad99 said:

---

He does discuss the timelines, and also discusses the donation spread, for random races, over multiple states.

He also discusses the slew of donations, from dead people.

Trying to explain this away is a fool's errand.

---

That could also potentially be explained by automatic, recurring donations that kept going after the person died. If I make 500+ contributions per month through the same platform, they will probably all draw on the same day each month.

AgGrad99 said:

---

He does discuss the timelines, and also discusses the donation spread, for random races, over multiple states.

He also discusses the slew of donations, from dead people.

Trying to explain this away is a fool's errand.

---

Also, you said he discussed timelines, what is the date range for the data?

The desperation to go after Kelly while defending Hegseth is still hilarious. Like real life chuckle.

Scores of people donating 25,000 small individual donations? People making hundreds of donations for years after they were dead? People making their initial donation after they died? 3/4ths of the donations made from people out of the candidates State? (all from the same vulnerable demographic)

Even if you can explain some of it away, surely you don't think all of this is above board?

ETFan said:

---

The desperation to go after Kelly while defending Hegseth is still hilarious. Like real life chuckle.

---

Hegseth is taking out drug traffickers. Kelly is using false narratives encouraging insubordination in our military ranks putting our nation and service members at risk for his own selfish political gains. Kelly is a degenerate POS, but representative of his scum bag voters. I'll give him that.

First of all, this one is just astounding!

The amount of investigative work on this will take six months. Please don't show up with the "nothing will happen" tripe. I'm every bit as cynical as y'all are. I just can't live my life in a constant daily giving up.

I'm not sure if those types of comments are worse than the daily news of Islam slowly taking over Texas, and the rest of our country.

Oh, ETfan, as soon as Hegseth begs the UNITED STATES MILITARY to overthrow our government, which is what Kelly did, I'll be quite happy to go after his ass.

Hopefully, I'll be allowed to keep the small amount of faith in the US I still have.

The amount of planning, money, and foresight it took for that one account is just astounding. The best hope I have for the '26 election is the majority of this crap coming out continuously starting in March through next November.

esteban said:

---

I went through that whole analysis (if you can call it that). Nowhere does he even hint at the timeframe for this data. Is it one election cycle or lifetime? With the advent of automated, recurring donations, I could absolutely see how these numbers could be legitimate, especially over a long period of time.

Obviously these are wealthy people in general. If I donated $5/month to 50 senators and 200 house members, that would add up to 3k donations per year totaling $15k. Make it $10/month and it's $30k. Do that for just 10 years and you're up to $300k. Actblue and Winred make it super easy to do this.

And this doesn't even count any larger one-time donations. They might max out to their local politicians and give $2/month to hundreds of others. Some of these people are probably giving much more to super PACs and other vehicles. They are deeply invested in politics.

Ultimately his whole case is based on suspicion of big numbers, but they aren't that big when you look at it from a wealthy person's perspective.

---

It's already been document that some of those 'donations' were done on behalf on people who didn't know they made the donations.

AgGrad99 said:

---

Scores of people donating 25,000 small individual donations? People making hundreds of donations for years after they were dead? People making their initial donation after they died? 3/4ths of the donations made from people out of the candidates State? (all from the same vulnerable demographic)

Even if you can explain some of it away, surely you don't think all of this is above board?

---

Liberals have no ethics so everything is above board.

I think the tide is turning in Arizona.

jja79 said:

---

I think the tide is turning in Arizona.

---

George Strait has something he'd like to sell you.

It is where TPUSA is headquartered and they have been putting on the full court press getting Republicans in office the last couple of years.

War Department increases the investigation to full command review, the last precursor to a court martial. VDH discusses.

I live within 25 minutes or so from TPUSA HQ so I'm very well aware.

HarleySpoon said:

---

jja79 said:

---

I think the tide is turning in Arizona.

---

George Strait has something he'd like to sell you.

---

I'm sticking with my post. I've got acquaintances here that have taken the red pill.

jja79 said:

---

HarleySpoon said:

---

jja79 said:

---

I think the tide is turning in Arizona.

---

George Strait has something he'd like to sell you.

---

I'm sticking with my post. I've got acquaintances here that have taken the red pill.

---

Are you saying Arizona is RED?!

AgGrad99 said:

---

Scores of people donating 25,000 small individual donations? People making hundreds of donations for years after they were dead? People making their initial donation after they died? 3/4ths of the donations made from people out of the candidates State? (all from the same vulnerable demographic)

Even if you can explain some of it away, surely you don't think all of this is above board?

---

Your trying to get a rational thought from a true believer.

aggiehawg said:

---

War Department increases the investigation to full command review, the last precursor to a court martial. VDH discusses.

---

I hope they have ALL of Kelly's communications, especially electronic, between these six miscreants. I would guess there is very incriminating evidence against all six of them.

Quote:

---

I hope they have ALL of Kelly's communications, especially electronic, between these six miscreants. I would guess there is very incriminating evidence against all six of them.

---

Probably but Kelly has much more exposure being subject to the UCMJ as he is whereas the others do not.

Did you read the post to which you replied? I said I believe the tide is turning.

jja79 said:

---

Did you read the post to which you replied? I said I believe the tide is turning.

---

Against Kelly? Or against Dems in general for state wide office?

I read it as Republicans could take over the corrupt State from Democrats.