Wasn't Age of Disclosure screened quite a while back in Austin at SXSW? Are there actually any concrete revelations?

surfandturfsbisa96 said:

---

Wasn't Age of Disclosure screened quite a while back in Austin at SXSW? Are there actually any concrete revelations?

---

Probably best if you define what you mean by "concrete".

THERE IS NO LINE! lol

There are credible (for instance, on-duty military, parks, and law enforcement) reports of giants, shape-shifting various "animal," gnomes, fairies, mermaids, Bigfoot type….not to mention shadows, aliens of various types

PLUS, patterns across time and environment, including "machine elves" where group trippers describe very similar scenes and encounters

So, yeah, no "line." This is not to say it's all metaphysical and non-material, only that the evidence is significant our materialist understanding is limited and reality is porous

BREAKING:

The groundbreaking documentary “The Age of Disclosure” (which features key voices on UAP, to include Rubio, Gillibrand, and Rounds) is set for a November 21 worldwide release on Prime Video, as well as an Oscar-qualifying theatrical run in NYC, LA, and Washington, DC. pic.twitter.com/GYgETXh8yM

— MarikvR (@MvonRen) October 16, 2025

TCTTS said:

---

Age of Disclosure coming to Amazon Prime soon? pic.twitter.com/ANlK14eD7E

— Terrestrial Material (@TerrestrialMat) October 12, 2025

---

I thought I saw a tweet that had it at 11/21

nvm... i see Redstone found it first

https://t.co/ZVfC5L0aYl

— The Age of Disclosure (@ageofdisclosure) October 16, 2025

The truth is coming 11/21. Worldwide on Prime Video & in select U.S. theaters.

An explosive documentary that reveals an 80-year global cover-up of non-human intelligent life, with testimony from 34 U.S. Government insiders.

— The Age of Disclosure (@ageofdisclosure) October 16, 2025

'The Age of Disclosure': Documentary Revealing Government Cover-Up of Non-Human Intelligence Sets Release in Theaters and on Amazon, Plus New Trailer https://t.co/pdilcfHKWU

— Variety (@Variety) October 16, 2025

Buzzy UFO Doc 'The Age of Disclosure' Lands VOD Streaming Date on Prime Video https://t.co/v5INhYtRM4

— The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) October 16, 2025

HOLY SHIT MAHN https://t.co/Rrx4VpPPFr

— Pat McAfee (@PatMcAfeeShow) October 16, 2025

If McAfee's reaction is anything to go by - and others follow suit - maybe this release can actually make a difference, at least in terms of public consciousness.

If this film was really that earth shattering and could change humanity, why wait till November 21 to release it?

What's noteworthy about the film is a parade of very credible, credentialed professionals stating explicitly that aliens plus our cooperation with some species of them have existed for almost a century.

Not "new" in the sense this hasn't happened before, but this is condensed, high-profile, urgent.

Literally no one said it's "earth shattering" and could "change humanity." Also, documentaries cost money. To that end, why should the filmmakers not seek both a profitable release strategy and one that maximizes the movie's exposure? Things like that take time to line up and secure. There was also apparently a legal issue that delayed the release from summer to fall.

Exactly.

Does it offer concrete proof? No.

But it baffles me how anyone can seriously consider the sheer number of highly credible officials coming forward together, in unison, on such a public stage, to make the claims they're making, and not think this is monumental, or that there's not something to their claims.

At this point it's simply not rational to think that this is some kind of ruse or nothingburger.

Look, here's something to always keep in mind. We have testimonies, including abduction, from very credible and consistent people. My personal "favorites" are Travis Walton and Betty and Barney Hill.

We have MANY military testimonies. There are consistencies if you read long enough (just trust me, bro). AND one commonality is porous realtires, "in and out" of our material world (there's definitely more to this world as well).

Therefore, "where's the evidence, man" should be viewed like Contact approached it: you love your parents? Prove it.

Sorry to rain on y'all's parade.

NoahAg said:

---

Sorry to rain on y'all's parade.

---

Posted above already. Also, this video only and specifically deals with the Hellfire missile "shootdown" video that (unfortunately) was released during the last congressional hearing. That video was obviously just a balloon shootdown with parallax effect causing the illusion of high speed. Elizondo, Knapp, and Corbell lost a lot of credibility with this one, IMO. Embarrassing.

Apache said:

---

Quote:

---

Does it offer concrete proof? No.

---

I'm not saying these folks haven't heard some things, or talked to some people, or maybe even seen stuff.
I'm at the point where talk is cheap. Show me a spacecraft, not a blip or light orb on a screen. Give me an alien, alive or dead; not a Peruvian doll mummy alien made with llama and spider monkey bones.

---

Two things...

1) You might be at that point, but the vast majority of the world isn't. They're not ready to even consider these possibilities (not just "we're not alone," but "we're not alone on this planet"), so it's going to take baby steps like this documentary to get them there, and to catch them up on the last eight years (since the 2017 New York Times article, Elizondo, Grusch, etc), which then lead to the last eight decades (since Roswell), which then potentially lead to the thousands of years prior (seeing as this phenomenon has likely been with us all along).

2) This kind of talk isn't cheap. Again, the sheer number, caliber, and credibility of officials coming forward in this documentary is objectively significant, if not staggering. Not to mention, in a court of law, circumstantial evidence - i.e. indirect evidence that suggests a fact through a logical inference based on other facts - can absolutely convict. Never mind in combination with first-hand testimony. In other words, if a jury were to hear the collective testimony of every credible pilot, government official, military official, nuclear technician, etc, that jury would absolutely rule in favor of the phenomenon being real. To that end, this documentary is basically a parade of "star witness" testimony, all on the same stand, so to speak. And that's huge.

TCTTS said:

---

Apache said:

---

Quote:

---

Does it offer concrete proof? No.

---

I'm not saying these folks haven't heard some things, or talked to some people, or maybe even seen stuff.
I'm at the point where talk is cheap. Show me a spacecraft, not a blip or light orb on a screen. Give me an alien, alive or dead; not a Peruvian doll mummy alien made with llama and spider monkey bones.

---

Two things...

1) You might be at that point, but the vast majority of the world isn't. They're not ready to even consider these possibilities (not just "we're not alone," but "we're not alone on this planet"), so it's going to take baby steps like this documentary to get them there, and to catch them up on the last eight years (since the 2017 New York Times article, Elizondo, Grusch, etc), which then lead to the last eight decades (since Roswell), which then potentially lead to the thousands of years prior (seeing as this phenomenon has likely been with us all along).

2) This kind of talk isn't cheap. Again, the sheer number, caliber, and credibility of officials coming forward in this documentary is objectively significant, if not staggering. Not to mention, in a court of law, circumstantial evidence - i.e. indirect evidence that suggests a fact through a logical inference based on other facts - can absolutely convict. Never mind in combination with first-hand testimony. In other words, if a jury were to hear the collective testimony of every credible pilot, government official, military official, nuclear technician, etc, that jury would absolutely rule in favor of the phenomenon being real. To that end, this documentary is basically a parade of "star witness" testimony, all on the same stand, so to speak. And that's huge.

---

On number 1. Stereotypical human will not know how to process this once it's in the open. Imagine the insanity if all of a sudden everybody 'experiences' on a very large scale. Not sure I want to be anywhere near that.

*drip*
*drip*
*drip*

What is Disclosure of a phenomenon where the non-material, at least for typical human senses at this time of hominid evolution, is so seemingly prevalent?

Disclosure has happened and is also happening right now.

Watch the film on Prime.

We need to support this

TCTTS said:

---

Apache said:

---

Quote:

---

Does it offer concrete proof? No.

---

I'm not saying these folks haven't heard some things, or talked to some people, or maybe even seen stuff.
I'm at the point where talk is cheap. Show me a spacecraft, not a blip or light orb on a screen. Give me an alien, alive or dead; not a Peruvian doll mummy alien made with llama and spider monkey bones.

---

2) This kind of talk isn't cheap. Again, the sheer number, caliber, and credibility of officials coming forward in this documentary is objectively significant, if not staggering. Not to mention, in a court of law, circumstantial evidence - i.e. indirect evidence that suggests a fact through a logical inference based on other facts - can absolutely convict. Never mind in combination with first-hand testimony. In other words, if a jury were to hear the collective testimony of every credible pilot, government official, military official, nuclear technician, etc, that jury would absolutely rule in favor of the phenomenon being real. To that end, this documentary is basically a parade of "star witness" testimony, all on the same stand, so to speak. And that's huge.

---

Name one credible person that has come forward with one credible claim since you started this thread. Just because someone works for the government or knows how to fly a fighter jet does not make them an expert in cosmology or theoretical physics.

These people get fooled by a video of a ballon getting popped but somehow keep their credibility, and the people that take the time to understand the video are the crazy ones!

I know I shouldn't be the turd in the punch bowl on this thread and just let y'all have your fun. It's just amazing to me such extraordinary claims can be made by podcasters and government employees, while the scientific community stays silent, and people believe it. Guess fantasy is preferable to reality sometimes.

guadalupeag said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

Apache said:

---

Quote:

---

Does it offer concrete proof? No.

---

I'm not saying these folks haven't heard some things, or talked to some people, or maybe even seen stuff.
I'm at the point where talk is cheap. Show me a spacecraft, not a blip or light orb on a screen. Give me an alien, alive or dead; not a Peruvian doll mummy alien made with llama and spider monkey bones.

---

2) This kind of talk isn't cheap. Again, the sheer number, caliber, and credibility of officials coming forward in this documentary is objectively significant, if not staggering. Not to mention, in a court of law, circumstantial evidence - i.e. indirect evidence that suggests a fact through a logical inference based on other facts - can absolutely convict. Never mind in combination with first-hand testimony. In other words, if a jury were to hear the collective testimony of every credible pilot, government official, military official, nuclear technician, etc, that jury would absolutely rule in favor of the phenomenon being real. To that end, this documentary is basically a parade of "star witness" testimony, all on the same stand, so to speak. And that's huge.

---

Name one credible person that has come forward with one credible claim since you started this thread. Just because someone works for the government or knows how to fly a fighter jet does not make them an expert in cosmology or theoretical physics.

These people get fooled by a video of a ballon getting popped but somehow keep their credibility, and the people that take the time to understand the video are the crazy ones!

I know I shouldn't be the turd in the punch bowl on this thread and just let y'all have your fun. It's just amazing to me such extraordinary claims can be made by podcasters and government employees, while the scientific community stays silent, and people believe it. Guess fantasy is preferable to reality sometimes.

---

Seriously? I'm not even going to indulge you with a retort. Go away.

Kirn is friends with some Congress folks that go into the secured bubbles.

Can I blow the whole UFO thing wide open for you?

You won't believe me anyway.

It's only matter of time until you hear things that will rock your world -- if your world is rockable. You will have a hard time verifying them but that's true of everything you hear. It's true of…

— Walter Kirn (@walterkirn) October 17, 2025

As for the dripping comment, go listen to Stanford's Garry Nolan, one of the top scientists in the world

Just started this one but it is NUTS already! Interview with former Air Force electronic intelligence and then NSA guy, Dan Sherman, whose mom was abducted by aliens while she was pregnant with Dan, and the aliens injected some sort of genetic code into him so he could intuitively communicate with aliens - ultimately becoming part of Project Preserve Destiny.

Teddy Perkins said:

---

Just started this one but it is NUTS already! Interview with former Air Force electronic intelligence and then NSA guy, Dan Sherman, whose mom was abducted by aliens while she was pregnant with Dan, and the aliens injected some sort of genetic code into him so he could intuitively communicate with aliens - ultimately becoming part of Project Preserve Destiny.

---

Well, we do need something to replace Stranger Things soon.