Entertainment
Sponsored by

*** UAP THREAD ***

641,823 Views | 6311 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Agador Spartacus
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Hello -
We have had success out in the field with Phase 1 operations and will be sharing that success with everyone here in Episode II.

I have grown to appreciate and be patient with the editing process. We have hours and hours of footage from our time on the range last month that the editing team has been hard at work with - doing their thing to present a well put together account of what has been going on.

What to expect in Part II -

We will be introducing members of our team you haven't met before.

We will be going over our class designations for the different types of UAP we have encountered.

We will be sharing brand new data captured on the range for some of those classes.

We will be sharing our approach and goals for the next 6 months.

Thanks to all for your interest and support. It takes a lot of resources to explore this frontier full-time and we are eternally grateful for the opportunity to do so.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/drone-swarms-national-security-60-minutes-transcript/
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't watched the segment yet, but plan on doing so later tonight. Here it is in full...

Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacque Vallee was a pretty good Rogan podcast about UAP's and other things. Believe him or not, it was entertaining.

He is likely engaged in an alternate reality, but I enjoyed listening to him. I don't intend to create controversy with this post, only to make his podcast known in case some may have missed it.

I appreciate Rogan's dedication to the subject, and other fringe "science" subjects. Rogan has a true passion for it, and that's fun to watch someone engaged in their passion.

I appreciated Vallee's comment about a simulation, and how aliens may have been inserted into the world like a video game, in and out. I half-baked agree with Elon we are likely in a simulation. Vallee seems to be well educated, much more than most.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Simulation and multiverse are secular copes, doomed attempts to escape the realities of and then the personal responsibilities to a creator God.

The universe is spooky, and consciousness porous, because this Spirit and the lesser gods, faithful and fallen, are real. Best is to accept the telos of life is theosis to the Logos of John 1. And when you encounter an entity, demand to know whom they serve.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redstone is operating on a different plane than the rest of us.
Apache
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I starred his post because I need more of that as I search for my telos.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At the risk of going full Spyderman, I'm sharing here only because this seems to be getting some legit traction and, if somehow true, would almost assuredly be related to this subject in some way, shape, or form...






MDPI - "Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza"
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What do remote viewers say is down there?
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you watch the YouTube video, you'll see actual Silos under the pyramid, complete with "spiral pathways".
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right. Are you laughing at the idea in general or something else?
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Right. Are you laughing at the idea in general or something else?
Having fun with the visual similarity to a certain popular Apple TV+ show and wondering if anybody was sent out to clean occasionally.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ahhh. Went right over my head, but that's pretty funny.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are the scans new, or is this all based on that 2022 study? Not that it matters, much.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I understand it, I *think* the scans are from 2022, but they only just released their findings this month.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redline248 said:

Are the scans new, or is this all based on that 2022 study? Not that it matters, much.
Seems to be new. The 2022 study focused solely on the "big" Cheops pyramid. This new imaging is on the Khafre pyramid.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Ahhh. Went right over my head, but that's pretty funny.
Looks like Silos to me!

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This guy is an expert who analyzes UAP videos in pragmatic, no-frills fashion, and touches on the pyramid thing below. He says he hasn't yet come across all the raw data from the study, but he provides an easily digestible descriptor of how this scanning technology works, seems open to the possibility, etc...

Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree with him on the foundation pier system. That would make sense.

I hope there is something more to it, but as a structural engineer, a pier system to support the pyramids sounds accurate.

Regardless, it is a major discovery whatever they are.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, that would make sense. That said, I'm almost more mystified by the depth, seeing as the structures apparently run 2000 feet deep, which is insane. I just don't see how that was feasible back then, without some kind of advanced technology.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?







TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Yes, a wild new story is circulating about the Pyramids of Giza!: the enormous vertical cylindrical structures found 648 meters below the Giza Pyramid. The entire underground system reportedly stretches about 2 kilometers beneath all three Egyptian pyramids.

A group of researchers, including Corrado Malanga from the University of Pisa and Filippo Biondi from the University of Strathclyde, used advanced radar technology called Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to study the Great Pyramid of Giza.

Their study, published in 2022, revealed hidden structures inside the pyramid that weren't visible with traditional methods.

arxiv.org/abs/2208.00811

Biondi also developed special software that converts radar signals into sound-like data, helping to detect tiny vibrations. This technology allowed them to uncover underground structures that had never been seen before.

Recently, they used this same technology to explore the Khafre Pyramid - the second-largest pyramid at Giza.

A press release on March 15, 2025 explained that the team created a 3D model of the inside of the pyramid and the area beneath it.

They found five identical structures connected by geometric pathways near the base of the pyramid. Each structure has five horizontal levels and a sloped roof. Below these are eight vertical, hollow, cylindrical structures, like wells, arranged in two parallel rows.

These wells spiral downward to a depth of 648 meters, ending in two large cube-shaped structures, each about 80 meters wide. The entire underground system stretches about 2 kilometers beneath all three pyramids at Giza.

Traditional Egyptology teaches that the pyramids were built as tombs for the pharaohs using ramps and levers around 2500 BC. However, the complex mathematical patterns found in the pyramids - including references to Pi, the golden ratio, and even the speed of light - suggest the official story might not explain everything. Some researchers believe the pyramids served a more advanced, possibly technological purpose.

For example, Nikola Tesla once suggested that the pyramids might harness the Earth's natural energy. Christopher Dunn proposed that the Great Pyramid functioned as a power plant, turning vibrations into electricity.

Joseph Farrell even theorized that it might have been a powerful weapon, focusing energy using an ancient type of physics. The newly discovered cylindrical wells could act as channels for energy or sound waves, while the cube structures might store or stabilize this energy - similar to a large power generator or even a weapon.

The research team wants to excavate the area to learn more, but getting permission for such a project is historically very difficult. This report came from Greg Reese, who funds his work through subscriptions on Substack.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wonder if they are columns or if they are wells like he mentioned in one of the posts.
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Yeah, that would make sense. That said, I'm almost more mystified by the depth, seeing as the structures apparently run 2000 feet deep, which is insane. I just don't see how that was feasible back then, without some kind of advanced technology.
I think the radar technology is greatly overestimating its depth. Two thousand meters is not possible. In one of the videos above, they question the depth this radar anccurately estimates.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Click the first image to see the true scale...

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I still don't know where I stand on all this. I see some people saying conclusions are being jumped to based on next to no provided data yet, but then I see others saying there's new data that lends all kinds of credibility to the claims. I haven't had time to dig through it all, and I probably couldn't understand half of it if I did. As of now, I'm just waiting for more credible sources to continue to weigh in.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is just click bait.

I doubt the guy that posted that and came up with those scales of reference knows anything about what he is posting. He doesn't know jack sh*(.

if they installed some type of pier system under the Giza pyramids, that is a breakthrough discovery alone. No need to sensationalize it as he did.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The original study says 648 meters, which equates to 2125 feet, which is what this guy is attempting to depict in his mockups.

It's not "click bait."

He's not "sensationalizing" anything.

Now, the original study may very well prove to be bull****, but this guy is just the messenger, so to speak, and attempting to visually show the already reported scale, based on the original report's numbers.

Either way, why stuff like this seemingly makes some of you react this way is beyond me.

We're just having a conversation here.

Again, maybe it's bull****, maybe it's not.

Time will tell.
Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed on the conversation, but I try to keep it real.

All this guy did is take the most ridiculous data projection and put it on a visual scaled for further shock value, even though he doesn't understand how ridiculous it is.

The whole 2 km depth is just stupid. Its ridiculous on so many levels.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ridiculous or not, it's what the original study says.

He's not pulling those numbers out of his ass.

Again, the original report might be pulling the numbers out of their ass, but not this guy.

That said... UAPs, space aliens, inter-dimensional beings, Roswell, a covert reverse engineering program, telepathy, etc... it's all "ridiculous on so many levels," yet here we are, with all kinds of credible reports backing those things up.

Of all things, I don't know why you're suddenly up in arms about this 2000 feet thing, or why that's any less believable than anything else we've been discussing here for years now.
Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I"m new to this forum.

"Credible reports" is about as generous description as someone could make on many of these topics.

I am not up in arms about anything, just stating when something is bat sh*t nuts.

If there is UAP's, telepathy, believe it or not I am all for it. As for as UAP's, there should be some tangible physical proof, there isn't, in any country around the world. People have been around for thousands of years, and now telepathy is a new found human ability, and mostly what I have seen is some videos by a certain group with a handful of people and listened to a couple podcasts.

Like I said, if there is anything below the pyramids, even if its piers, that is a major discovery. I am not diminishing it.

I am also not going into the land of myths and legends.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?


TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 155 of 181
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.