Entertainment
Sponsored by

*** UAP THREAD ***

641,806 Views | 6311 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by Agador Spartacus
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interdimensional bandwaggoners
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This that alien looking mother****er who isn't real?

Rustys-Beef-o-Reeno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Bisbee said:

This that alien looking mother****er who isn't real?




Would
Apache
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is that the Goodyear Blimp viewed from head on?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could be?

Definitely a good guess.

Though it also looks exactly like the metallic spheres so many people continue to see and document all over the world.

Just thought it was interesting in that regard.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Everyone,

We want to share an update and address some of the questions we've seen online.

We believe that Skywatcher has made real progress in understanding the Phenomenon.

While we can't respond to every comment, our top priority is to validate our work and then effectively share and communicate those findings with you.

Upcoming Releases

Releases have been slightly delayed, and we acknowledge that. We're dealing with a highly complicated subject that involves us both trying to simultaneously manage our operations and compose media that accurately communicates our progress.

Despite the silence, progress has been tremendous. We are working to improve our systems and processes to communicate more effectively moving forward.

We want to share our work with you as much as you want to see it. We also acknowledge the criticism that is inherent with this topic. We don't want to put out work that we are not proud of, and that we cannot stand behind. Our entire team has been working around the clock in an effort to make meaningful progress towards our objectives.

Here is the final immediate release schedule:

1. The Skywatcher Disclosure Framework whitepaper will be released next week.

2. Skywatcher Part II (video) is complete and will be released the following week (April 7th).

We'd also like to provide some clarity by briefly addressing comments we've seen online:

Our Intent. Our commitment is to engage with the Phenomenon peacefully and with a spirit of collaboration and discovery. Our focus is on data collection and understandingnothing more, nothing less. There will be no hostile actions taken toward anything in the sky. @theprojectunity raised an important point about concerns over defensive postures. Any protective measures you may notice are strictly for safety in the face of unknown or unforeseen circumstances. We are working in real-time with an unpredictable Phenomenon, and ensuring a secure environment for all involved is essential.

Our interactions with the Phenomenon are governed by a clear ethical framework rooted in peaceful engagement. We approach this work with a commitment to honesty, collaboration, and responsible stewardship of any information or experiences that may arise. Every team member maintains full presence and intentionality during observations, balancing open-minded curiosity with critical thinking. While we maintain a strict non-aggression policy, we acknowledge the importance of appropriate boundaries. Our engagement is characterized by patience, emotional composure, and a recognition that truly understanding the Phenomenon requires us to embody the same integrity and respect we hope to establish in any potential interaction. This ethical foundation guides every aspect of our work, from data collection to public communication.

Our Process. We are continuously refining our approach and taking every necessary precaution to ensure the integrity and safety of our work. We are private citizens engaging in a research project out in the open for the public to see. We do not claim to have all the answers about the Phenomenon. We are in pursuit of that knowledge, the same as you, and we intend to share what we find with all of you.

Our Approach. At Skywatcher, we are committed to rigorous scientific principles in all our work. Our methodology adheres to the fundamental tenets of the scientific method: systematic observation, measurement, experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses. This is why we're taking the time to ensure our data collection and analysis meet the highest standards of scientific inquiry. Exploring the unknown requires a careful, deliberate, and measured approach.

Going forward, we are dedicated to empirical evidence, peer review, and transparent reporting. We understand that advancing our knowledge of the Phenomenon requires methodical, evidence-based investigation that can withstand scrutiny from the broader scientific community. This commitment to scientific rigor guides every aspect of our work, even as we push the frontier and take on a uniquely challenging mission of exploration.

Media. Some have asked why we need a full-time producer. The reality is that this subject has been heavily stigmatized. If we want to engage not only those who already believe but also those who are justifiably skeptical, we need to present our findings in a way that is clear, compelling, and responsible.

For those wondering why we don't simply "release the data," the truth isit's not that simple. The Phenomenon appears unpredictably, sometimes only as a brief flash of light in the distance, often evading traditional detection. This isn't a "point-and-shoot" situation. If you've ever tried to capture something fleeting at great distance, you'll understand why raw data alone isn't always meaningful or convincing.

We are using the best technology available, but detecting and documenting high-speed aerial phenomena remains a challenge. Our goal is to capture a robust, high-quality dataset that can be independently analyzed and evaluated.

Together, we stand at the threshold of confirming profound truths about our reality. This journey requires a global community of open minds and rigorous thinkers.

Skywatcher aims to serve as the vanguard of this collective effort - join us as we seek a deeper understanding of our universe and our place within it. Follow our progress, engage with our findings, and be part of this historic exploration.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1joc16c/garry_nolan_was_threathened_with_death_by_someone
donkeykick90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For those of you who have listened to the Telepathy tapes. In episodes 7/8 Kai interviews Joe Infranco. He's a minster that works closely with nonspeaking autistic kid and shares his perspective on their psi abilities.


He was recently on Blurry Creatures podcast sharing more on how he connects the Christian faith with the psi abilities in these kids. I know not everyone here is Christian or believes in Christ, but this is a pretty good episode and hopefully further cements any doubts you might have on these special abilities.

Worth a listen!
LISTEN Blurry Creatures
EP: 314 Mind Readers: The Telepathy Tapes Uncensored with Joe Infranco
Clear Eyes. Full Heart. Might Lose
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have solid evidence for nuclear something on Mars. Seriously. Check it out.

Makes Tim Alberino's Rahab hypothesis more fascinating.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rjhtamu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Happy First Contact Day!
April 5th, 2063

Star Trek: First Contact in symphony orchestra
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm constantly going back and forth on Lazar, but this at least does look interesting/well done...



AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My thoughts on Lazar are that he would not have been harassed by gov agencies as much as he was if he was completely full of crap.
But as with anything in the craziness that is this topic, I watch it with interest and an open mind while not fully trusting anything
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lazar is legitimate because his story has been consistent, the credentials issue has been resolved IMO, he really did take people to a predicted test run, Knapp heavily verifies to the best of his ability and is honest with legit sourcing, AND there are photographs of him at secure facilities.
FRESH CLEMENTINES
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has anyone in this thread claimed to have seen a UFO?
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I ain't your research b****.

Do your own homework…
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree that he's remained consistent, but I haven't ever seen where his credential issues have been resolved, especially his claims of attending certain schools like MIT.

That said, I've come around to the idea that if he had exactly the skillset they were looking for, the powers-that-be might actually hire someone with such a sketch background, if only because it could give them leverage over someone like that.

That, and I agree that he's worked at secure facilities, one of those possibly even being Area 51. But I read a story a while back from someone in that world who knew him who says Lazar might very well have been a temporary contractor at Area 51, in a completely different capacity, for an extremely limited time (though long enough to know various test flight schedules, hence taking people to watch), and could have easily made up the whole alien craft part.

I'm not saying that's what he did, I'm just pointing out that he was an objectively shady dude back then, who got mixed up in all kinds of crazy ****, and seems to have almost certainly embellished his university credentials. He literally owned a brothel at one point, while his ex-wife committed suicide in suspicious fashion two days after he married their former assistant. So it's not out of the the realm of possibility that around that exact same time he also decided to make up a crazy story about reverse engineering alien craft, only to have it "go viral" and thus have keep up the ruse for decades now.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do think Rogan / Knapp have properly and comprehensively addressed the issues, including him not being the greatest guy 30 or so years ago. I wont locate the clips, but Lazar just via his guests has been verified enough for me.

The only borderline fellow I truly can't stand is Greer, and the larger point : if you've been proven JUST ONCE to be a fraud, and / or financial direct incentive, you're out. Jimmy Akin did a good number on him (and he's still on the periphery of legitimate given some of his associates).

This is why The Phenomenon is so difficult: material and spiritual mixed up, high interest, and so room for legit and fraud, sometimes in the same person and space, shading in and out.
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiebird02 said:

I ain't your research b****.

Do your own homework…


About 15 years ago, outside of Austin, I saw 5-6 crescent shaped lights slowly spinning then straightening up, then spinning again. Then they all lined up and shot straight up and they were gone. Would have thought I was just seeing things but other people close by said they saw it too.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see UFOs all the time. It's strange how they fly around areas near airports, dontcha think?
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiebird02 said:

I see UFOs all the time. It's strange how they fly around areas near airports, dontcha think?


This was west of Austin. Not close to Bergstrom.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haven't had a chance to watch this yet, but definitely will tomorrow.

Thanks for posting.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrapevineAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ever watched a dog or cat chase a laser pointer? Those things can change direction in an instant and move at insane speeds. If the red dot had mass (beyond that of a few photons), it'd break the known laws of physics.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interested to see how Jesse handles Greer, specifically his rambling and name-dropping.

Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 156 of 181
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.