I watched a little of the B Team yesterday, and from that, together with some of Brauny's posts, it's a little more complicated than straight revenue share division.
Under the House settlement, there is a $20.5 million pool mostly for revenue sharing, but you can also increase the number of full ride scholarships to the roster limit; my understanding is that, if you do increase scholarships, then your revenue sharing pool is $18.5 million (essentially, $2 million from revenue sharing is applied to scholarships). A&M chose to increase scholarships, so we are only dividing $18.5 million. Since baseball is getting so many of those scholarships (we've gone from 11.7 to 34, or whatever the roster limit is), we are not giving baseball very much in revenue sharing. We are making up for that by doing all that we can do (within the rules) on NIL. So, baseball players at A&M are getting a full ride, maybe a small slice of revenue sharing, and NIL money.
Surprisingly, not all the big baseball school opted to immediately go to full rides for the roster. The Horns didn't; they are "stair stepping" it over few years. Tennessee is apparently doing the same. So, without everyone getting a full ride, your revenue share becomes a big deal. Vitello wasn't happy that women's basketball players (who all get a full ride) are getting multiple times what his baseball players (many on partial scholarships) are getting in revenue sharing.