Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Cam Coleman vs Isaiah Horton

15,416 Views | 86 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by Admiral Nelson
dcg4403
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:01p, 1/11/26
AG
We weren't getting both with #1 Carver waiting to start.

I looked at both and they seem to be very comparable.

On paper, I would actually pick Horton.

Seems Coleman was also one of those "highest bidder" type of players. Hate that Texas got him but think we got the far better value. Texas blew some serious, serious cash on Coleman. Sark seems a bit desperate but not quite as desperate as Kiffin. Their OL is gonna be a huge weakness, yet, again.
Reply Quote
22
1 edit
Matsui
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:02p, 1/11/26
AgSnacks16
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:03p, 1/11/26
AG
QB play between Auburn and Alabama was not comparable. Both are good players, but don't look to hard at the stats.
Reply Quote
18
NoahAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:06p, 1/11/26
Horton obviously.
Heisman. Give it to him.
Reply Quote
7
dcg4403
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgSnacks16 • 6:07p, 1/11/26
AG
AgSnacks16 said:
QB play between Auburn and Alabama was not comparable. Both are good players, but don't look to hard at the stats.


Simpson struggled with the deep ball. Horton has insanely good hands. But gotcha considering Auburns horrific QB play.

Physically, Horton gets the nod IMO. Certainly size wise with equivalent 40 times. Moffit can hopefully do wonders for him.
Reply Quote
4
The Collective
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:10p, 1/11/26
AG
Both good players. I'm glad we got one.
Reply Quote
48
Tamuco99
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:17p, 1/11/26
This is a weak take. Cam is by far the superior player, no need to pretend otherwise. Horton may very well excel here and have a great season, but let's not be ridiculous because if Coleman had committed here you'd be ecstatic.
Reply Quote
57
redjalapeno-87
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:17p, 1/11/26
Horton has the prototype big WR body that this roster needs. He has all the tools. Very smooth player. Makes it look easy.
Reply Quote
11
Eagle78
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:23p, 1/11/26
Football is won in the trenches. Assume our OL really excels but tu's OL sucks next year. That happens and I can guarantee you that Horton will look like a much better player than Coleman.
Reply Quote
26
AccAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tamuco99 • 6:35p, 1/11/26
AG
You must have just started watching football yesterday or something.
Reply Quote
10
83Aggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tamuco99 • 6:43p, 1/11/26
AG
Tamuco99 said:
This is a weak take. Cam is by far the superior player, no need to pretend otherwise. Horton may very well excel here and have a great season, but let's not be ridiculous because if Coleman had committed here you'd be ecstatic.

Horton had 511 yds on 42 receptions in '25. 8 TDS. 12.2 yds avg.

Coleman had 708 yds on 56 receptions. 5 TDS. 12.6 avg.

Not by much if you look at the stats. Plus you get to free up $$ for DTs
Reply Quote
12
Lurker44
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:06p, 1/11/26
I don't think there is much difference talent wise but a lot of difference NIL wise
Reply Quote
6
BigT29
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tamuco99 • 7:09p, 1/11/26
AG
Tamuco99 said:
This is a weak take. Cam is by far the superior player, no need to pretend otherwise. Horton may very well excel here and have a great season, but let's not be ridiculous because if Coleman had committed here you'd be ecstatic.


Far superior in what way? Speed? No. Size? No. Production? No. No one said we wouldn't be ecstaticif we landed Coleman wr would have been. But its okay to be thrilled with a bigger faster more productive SEC player that was way cheaper. Coleman was WR #1 Horton was a #2.
Reply Quote
14
1 edit
agchugger
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:10p, 1/11/26
AG
We would have taken Coleman in a NY minute and still pursued the same other players in the portal that were pursuing. Y'alll are working some amazing mental gymnastics here. Did you forget there is no cap in college football?
Reply Quote
10
Stone44
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:10p, 1/11/26
AG
Little arch can't throw lying on his back. That's the key to everything.
Reply Quote
5
soleta27
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:13p, 1/11/26
For highlights and explosives- Coleman

For consistency, possession type, 1st down/TD maker- Horton

I wish I could find drop pass stats, but just based on memory I feel Auburn fans were pissed on how many Coleman had on should be catches
Reply Quote
5
vander54
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to agchugger • 7:14p, 1/11/26
S
That's not how it works. We still have an internal cap. We weren't taking Coleman and another WR.
World's worst proofreader
Reply Quote
9
Justice Beaver
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Stone44 • 7:15p, 1/11/26
AG
Stone44 said:
Little arch can't throw lying on his back. That's the key to everything.


FIFY
Reply Quote
1
agchugger
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to vander54 • 7:16p, 1/11/26
AG
vander54 said:
That's not how it works. We still have an internal cap. We weren't taking Coleman and another WR.


Ok my dude.
Reply Quote
3
halfastros81
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:18p, 1/11/26
AG
We got a big experienced slot receiver with good speed . Need filled .
Reply Quote
4
Fishwrangler11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:18p, 1/11/26
AG
Cam would have been great, Horton is what we needed, possession and size receiver. We have explosive speed with ABR and Mario. We just need a reliable big target with actual speed (not lumbering like freak CKs TE centric offense) and with great hands (Cam had 6 drops/Isaiah had 0 drops). Also, hope it allows us to put the remaining funds toward great use (ie RB and DLine/LB depth)
Reply Quote
8
1 edit
AggieMD95
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:37p, 1/11/26
AG
What's the size difference here ?
Reply Quote
1
BigT29
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AggieMD95 • 7:41p, 1/11/26
AG
AggieMD95 said:
What's the size difference here ?


Coleman 6'2 anywhere between 195-200

Horton 6'4 anywhere from 210-220 both run in the mid 4.4a
Reply Quote
6
vander54
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to agchugger • 7:43p, 1/11/26
S
agchugger said:
vander54 said:
That's not how it works. We still have an internal cap. We weren't taking Coleman and another WR.


Ok my dude.


Sorry to disappoint you
World's worst proofreader
Reply Quote
2
TexanJeff
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:56p, 1/11/26
AG
Coleman was much more heralded coming out of High School and excelled past two years with mediocre at best QBs. He was highly sought after for a reason

Horton COULD be every bit as good, like the fact that Wiggy likely thinks he can maximize his potential.
Nothing says excellence like a Blue Diamond
Reply Quote
3
Chris Knight
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:01p, 1/11/26
AG
Coleman has more potential but Horton has proven to be a little more productive and dependable. Plus Horton was cheaper. This was the best option. What would Cignetti have done? You know the answer.
Reply Quote
5
TheGigEm
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:40p, 1/11/26
Horton and Coleman have a similar skills set. Coleman is probably a slightly better player oveall, but I like Horton's fit better with Reed; particularly his hands.
Reply Quote
3
NyAggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:42p, 1/11/26
AG
Coleman is the higher upside player but I think Horton will fit in perfectly in our offense

I think we'll look back at the end of next season and be happy with Horton
Reply Quote
3
The Collective
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:21p, 1/11/26
AG
The biggest negative with not getting Cam is he is now on our schedule.
Reply Quote
3
Bunk Moreland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The Collective • 9:22p, 1/11/26
The Collective said:
The biggest negative with not getting Cam is he is now on our schedule.


He has already been on our schedule.
Reply Quote
20
vander54
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The Collective • 9:23p, 1/11/26
S
He is way overpriced though

I think tu's strategy will eventually backfire on them.
World's worst proofreader
Reply Quote
8
cevans_40
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to NyAggie • 9:27p, 1/11/26
AG
NyAggie said:
Coleman is the higher upside player but I think Horton will fit in perfectly in our offense

I think we'll look back at the end of next season and be happy with Horton

Genuinely curious as to why you think he has the higher upside?
Reply Quote
1
NyAggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cevans_40 • 9:40p, 1/11/26
AG
cevans_40 said:
NyAggie said:
Coleman is the higher upside player but I think Horton will fit in perfectly in our offense

I think we'll look back at the end of next season and be happy with Horton

Genuinely curious as to why you think he has the higher upside?


Based on what everyone in cfb thinks of him

He was the most sought after player in the portal
This go round for a reason

Reply Quote
5
agchugger
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:51p, 1/11/26
AG
You guys realize Horton finished third in receiving behind Bernard and Williams…. And Williams was blasted for his drops and sophomore slump. And bama had almost 600 more yards passing than us. Auburn finished more than 1000 yards behind us (so 1600 behind bama) and Coleman had more yards receiving. Horton is a nice player but he isn't near the level of Coleman. Why is Horton going to be better with us when he was on a more productive passing offense this year?? I think he'll finish about the same 500-600 yards receiving fo 2nd or 3rd behind Craver and maybe ABR.
Reply Quote
10
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:03p, 1/11/26
AG
Whoever is throwing the ball to them is gonna have a helluva lot to do with their productivity
Reply Quote
6
Last Page
Page 1 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.