Can't challenge.

They can't really afford to take a shot at the end zone unless they are comfortable kicking a 57 yarder. A nine route will take 6ish seconds and then you have to just kick.

We should be blitzing here to knock them out of FG range. Who cares if they pick up 20 yards…

NukeAg10 said:

---

Can't challenge.

---

Oh

NFL only does reviews in last two minutes. That should have been measured.

They have that Hawkeye thing. Maybe they did look.

"Youtube TV is at it again" seems Iike an unprofessional way to phrase an annoying scrolling banner.

Can't believe they are doing this when they could have 10-15 free yards every time they throw if they want

That is also intentional grounding.

That was very strange end of game management

Teams don't miss big kicks against the cowboys.

PLEASE miss it

Called it.

No it's not there was a receiver there

Scored too ****ing fast

Chip shot

Cowboys play defense challenge: impossible

Seven Costanza said:

---

"Youtube TV is at it again" seems Iike an unprofessional way to phrase an annoying scrolling banner.

---

I went to that website and it's terribly designed. Not sure who is behind it but yikes!

Gotta hope Dallas gets the ball 2nd

Not that it matters much since that would have been good from 65, but that was grounding on that last pass

If I'm Dallas, I want the ball…give D a chance to rest…

It's 2025. That's an almost automatic kick indoors in the NFL. We already blocked a kick, so you know they will change their timing.

We should have been way more aggressive defensively once they got to about the 40.

Glad to see the roof open tonight

It is crazy that a 52 yard field goal is nothing now.

Can they sustain a drive and chew up clock?

Danny Vermin said:

---

It is crazy that a 52 yard field goal is nothing now.

---

That was a beautiful kick.

thegoodolag15 said:

---

No it's not there was a receiver there

---

You can't intentionally throw the ball to the crowd from the pocket with a rusher bearing down on you. It meets every criteria for grounding. A player in the vicinity doesn't matter if the ball is intentionally thrown out of bounds. "In the vicinity" means "has a reasonable chance of catching the ball" per the rules which doesn't apply to ball intentionally thrown away out of bounds.

You'll see it called every now and then especially when a QB just fires the ball out of the back of the end zone to avoid a sack.

Of course there's a flag. Why the **** not?

Obvious hold… so dumb

Flag

My word Javonte…

I understand the guaranteed possession for Packers.

What happens is Dallas has a ten minute drive?

Is it primarily when a QB is pressured? I honestly don't think I've ever seen it called when a QB throws it out of the back of the end zone.

Danny Vermin said:

---

It is crazy that a 52 yard field goal is nothing now.

---

Anything under 55 has been routine in the NFL for 20+ years.

It's been game over, if the cowboys scored and killed all the clock.