DannyDuberstein said:
They should have traded him in one of the past 2 offseasons. Between his inability to deliver all season (which is unlikely to get batter all season + his age), I can't justify seeing over $40mm of cap going to him. But if you were going to keep him, the signing should have been done this spring.
They'll get him signed, but he's never going to not be a headache
This is what I was thinking. If they've known for 2 years they were going to play hardball with him, why not just trade him when his value was highest? You could have got maybe 3 first rounders plus a second or third and now you will be lucky to get 2 first rounders (assuming he's actually being traded now).