DannyDuberstein said:
I really enjoyed both (recent) movies even though the 2nd had a lot of haters. But if takes enjoying easter eggs to be the difference between good and bad, that's a fail. That said, I'm sticking with it and hopeful it rallies.
I think it will ultimately just feel like an extension to the movie -- which isn't necessarily a bad thing if you liked the movie, just going to get very repetitive. It's going to be kids going through various experiences with It, with an attempt to weave a Kingverse crossover into everything.
I like King, but his universe is more easter-eggy as you say than actually fleshed out. Certain names make certain appearances in multiple stories, but it doesn't really serve the story much at all.
So sure it's neat that the guy who helps Danny at the Overlook in 40 years is showing where previously he's used his "shine", it's all being retrofitted and that's just not King's forte. King loves the idea of the multiverse, but he's never shown he's capable of actually mapping it out competently. Instead you get a Patrick Danville character that 10 years later King uses as a deus ex machina in the ultimate battle of his magnum opus.