Lathan and JC definitely had a chance to win it
I am shocked JC lost that match. Definitely allowed Frusina to get under his skin.mullokmotx said:
Frusina for Auburn was excessively enthusiastic. Was worried Roddick might get penalized in his 3rd set; he seemed pretty upset after a call by the chair. Tokac had 2 match points in his second set. It was closer than 5-2 with 3 matches going to a 3rd set.
I was shocked as well. Frusina is from Conroe so I'm sure he had some motivation to play well against the "hometown" team. I think Roddick wins that match 9 of 10 times.aggiedrjdub said:I am shocked JC lost that match. Definitely allowed Frusina to get under his skin.mullokmotx said:
Frusina for Auburn was excessively enthusiastic. Was worried Roddick might get penalized in his 3rd set; he seemed pretty upset after a call by the chair. Tokac had 2 match points in his second set. It was closer than 5-2 with 3 matches going to a 3rd set.
Need to figure out how to win a doubles point. Last year's women's team struggled to win a doubles point, too, but were so strong in singles they could win most matches. Looks like the men are similar as well. Ended in a natty though so I would be fine with no doubles wins hahablake2003 said:I was shocked as well. Frusina is from Conroe so I'm sure he had some motivation to play well against the "hometown" team. I think Roddick wins that match 9 of 10 times.aggiedrjdub said:I am shocked JC lost that match. Definitely allowed Frusina to get under his skin.mullokmotx said:
Frusina for Auburn was excessively enthusiastic. Was worried Roddick might get penalized in his 3rd set; he seemed pretty upset after a call by the chair. Tokac had 2 match points in his second set. It was closer than 5-2 with 3 matches going to a 3rd set.
Overall, I agree that it was closer than 5-2 indicates, and it seems Auburn is pretty young overall. Will be interesting to see if that roster develops over the next two years.
Tomorrow will be interesting with Florida.
Chruchie said:
i've learned not to ask "Why?" with Denton. he does things that make no sense. some of them work, but more times than not they are a miss
You aren't kidding.aggiedrjdub said:
That was the definition and result of two singles players playing together that don't understand doubles. That was hard to watch.
Magadan has played doubles the last two matches.Ag4eva95 said:
I think they need to incorporate Alan into the doubles lineup eventually. He's too good to sit. If this team becomes dominate at doubles which I think they can, it's hard to find 3, even 4 singles points.
Do you know if anything happened to Gulio? He has regressed so much since year 1. Crazy that he was once the #3 prospect in the country
Agree - if we've decided on Lathan in doubles (very well deserved), he needs to play with a partner that values him. There is nothing worse than playing doubles with someone that thinks they are too good to play with you, doesn't communicate, and looks like they are miserable being out there (shoulders down, negative talk, etc).bigfoot10s said:
I just think that you have to go with what's been working. Not winning, but working. Won't win them all.
Today was a good chance to get at least two teams some good reps. Instead you split up JC/Lathan into two teams that found out they're playing together yesterday. I do understand that you want to rest guys, and that's fine. But making all brand new teams is dumb.
Lathan is one of the top 3 doubles only players on the team. The coaches have said that. Leave him and JC together and get a good match before SEC this weekend.
No clue on Giulio.