Only at 42 in the NET, expected a bit more movement up with the Quad 1 win.

At 14-4 overall and 2-3 in quad 1 and 3-1 in quad 2, we are one NET spot below Texas who is 10-7, 3-4, and 0-2 in same categories.

texas is also 0-1 in Q3, interesting that they are still ahead of us.

NET does not rise and fall based on quad wins. Its only purpose is to define the quads.

NET is an efficiency ranking. If the 40th team beats the 41st team by one possession its not gonna change at all. It would only move if one of those teams beats the other by like 25 or if like 40th beat number 5.

we did move up six spots, 48 > 42 and tu dropped from 39 > 41

Yeah, while its efficiency based, it does weight extra points for winning on the road so that did help us more than it likely hurt Texas

Still at 42 in NET

20 point Quad 3 win at home not helping

Complete Idiot said:

---

Still at 42 in NET

20 point Quad 3 win at home not helping

---

Saturday won't help either

Complete Idiot said:

---

Still at 42 in NET

20 point Quad 3 win at home not helping

---

a loss would have hurt tremendously, so treading water is a fine tradeoff

Even though Miss St is at 98 in the NET, I still thought more than doubling the spread might help a bit - I've heard margin of victory helps, even if it's a Quad 3 or 4 opponent.

even a close win we likely would've dropped a spot or two

AggieCrew44 said:

---

We'd be sitting fine if we hadn't blown that UCF game

---

Could have easily won SMU and Tennessee to!

But, basketball be like that…

Also gotta remember the NET is moving target and everyone's data affects everyone else. Texas loses a game last night, Pitt loses again, etc.

Tennessee, Auburn, and Texas - 2 opponents we beat on the road and another we took to OT on the road - had very solid wins yesterday.

We beat an SEC opponent by 23.


In the NET, we held steady at 41.

Complete Idiot said:

---

Tennessee, Auburn, and Texas - 3 opponents we beat - had very solid wins yesterday.

We beat an SEC opponent by 23.


In the NET, we held steady at 41.

---

We didn't beat Tennessee.

TonyD33 said:

---

Complete Idiot said:

---

Tennessee, Auburn, and Texas - 3 opponents we beat - had very solid wins yesterday.

We beat an SEC opponent by 23.


In the NET, we held steady at 41.

---

We didn't beat Tennessee.

---

Oops, brain fart - I guess I was thinking taking them to OT on the road and then them beating UF on the road themselves would help and I turned that into "we beat" in my head. And to be honest, I'm not even sure our OT with them and them doing better after that game would even help in the NET. It just helps in my personal opinion, maybe.

I'll edit the original and keep this here for historical idiocy proof.

The NET does seem to be stickier than the other ratings system, probably because it weights all the games the same as opposed to the others which diminish games over time.