Conference Realignment Pipe Dreams

830 Views | 8 Replies | Last: 8 days ago by ayybates
TPS_Report
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you had a magic wand, how would you configure the conferences? For me this would be the ideal setup:



In my world, the remaining schools get dropped into a lower division and do their own thing (shoulda joined a power conference, Notre Dame). For the Power 5, each school plays their entire conference (11 games). There is a 6-team playoff with the two top ranked conference champs getting byes and the two highest ranked non-champs getting into the field.



I bleed Maroon and I wipe burnt orange!
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did you purposely eliminate Oregon State?
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
TPS_Report
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UTExan said:

Did you purposely eliminate Oregon State?

No. They are right under Oregon. I just listed them as OSU for brevity.



I bleed Maroon and I wipe burnt orange!
Skubalon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I want to see something like this and I like your ideas.

Personally, I want to see 8 team conferences where every team plays every team.

In your alignment, I would improve it by putting all the teams into two six team divisions, and have the division champs play for the conference championship, with the conference championships acting as the first round of the playoffs.

With a 12 team conference it makes the probability of 3+ way ties more likely and make it harder to land on a true conference champion. With 6 team divisions and everyone playing everyone else in their division, it's a step closer to a non-poll or non-committee based national championship.

Make it so.
Skubalon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TPS_Report said:

For the Power 5, each school plays their entire conference (11 games).

This part would be a blocker for just about everybody, I think.

Let conference divisions of 6 teams each play everyone in their division, and then schedule other games as they wish. Because the division champs would play for the conference titles, if a Texas wants to schedule tOSU, that's on them, and good luck. But scheduling hard teams or cupcakes wouldn't matter because the division winners would sort it out on the field.

Just a thought.
South Platte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TPS_Report said:

If you had a magic wand, how would you configure the conferences? For me this would be the ideal setup:



In my world, the remaining schools get dropped into a lower division and do their own thing (shoulda joined a power conference, Notre Dame). For the Power 5, each school plays their entire conference (11 games). There is a 6-team playoff with the two top ranked conference champs getting byes and the two highest ranked non-champs getting into the field.

Given the NIL, stadium/resource size, there are many schools in that list that can no longer compete with the larger programs. It's completely the court ruling, NIL, NCAA, and ESPN's fault. They were hanging in there for decades, but now it's over for them.

Eliminate conference-based TV contracts and implement revenue sharing, then there might be a discussion for regionally based realignment.
JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we will see 4 13 team conferences in the future. It will be something like this:

Western
USCw, UCLA, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, ASU, Utah, BYU, CU, Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State

South
A&M, LSU, Arkansas, Ole Miss, Bama, Auburn, Tennessee, Georgia, Miami, Florida, Florida State, Clemson, USCe

East
Kentucky, Louisville, Indiana UNC, NC State, Georgia Tech, Virginia, Va Tech, Maryland, ND, Penn State, Pitt, WVU

North
Wisconsin, Michigan, MSU, Minnesota, Ohio State, Iowa, Illinois, Iowa State, Purdue, Mizzou, Nebraska, Kansas, Kansas State

Everyone plays 12 conference games, plus a game against each division, for a 15 game season. Division winners get byes, then the next best 8 play each other, all at home. Then, the division winners get a home game, then the NFL stadiums get the semifinals and championship game.
Skubalon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
South Platte said:

Given the NIL, stadium/resource size, there are many schools in that list that can no longer compete with the larger programs. It's completely the court ruling, NIL, NCAA, and ESPN's fault. They were hanging in there for decades, but now it's over for them.

Eliminate conference-based TV contracts and implement revenue sharing, then there might be a discussion for regionally based realignment.

I hate that this is true, but it is true. I am a Tech grad, and I am watching what Tech is doing with my mouth hanging open, because Tech is kicking its way into the old boy network that is college football. It's happening mostly because of Cody Campbell, and to a lesser but important degree, Patrick Mahomes (and lesser still, but important, a bunch of rabid Tech fans). Were it not for Campbell and Mahomes, however, Tech would be one of those teams that couldn't keep up. And it remains to be seen how long we can maintain our current trajectory. I hope it's a long time. Spending the same amount of money as Texas, A&M, Georgia, tOSU, Alabama, LSU, Michigan, etc. isn't enough - Tech has to outspend them. And for this year at least, it's working.

But in the Big 12, as in much of the country, there are lots of schools that can't and will never be able to do what Tech is doing. They will become less and less relevant.

And the SEC especially hates what Tech is doing. HATE it. They led the charge to remove the conference champions from getting byes this year, and they are already pushing for another change to remove automatic qualifiers for the CFP.

The SEC was also pushing for a cap on NIL spending, in part as a response to what Tech did in the spring, but that isn't moving forward (yet). But they are also leading the movement to change athlete payment through revenue sharing, which will benefit teams with big stadiums and big media contracts more than smaller schools/conferences.

To their credit, the SEC is both smart and powerful. But it is also hurting the sport overall.

I think eventually there will be separate leagues similar to FBS vs FCS now, only with the top division being much smaller than the FBS currently is, and will likely be anchored by the SEC, B1G, and whatever schools they choose to cherry pick to bring with them.

Maybe that's the better thing anyway. That model would let smaller schools who don't have huge alumni bases with billionaire boosters to compete on a level playing field. It remains to be seen whether Tech would be invited to play by our "superiors".

ayybates
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would do a very similar approach, but with 4 conferences of 16 rather than 5 conferences of 12.

Each team's schedule would be:
- 9 conference games
- 3 cross-conference games (1 for each of the other conferences)
- 2 cupcake games vs the now-split-off Group of 5 League

Perhaps a 14-game schedule is too brutal for college players, but with 16 team conferences, 9 games feels better than 8. This year in the big conferences, there have been lots of possible scenarios where 3 different teams are undefeated in conference play, which shouldn't be able to happen.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.