As someone who went through a hellish scenario, THIS.
neutics said:YouBet said:Quote:
Thanks, and that was part of my point in that fee structure simply doesn't exist nor would it be sustainable for a firm.
I would say I disagree with this because I have it and I know of others who also have this arrangement, but I haven't personally researched the options in several years to actually know who is out there doing it. Maybe it has become less common over time. I don't know.
I'll also add that the fee I'm charged is negotiable.
Fees are always negotiable, but the only way that arrangement works is if there are other hidden fees for products or funds, which is very likely at Goldman Sachs though their AUM fees are actually quite high
ToddyHill said:
We're looking at the taxes that would hit our heirs, primarily the Inherited IRA. Trump changed the law during his first administration. The monies in an Inherited IRA must be depleted over a ten year period (it used to be based on one's age and could be depleted over several years). That's the biggest issue we presently have.
Also, if we merged our brokerage accounts, the surviving spouse gets a step-up cost basis, which is huge (in our case anyway).
That's just a couple of the things we discussed...I'm sure they'll be more.
And just to be fair to the attorney that originally drew up our wills...we didn't share anything about our finances. We made the dumb assumption that a Will and a standard Revocable Trust would work for us. It doesn't. Like I said, we didn't share anything about our nest egg, and he never asked. At the end of the day the responsibility ultimately fell on me.