2025-26 NBA Highlight Thread

13,420 Views | 198 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by Poot
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



Thunder are a bunch of foul baiting dirty *****es.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Trae Young got ejected from a game before ever playing for the Wizards
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


The McCain trade might end up saving the one seed for OKC. With SGA, Jdub and Ajay all missing for extended stretches, playmaking was sorely lacking. McCain has filled in nicely.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Brother, if Denver/Minnesota keep that 4/5 slot, you can have the 1st seed.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's the draw I do not want. Would be hoping MIN-DEN slug eachother into oblivion like DEN-LAC last year.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Only question I have about this draw is: Will it be Dillon Brooks or Draymond Green that cheap shots Wemby into an injury in the first round?
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Refs don't want to call SGA with the 3rd foul in the 1st quarter.

SGA made the basket, Mike Brown got a technical because the refs ****ed up.

Thunder won by 3. This play was basically the difference in the game.



Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brunson would have been more likely to get that call if he didn't flop on the floor 100 times per game.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe said:

Brunson would have been more likely to get that call if he didn't flop on the floor 100 times per game.

While true... we've all see SGA play.



But even without Brunson's flopping, SGA went directly through his chest.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In all seriousness, arguing about fouls and foul narratives is very uninteresting to me. So I don't usually respond to your Thunder-related posts on here. There's 100 calls made every game, most of them are proper calls that we don't talk about. Inevitably the refs miss a few.

Rooting interest is the most accurate predictor of whether fans see a marginal call as a bad call or a proper call. Twitter algos are loaded with confirmation bias that can lead fans to think certain teams are receiving an epidemic of favorable or unfavorable calls. My feed looks very different than yours. And that's ok.

For every SGA flail, I can post a Jokic flail. Or a Brunson flop. Or a Lebron flop. For every "dirty" Lu play, I can post 10 other dirty plays around the league. It's all very boring to me and something I have zero interest in arguing about. Granted a six month regular season is alot of time to kill haha.

The Thunder are in the spotlight right now and I totally get it. They're on top. Alot of fans don't like them. They stole (and ate) alot of cake last year. Opposing players/coaches use officiating as an attack vector against them. As well they should. It's a competition.

Chris Finch or Mike Brown voicing an opinion doesn't prove or disprove a narrative. They're professionals doing a job of trying to give their teams the best chance to win.

To me, basketball is much more fun to observe through the lens of matchups and strategy. As frustrating as it's been to watch OKC at times this year, I've enjoyed watching them patch it together personnel-wise. It's forced them to make a few strategic pivots that I think will be helpful for them in the playoffs.

They've made their money the last few years on dominating turnovers and points off turnovers. Those margins have slipped this year and the league as a whole has 1) wised up and 2) gotten better (going b2b is very difficult in today's NBA). It's made it harder to justify playing guys who excel in forcing turnovers at the expense of guys who can create/score/shoot. I think/hope we see more of McCain/Ajay/Joe down the stretch, even if it means fewer minutes for Cason, Dort and Caruso.

I watched most of the game last night. To me the most interesting things were:

1) The Thunder/SGA trying to figure out how to move the ball in crunch time when SGA is getting doubled. Obviously this is something they will face in the playoffs. Losing Lu next year will be such an addition by subtraction in this department. It's so frustrating to watch defenses leave him, the ball rotates to him, someone closes out on him, then he tries to drive and kick (which he SUCKS at). It's the classic fan experience of "Lu, no, no, no, no" --> turnover lol. Daig is insistent on him being in the closing five though. Whatever.

2) Hartenstein might be out again. If he's not right in the playoffs, the Thunder aren't going to win the title. IMO the Thunder can win a title without Jdub, but they can't win without Hartenstein. They need his beef and paint presence.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

In all seriousness, arguing about fouls and foul narratives is very uninteresting to me. So I don't usually respond to your Thunder-related posts on here.

Yeah, you usually go with the passive aggressive pathway.
Quote:


Rooting interest is the most accurate predictor of whether fans see a marginal call as a bad call or a proper call.

Not really, but it certainly influences. We all see good and bad calls that have nothing at all to do with our rooting interest.

Quote:

For every SGA flail, I can post a Jokic flail. Or a Brunson flop. Or a Lebron flop.

This is whataboutism at its finest, and all of them are a scourge on the NBA and all should be given technicals, fines and ultimately suspensions for their antics that are in direct opposition to good sportsmanship and ethical basketball. All of them are awful.

Quote:

For every "dirty" Lu play, I can post 10 other dirty plays around the league.



It is amazing that OKC fans can't bring themselves to say Dort's play on Jokic was dirty when Dort himself said he crossed the line. If you don't care that he has no problem deliberately doing dangerous things with a high likelihood of injuring other players, that's fine. But the entirety of the rest of the league and all fandoms - INCLUDING DORT HIMSELF - will call it what it is.



Quote:

The Thunder are in the spotlight right now and I totally get it. They're on top. Alot of fans don't like them. They stole (and ate) alot of cake last year.

This isn't it, this is a deflection. People were saying the same thing about Dort and SGA years ago. It has nothing to do with success and everything to do with their actions.

Quote:

Chris Finch or Mike Brown voicing an opinion doesn't prove or disprove a narrative. They're professionals doing a job of trying to give their teams the best chance to win.

We don't need their words and no one is relying on their words. We can all use our own eyes.

Quote:

To me, basketball is much more fun to observe through the lens of matchups and strategy. As frustrating as it's been to watch OKC at times this year, I've enjoyed watching them patch it together personnel-wise. It's forced them to make a few strategic pivots that I think will be helpful for them in the playoffs.

What is not fun for most fans is when instead of focusing on basketball strategy, teams and players focus on exploiting weaknesses in officiating. What SGA does is just a continuation of what James Harden did in Houston and Harden was hated for the same thing. It wasn't because Harden won a lot of rings or was really successful. It was because Harden was actively working to trick and exploit the refs rather than focus on matchups and strategy. The OKC defense is somewhat similar in their hacking method that you see going off the belief that the refs won't call everything, if they do, they will naturally try to give makeup calls, refs (and the league) tend to want fewer FTs and stoppages, and the Thunder have significantly more depth so even if guys get in foul trouble, they have another man up. I think gameplanning to exploit the refs is repugnant (goes for LeBron, Jokic, Brunson too).

But I get that OKC fandom is an echo chamber. Just like the Rockets fandom was when they worshipped the ground that Harden walked on, even though what he did and really pioneered with the arm hook was the exact same thing that SGA copies now. Fans of all teams hated it then and hate it now.

The bigger thing is that OKC and SGA and Dort have all the talent to just match up and play ball and win. But they still lower themselves to this type of bull***** Fans hate it. It isn't just teams that are involved. It is league wide. But sometimes you can't see that when you are in your little algo echochamber.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Trae is back for Washington... as they lose to the Jazz.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Greatest thing Marcus Smart has done in his career.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Dort can't help himself.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not exactly a highlight but WTF were the Hawks thinking?

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/48156644/nba-cancels-atlanta-hawks-planned-magic-city-tribute-night
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NoahAg said:

Not exactly a highlight but WTF were the Hawks thinking?

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/48156644/nba-cancels-atlanta-hawks-planned-magic-city-tribute-night

The owner's wife is producing a documentary about Magic City, as pointed out in the article.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The end of the OKC Thunder was just wild.

Dort Flagrant by hitting Jokic in the face for no apparent reason.

Then fast forward to the end and SGA hits a step back three to go up four, Jokic returns the favor with a clutch three and JWill is dumb enough to offball foul during the shot, making it a 4-pt play. Then SGA nails ANOTHER three to end it.

NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LawHall88 said:

NoahAg said:

Not exactly a highlight but WTF were the Hawks thinking?

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/48156644/nba-cancels-atlanta-hawks-planned-magic-city-tribute-night

The owner's wife is producing a documentary about Magic City, as pointed out in the article.

Yeah, I read it. I get it. Pro players enjoy spending their money at strip clubs. But a NBA team celebrating a strip club as a theme night?! In what way is that a good idea?
Peter Piper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bam Adebayo dropped 83 pts on the Wizards tonight. It's the second most points scored after Wilt. Not a fan of Kobe so I'm glad he got bumped down to third.

CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Peter Piper said:

Bam Adebayo dropped 83 pts on the Wizards tonight. It's the second most points scored after Wilt. Not a fan of Kobe so I'm glad he got bumped down to third.



yeah, that damn Kobe, what a charmed life.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Show me a time when SGA shot 43 free throws in a game. I'll wait! (JK)

In all seriousness, my last post wasn't intended to be combative or passive aggressive. I'm genuinely sorry you took it that way. I'm too old to go hard on Texags these days. It kind of brings me back. I used to have a work/life that allowed for some time to get in here and mix it up a bit. Not so much anymore (hence the long delay in my response here ha).

The thing is, I don't disagree with a number of the points you made in your posts. I think we probably agree more than we disagree on Lu specifically. I agree that my pointing out that "others do it too" doesn't absolve him. It sometimes feels like he gets more attention for his bad behavior than others, but YOU have never made that argument. You've been plenty fair about calling out numerous guys around the league for their bad behavior.

To the extent there were Thunder echo chamber fans on X defending his Jokic trip or elbow to the face the other night, I disagree with those fans. Lu needs to be careful and clean his sh*t up a bit. Like I said in my previous post, I know he's very instrumental to the "culture" of the Thunder, but in many ways, I think him leaving will be an addition by subtraction.

There's probably some aspects of SGA and the "Thunder brand" of basketball specifically that we can agree to disagree on. I'm aware that they're subject to some criticism but there's also alot of former players/analysts who laud/celebrate the way they play. To each their own I suppose.

My main point with SGA is just that it seems like every few games there's a perfect storm play where he tries to bait, the defender plays good defense, but SGA still gets the call. And sometimes it seems like those plays overshadow the other 99.9% body of his work. He's been sooooo good this year.

Your counter to that is probably more like "yea, he's awesome and doesn't need to foul bait to be awesome". Fair enough. The new-age on-ball defender chess game can be annoying sometimes, but I also think the refs get it right much more often than it seems.

Anyways, I'm happy for you and your Spurs. I did not think the Thunder would have to grind this hard down the stretch to maintain the 1 seed. Spurs are coming and ahead of schedule. Hopefully we get the first of many Spurs-Thunder WCF this year. If the Spurs win, I'll gladly come back on here and say congrats.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Show me a time when SGA shot 43 free throws in a game. I'll wait! (JK)

I haven't watched the replays, but X is crazy on that. Definitely an absurd number.

Quote:

In all seriousness, my last post wasn't intended to be combative or passive aggressive. I'm genuinely sorry you took it that way.

Oh, I dont think that post was either, but you definitely had some passive-aggressive posts earlier when I called out SGA/Dort. It's all good. You're a good dude and this is all fun.

Quote:

The thing is, I don't disagree with a number of the points you made in your posts. I think we probably agree more than we disagree on Lu specifically. I agree that my pointing out that "others do it too" doesn't absolve him. It sometimes feels like he gets more attention for his bad behavior than others, but YOU have never made that argument. You've been plenty fair about calling out numerous guys around the league for their bad behavior.

I just want good basketball. I don't want Dort or Brooks or Green or anyone else to cheap shot and injure people. I'm good with hard fouls, but things like that aren't really hard fouls, they are cheap fouls. It's funny Dort admits he is wrong in doing it, too. You don't see guys like Dillon Brooks doing that.

I don't have a problem with hard fouls. People get mad at Caruso, Wallace, etc for playing physical and hacking but that doesn't bother me beyond the theory of "we can foul every time and we know they won't call them all." Just hacking hard/fouling hard is fine and part of the gamesmanship.
Quote:

Like I said in my previous post, I know he's very instrumental to the "culture" of the Thunder, but in many ways, I think him leaving will be an addition by subtraction.

This off-season is going to be crazy interesting to me. Dort, iHart, and a bunch of other guys may be on the chopping block because the luxury tax is going to be like $250M if they dont make major moves (plus salary pushing close to half a billion.) But those guys are needed and key parts of the machine. OKC has a ton of depth obviously plus multiple picks this year, so it will be interesting to see what the owners are willing to pay and how Presti gets there.

Quote:

There's probably some aspects of SGA and the "Thunder brand" of basketball specifically that we can agree to disagree on. I'm aware that they're subject to some criticism but there's also alot of former players/analysts who laud/celebrate the way they play. To each their own I suppose.

My main point with SGA is just that it seems like every few games there's a perfect storm play where he tries to bait, the defender plays good defense, but SGA still gets the call. And sometimes it seems like those plays overshadow the other 99.9% body of his work. He's been sooooo good this year.

Your counter to that is probably more like "yea, he's awesome and doesn't need to foul bait to be awesome". Fair enough.

That's exactly it. The two threes to ice Denver is a perfect example. You could argue the first was a push off just like Jordan in 98, but that's rarely called, especially with the game on the line, and especially when there is not full extension (there doesn't need to be full extension by the rules.) Just fantastic play by one of the most skilled players in the league. That's what people want to see.

Most of SGA is just incredible skill like that. But his flopping and baiting takes away from it and that is what people remember. Those antics are why he isn't liked outside OKC. If he cut that out of his game, he is still a MVP player and there wouldn't be any noticeable decline in performance. I don't get why he uses it as a crutch when he can run.


Quote:

Anyways, I'm happy for you and your Spurs. I did not think the Thunder would have to grind this hard down the stretch to maintain the 1 seed. Spurs are coming and ahead of schedule. Hopefully we get the first of many Spurs-Thunder WCF this year. If the Spurs win, I'll gladly come back on here and say congrats.


OKC still has to be the favorite and I might even put the Celtics as #2. Spurs are playing with house money at this point. They were predicted to be at 41 wins and 7% chance of playoffs by ESPN in the pre-season and they are on track for 61 wins. How they do in the playoffs will depend on the playoff seeding, I think Minnesota or OKC could knock the Spurs out, and Denver has Jokic and some depth, but I think their defense can be exploited. I think Spurs could be anywhere from a 2nd round exit to Cinderella run. But if I was a betting man, my money would be on OKC.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.