pdawg10384 said:
If you can afford Wilchester, that's the answer, not even a debate. It's a mini-Mayberry. Great families, best zoned schools in nearly all of Texas, active men's and women's clubs, no flooding. We analyzed every neighborhood up and down i10 several years, I'll save you all that time.
If you don't care about a social neighborhood, and have more priority on safety, and assuming you can afford it, the villages closer in are the other option (bunker hill, piney point, hunters creek)
You hit the nail on the head here.
I used to think that as you got more money you naturally try to "move up" to the "best" neighborhood you could afford.
But Wilchester vs the Villages is a perfect example of why that rule doesn't always work. An ITL example would be West U (or maybe the Heights) vs River Oaks.
The former examples in both cases have a very "Mayberry middle class" vibe with lots of parent involvement, community stuff, neighborhood pools etc.
The latter have a "big city rich enclave" vibe. Lots of elite private school attendance, country club memberships etc.
Even if you can afford the Villages or River Oaks you have to actually want to be in that neighborhood culture.