Outdoors
Sponsored by

Sig P320 Owners

13,260 Views | 97 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Bigballin
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SAPD suspending their use following the Air Force incident…

https://www.kens5.com/article/news/local/law-enforcement/sig-sauer-p320-safety-san-antonio-police-sapd-texas/273-698b04f6-61de-4944-868f-8d293773de1f
HoldMyBeer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houston police officer seeks $10 million from firearm manufacturer after unintentional discharge, injury
Officer Richard Fernandez is seeking $10 million from the manufacturer, Sig Sauer, which is actively defending itself in other lawsuits across the U.S. related to unintentional firearm discharges.

Houston police officer is suing Sig
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully none of the overconfident 320 owners above shot their balls off since 2018. That video is terrifying. Lots of great alternatives out there
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DannyDuberstein said:

Hopefully none of the overconfident 320 owners above shot their balls off since 2018. That video is terrifying. Lots of great alternatives out there


Which video? There are dozens of 320 uncommanded discharge videos.

The Lagrange officer's story is what got me.

Older cop on routine patrol by himself. 320 goes off and gets him in leg close to or on the femoral. Barely had the strength to call it in.
nealan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I apologize if this has already been covered, but is there an aftermarket FCU available to fix this issue? Don't know if I would want to trust Sig at this point
AgCMT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, that sucks. I've carried my 320 for a few years. I've changed out the trigger and grip and it has been my go-to. Finally got it dialed in the way I wanted it.

Hopefully Sig comes out with a fix or trade-in for this one.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only one posted on this thread. The stories are often dismissed as "surely they pulled the trigger somehow" - as evidenced by this thread. The video of how easily it happens doesn't lie.
AgCMT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DannyDuberstein said:

The only one posted on this thread. The stories are often dismissed as "surely they pulled the trigger somehow" - as evidenced by this thread. The video of how easily it happens doesn't lie.

There is little doubt that this is a major issue for Sig, but it does not easily happen. It is extremely rare for a modern pistol to misfire like that.

bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Sun said:

This video demonstrates a failure mode that I do not know if SIG can recover from. Uncommanded firing and failure of the striker safety,




That discharge just a few seconds into the video doesn't look real. Zero recoil?
jrb2019
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's only using a primed case.
EMY92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nealan said:

I apologize if this has already been covered, but is there an aftermarket FCU available to fix this issue? Don't know if I would want to trust Sig at this point

From a liability standpoint, I would prefer to stick with a Sig fix, if it's no good, they have deeper pockets to go after.

That said, even after fixed, I'm not sure I'd trust it until the fix has been in the wild for a long time.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgCMT said:

DannyDuberstein said:

The only one posted on this thread. The stories are often dismissed as "surely they pulled the trigger somehow" - as evidenced by this thread. The video of how easily it happens doesn't lie.

There is little doubt that this is a major issue for Sig, but it does not easily happen. It is extremely rare for a modern pistol to misfire like that.




Some model(s) less rare than others, apparently. At the end of the day, I carry to avoid being killed or injured. It's a risk mitigation exercise, and that's really all it is. I carry because of the rare chance I might need it. Not really looking to trade one rare risk for another when this model clearly has a higher risk level than others.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgCMT said:

DannyDuberstein said:

The only one posted on this thread. The stories are often dismissed as "surely they pulled the trigger somehow" - as evidenced by this thread. The video of how easily it happens doesn't lie.

There is little doubt that this is a major issue for Sig, but it does not easily happen. It is extremely rare for a modern pistol to misfire like that.



This is a case of not all 320s go off in holsters, but all guns going off in holsters uncommanded seem to be 320s.

I have delved deep into this over the last year or so from an engineers perspective, both build wise and manufacturers AND have the experience of carrying a sidearm as a duty weapon and truly understand what that term means.

The video I referenced seems to be the most likely case for now from what I can tell. The problem is that SIG pistols don't always align with other typical modern pistols and the 320 is no different. It utilizes a fully cocked striker under tension at all times. So when you pull the trigger, you are simply releasing the spring. It makes for a great trigger, but also finicky in way. They built in several safeties but they are failing in certain circumstances.

The big issue, per that video and from my own testing on my own 320, is how little margin of error is needed to hit those circumstances that could create an situation where an uncommanded discharge could occur. All he did was use a nail to take up the free play in the trigger to get to the point where the trigger meets the wall. He measured and it was approx. 1mm from rest. Which matches mine. At that point, the gun becomes compromised and outside vibrations can initiate the firing sequence and drop the striker AND defeat all the safeties. He demonstrated and repeated several times. I was able to drop the striker several times myself. Didn't bother testing with primed cases. I have my answer to my personal satisfaction.

Now, yes, this situation is rare comparatively speaking across every 320 every made. But this is where the duty gun comes into play. This platform is the official sidearm of the US military and tons of LE organizations in N. America. There are millions of these in the hands of people. Hundreds of thousands of them who have no choice. Then when you talking about the build quality of the 320s, there are simply not that great. Many internal parts are MIM, parts are sourced from all over the place, the slide slop is egregious, etc. Stacked tolerances are a thing and when you can create a situation when your sidearm gets the lightest hair trigger in the world, it becomes a problem when you have millions of possible chances every single day.

So you have the scenario of a hair trigger that can go off just by bumping the gun and then you have the environments that this gun is being asked to be placed into. Literal warzones and in street fights with thugs. Thousands of rounds through and in and out of holsters over and over. Over years and years. Tolerances loosen up. My first M9 was so bad I could fire with the safety on. You know what the armorer told me? Just don't carry condition one. That was the official fix they had for me. For a frontline grunt patrolling and living outside the wire every single day. And I HAD to carry it.

Point is, yes it is rare across the full spectrum of number made and issued. But that number is so huge the absolute number of UCs is still going to be high enough that it is unacceptable to military leaderships and civilians and why we are seeing SIG taking such flak. Mix that with the shadiness of how they won the initial contracts and how their PR have handled all the incidents to date prior to the Airman losing his life.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh duh. I was also thinking he was nuts so that makes me feel better about him. But… worse about myself.
aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw this on a local range gun store website....

Giant Banner at the top...

MPORTANT MESSAGE FROM SIG SAURER ABOUT THE P320'*** THE MOST EFFECTIVE SAFETY IS TO CARRY YOUR PISTOL WITHOUT A ROUND IN THE CHAMBER, AND TO LOAD A ROUND IN THE CHAMBER ONLY WHEN READY TO FIRE.***

Like that is any kind of solution...

Was interested in a 365, but after how they handled this having 2nd thoughts.

Never will be able to carry my P320 loaded for sure now.


It this an issue that affects all P320s or just before a certain year?

Mine is :

100-404-361
P320 SUB-CMPCT 9MM NIT 12+1 NS SEMI-AU

Purchased Dec 2018
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, no one really knows. The one issue I have been harping on here is only a possible cause so far but from what I can tell, the voluntary upgrade they rolled out a few years ago won't fix that issue. That was just to switch out the trigger bar to make it lighter to make it more drop safe. That was back when the 320s were catching hell for going off when being dropped. SIG was caught dead to rights on that one but somehow managed to evade a recall and instead issue a "voluntary upgrade program" to fix that issue IF you thought it was a problem. Putting the onus of liability on you ultimately I believe.

SIG has been pounding the table saying the gun is fine and literally blaming everyone but themselves and the guns design and its limitations and they have been able to do so because to date no one has been able to reliably replicate a factory defect in a lab setting to at would cause a UC. Which, given the possible cause in the video reference earlier, would be very hard to PROVE is the reason why this keeps happening, legally speaking IMO.

Given that billions of dollars, a significant numbers of careers, and the reputation of an entire storied gun manufacturer are on the line here. So they keep doubling down.

I am of the opinion now, that it simply isn't worth it. They are plennnnty of viable competitors out there. Hell, pretty much any handgun in that price range and even lower is going to be a hard competitor. It's a buyers market and a golden era of handguns right now. Factor in SIGs PR handling of this in the past and how they are treating the gun community at large, it's pretty disgusting to me. Ignore me, hate me, whatever. But don't treat me like I am stupid. This whole thread helped me center my thoughts on the matter. Pretty obvious where I stand on the SIG matter nowadays.

That's just me though. I have other platforms and don't need to upfront any costs to stay armed by shelving my SIGs. So I'm lucky there. Others may not be.

ETA: misread your post about the 365. Those are fine. Different design. Don't go off in holsters. Years of data now. Though they are rust buckets. Unbelievably so. I stopped carrying mine because of it.
The Sun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is interesting is that the failure mode WGP demonstrated in the video above fits the failure mode they had with the drops.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Sun said:

What is interesting is that the failure mode WGP demonstrated in the video above fits the failure mode they had with the drops.

It does, to an extent I believe. The same core issue is the same I think. That being the pistol is always on the verge of being "fired" to some degree and the firing stage creeping into that release point being very, very fine. The FBI identified a "shelf" I think is the term they used that the sear could end up resting on that would become the proverbial teetering on the cliff and when the drop issue happened at 29 degrees from a certain height, the trigger bar had enough mass that the inertia was enough to dislodge it and release the spring and again, bypass all the safeties and make the gun go off. That was what the VUP "fixed". They just put in a lightened trigger bar from what I gathered.

So same issue, different avenue getting there. WGP's theory is just highlighting how little tolerance is needed in the trigger to go from rest, to wall, to break in trigger releasing the striker. Around 1mm. And how while at that "wall" phase, even at the just the beginning of it, how easy it is to dislodge the sear and release the striker without pulling the trigger. Which again from one of the novels I wrote earlier, can be pretty much expected to happen sometime in the millions of them produced and in the environments they are being tasked to perform in.
Bigballin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It ends today" /Sig
The Sun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieMPH2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I never jumped on the 320 wagon but I know they are very popular and a lot of you guys have them.

What are you all thinking of replacing yours with and is this a good time to remind you all that P30's can be had for a very reasonable price these days?
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure what I will do. Mine is in a full size frame and is in my nightstand safe where it stays unless I take it to the range. I still love to shoot it, and I feel safe with it for intended purposes, but I don't like having a gun that I can't 100% trust if if I did ever want to hear it.

I also would not really want to sell it to anyone (even if they're aware of the safety issue) but I also don't like that it will be in my collection of guns that will someday be inherited by my kids.

Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiez03 said:

Saw this on a local range gun store website....

Giant Banner at the top...

MPORTANT MESSAGE FROM SIG SAURER ABOUT THE P320'*** THE MOST EFFECTIVE SAFETY IS TO CARRY YOUR PISTOL WITHOUT A ROUND IN THE CHAMBER, AND TO LOAD A ROUND IN THE CHAMBER ONLY WHEN READY TO FIRE.***

Like that is any kind of solution...

Was interested in a 365, but after how they handled this having 2nd thoughts.

Never will be able to carry my P320 loaded for sure now.


It this an issue that affects all P320s or just before a certain year?

Mine is :

100-404-361
P320 SUB-CMPCT 9MM NIT 12+1 NS SEMI-AU

Purchased Dec 2018

I will say I've had a P365 and currently carry a P365 X Macro with a little bit of aftermarket. Both have been great and there's never been an issue I've heard of with any of the P365 line. But yeah, Sig has not handled the situation with the P320 correctly at all.
PMD03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieMPH2005 said:

What are you all thinking of replacing yours with and is this a good time to remind you all that P30's can be had for a very reasonable price these days?

Beretta M9.

On a serious note, I picked up some .gov Sig p226s and p229s when they were trading them in for p320s. Oh the irony.
Muzzleblast
How long do you want to ignore this user?

But wait! There's more!
I own 5 variations of the 320. Never had an issue with them.
Here's something I saw this morning on X. Could be swapping parts from various age pistols causing this issue. Makes sense for military and police pistols.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To me it looks like the design requires certain sufficiently tight tolerances but not all possible manufacture runs and variations of part assemblies or options can maintain those tolerances and retain proper safety function.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IDPA has now officially banned the 320 from its competitions until further notice.

Screenshot taken by me from their main site. Pretty big org joining the list of "No 320s" here. P320s were definitely not uncommon at those matches and they are big enough and this took long enough that I am sure this wasn't just knee jerk reactionary but a difficult and long thought decision.

SIGs reputation really can't tank any worse I don't think at this point.


Muzzleblast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes. More reading this morning said the Sig does "rolling updates" to their manufacturing process. That would mean variable tolerances between pistols of different eras. Not sure how they could address this.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All materials 'stretch' over time (well, not ceramics etc), not just the 'plastic fantastic' bits. Wouldn't the main issue be bits in the fire control group and/or upper that are metal getting outside of the 'half millimeter' tolerances discussed on various videos here?

Just curious what a theoretical 'fix' could entail/be comprised of.
Muzzleblast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No idea. Seems more info pops up daily on this. I'll just keep reading.
malenurse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Am I the only one who likes the P320. I like mine and am able to shoot it proficiently.

Although it hasn't tried to kill me......




yet
The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But, it's still on the list.
RealMcCoy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have one that I rarely take out of the safe, and I did send it into Sig back in 2017 for the voluntary upgrade they offered. I have not had an issue with it, but I do not carry it every day, and I rarely take it out to the ranch to shoot, it just kinda lives in my safe. Maybe it would be worth just getting rid of it all together.
Muzzleblast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope. See my post. Own 5 variants. EDC is a Wilson WC320.
Never had any problems out of them.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not sure I could sell mine in good conscience. Not saying it's wrong to do so but it would eat at me. Even if the buyer knows all about the issues.

Im still hopeful that Sig addresses this in a satisfactory way.
nealan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can you still send guns in for the upgrade ??
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.