I have some basic tenets I go by and they have served me well. One of them is to pay no heed to anything coming from someone named Hakeem.

nortex97 said:

---

njohn87 said:

---

No, I don't think he's promoting civil war

---

He said explicitly he wants to beat them electorally, and then crush their spirit. It's a clear battle cry for civil strife, imho.

---

I thought "snowflake" was an insult. Didn't expect anyone to actually embrace it.

Kozmozag said:

---

He always looks like he is stoned. Maybe its just low iq.

---

He looks gay. And there's nothing wrong with that, but he seems to have problems admitting it. I think that's where some of his anger and bizarreness comes from. The dude is weird as ***** And a dumbass.

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Settle down Hakeem. Thune's doing a good enough job on his own.

---

Thune sucks too.

Just a total wanker. I will never understand how he got in that position, meaning, how did anyone think he was the best choice.

annie88 said:

---

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Settle down Hakeem. Thune's doing a good enough job on his own.

---

Thune sucks too.

Just a total wanker. I will never understand how he got in that position, meaning, how did anyone think he was the best choice.

---

Because the senate just cares about enriching themselves, not America.

FTAG 2000 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Settle down Hakeem. Thune's doing a good enough job on his own.

---

Thune sucks too.

Just a total wanker. I will never understand how he got in that position, meaning, how did anyone think he was the best choice.

---

Because the senate just cares about enriching themselves, not America.

---

I guess but I mean he was just a horrible choice out of horrible choices. What we really need is term limits. No one in Congress should ever serve more than six years. Ever.

FTAG 2000 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Settle down Hakeem. Thune's doing a good enough job on his own.

---

Thune sucks too.

Just a total wanker. I will never understand how he got in that position, meaning, how did anyone think he was the best choice.

---

Because the senate just cares about enriching themselves, not America.

---

And staying in power or in the Senate or both.

AgDev01 said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

The intent is quite explicitly to suppress and then crush political dissent via the power of the federal government, including all 3 branches.

---

Talk about accusing others of what you are doing.

---

Multiple assassination attempts by the left. Actual assassination of Charlie Kirk by the left. Actual riots and violence to "prove their point" by the left (BLM, ANTIFA, etc….). Just recently beating the occupant of a Trump house in San Diego by the left.

The left talking about adding states to add liberal senators…. Packing the court. Multiple other "political ploys" to take away power.

The Russia hoax. HRC, obama, biden and other dems in on it. Turning the DOJ into a weapon against Trump and conservatives. Flat out lying about the Hunter Biden laptop by not only Joe, but the Secret Service, CIA, and the FBI…. Literally suppressing the free speech of Trump and other Conservatives….

And on and on and on…..

Anyone with half a brain knows who the true fascists are…. YOU and the rest of the left have made it abundantly clear.

annie88 said:

---

FTAG 2000 said:

---

annie88 said:

---

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Settle down Hakeem. Thune's doing a good enough job on his own.

---

Thune sucks too.

Just a total wanker. I will never understand how he got in that position, meaning, how did anyone think he was the best choice.

---

Because the senate just cares about enriching themselves, not America.

---

I guess but I mean he was just a horrible choice out of horrible choices. What we really need is term limits. No one in Congress should ever serve more than six years. Ever.

---

Thune is McCain all over again. A butthurt *****.

nortex97 said:

---

njohn87 said:

---

No, I don't think he's promoting civil war

---

He said explicitly he wants to beat them electorally, and then crush their spirit. It's a clear battle cry for civil strife, imho.

He, nor any prominent democrat, ever get specific about what they decry as 'unAmerican' or whatever their gripes with MAGA are, just vague references to 'fascism' or racism. The intent is quite explicitly to suppress and then crush political dissent via the power of the federal government, including all 3 branches. This is a move toward civil war, pure and simple, in other words.

---

He's talking about crushing their spirit in an election. Let's not be like the dems and try to turn everything into an extreme commentary.

pdc093 said:

---

and crush their spirit"....

Is he actually PROMOTING 'civil war'?

Democrat House Leader Hakeem Jeffries says he wants to "break the spirit" of voters who support President Trump. pic.twitter.com/vylfRbQZkg

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 19, 2026

---

The only thing I hear out of his mouth is more DemocRatic party crap.

Again, the Republican party is still made up of spineless jellyfish for they never call on him out to explain how he is going to "destroy" MAGA.

That's a lot of fascist and anti-freedom noise from a guy who, by the looks of it, could only break wind, if anything.

SquirrellyDan said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

njohn87 said:

---

No, I don't think he's promoting civil war

---

He said explicitly he wants to beat them electorally, and then crush their spirit. It's a clear battle cry for civil strife, imho.

He, nor any prominent democrat, ever get specific about what they decry as 'unAmerican' or whatever their gripes with MAGA are, just vague references to 'fascism' or racism. The intent is quite explicitly to suppress and then crush political dissent via the power of the federal government, including all 3 branches. This is a move toward civil war, pure and simple, in other words.

---

He's talking about crushing their spirit in an election. Let's not be like the dems and try to turn everything into an extreme commentary.

---

I respectfully disagree. He is promoting crushing their spirit after an election, with the power of the government. The whole 'open society' objectives as shown in Eisman's 'rule of law' doctrines is to strengthen the institutions of government to then not be subject to a populist 'backsliding' such that government autocrats are threatened by the people. This is widely shown in works by himself, Jankowicz, and various European tools that have been used to suppress/cancel threatening parties/elections in Europe etc. But most effectively by what they did to the non Ray Epps/26 FBI confidential human sources etc. in J6.

On January 6th I followed the crowd into the Capitol and shouted. Police stood by the whole time, hanging out with us and sometimes directing us places.

At one point near the House Chambers I was walking downstairs when a trio of some special section, secret service looking men… pic.twitter.com/MfXedvxQl5

— Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men (@Pat_Stedman) May 22, 2026

Those show trials/gulags and use of over 1/3 of the FBI to find 'them all' weren't just to punish crimes, but send a message to possible Trump supporters (and of course himself) not to try to run for office/take charge of DC again. And they only regret that it didn't go far enough/didn't stop 'maga' from returning. Remember when Peepaw wouldn't send US marshals to protect even scotus justices homes when KBJ/Sotomayor were drawing out the abortion ruling? Stephen Miller has to live on a military base today with his wife and kids. Russiagate, Mueller, Jack Smith weren't just after Trump; they were after us, and they want to go further, next time. The violent rhetoric from the left is only increasing in tenor and tone, because it has a growing audience.

nortex97 said:

---

SquirrellyDan said:

---

nortex97 said:

---

njohn87 said:

---

No, I don't think he's promoting civil war

---

He said explicitly he wants to beat them electorally, and then crush their spirit. It's a clear battle cry for civil strife, imho.

He, nor any prominent democrat, ever get specific about what they decry as 'unAmerican' or whatever their gripes with MAGA are, just vague references to 'fascism' or racism. The intent is quite explicitly to suppress and then crush political dissent via the power of the federal government, including all 3 branches. This is a move toward civil war, pure and simple, in other words.

---

He's talking about crushing their spirit in an election. Let's not be like the dems and try to turn everything into an extreme commentary.

---

I respectfully disagree. He is promoting crushing their spirit after an election, with the power of the government. The whole 'open society' objectives as shown in Eisman's 'rule of law' doctrines is to strengthen the institutions of government to then not be subject to a populist 'backsliding' such that government autocrats are threatened by the people. This is widely shown in works by himself, Jankowicz, and various European tools that have been used to suppress/cancel threatening parties/elections in Europe etc. But most effectively by what they did to the non Ray Epps/26 FBI confidential human sources etc. in J6.

On January 6th I followed the crowd into the Capitol and shouted. Police stood by the whole time, hanging out with us and sometimes directing us places.

At one point near the House Chambers I was walking downstairs when a trio of some special section, secret service looking men… pic.twitter.com/MfXedvxQl5

— Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men (@Pat_Stedman) May 22, 2026

Those show trials/gulags and use of over 1/3 of the FBI to find 'them all' weren't just to punish crimes, but send a message to possible Trump supporters (and of course himself) not to try to run for office/take charge of DC again. And they only regret that it didn't go far enough/didn't stop 'maga' from returning. Remember when Peepaw wouldn't send US marshals to protect even scotus justices homes when KBJ/Sotomayor were drawing out the abortion ruling? Stephen Miller has to live on a military base today with his wife and kids. Russiagate, Mueller, Jack Smith weren't just after Trump; they were after us, and they want to go further, next time. The violent rhetoric from the left is only increasing in tenor and tone, because it has a growing audience.

---

THIS!

And are we going to passively stand back when they do this again?

Are we going to comply when they seek to force another shutdown"to stop the spread'

Which was a total lie and created arguably the greatest transfer/theft of wealth in human history?

They (the dems) are a worthless breed of grifters who will do and say anything to attain power. The dem plantation is a perfect utopia of socialism with a ruling classy to drum up the excitement which the working class falls in line like little puppets.

From the party of "norms" and civility in public discourse

njohn87 said:

---

It sounds like something a coach would tell his team about the opponent in the locker room; I'm not seeing anything more insidious than "we need to win" in the statement.

---

The demoCommiecRat thought process is mind boggling at times!

Laughable!