Hill08 said:
Is there anything that is more of a waste of time than these? ALL it is are members making a 10 minute political statement then asking a rhetorical question at the end.
Owlagdad said:
lets see what jack Smith says.
Hill08 said:
Is there anything that is more of a waste of time than these? ALL it is are members making a 10 minute political statement then asking a rhetorical question at the end.
Hill08 said:
Is there anything that is more of a waste of time than these? ALL it is are members making a 10 minute political statement then asking a rhetorical question at the end.
MouthBQ98 said:
The public ones exist purely to generate media sound bites and material that can be used to manufacture propaganda. That seems to be almost the only purpose now.
This is a pretty masterful 5 minutes from Rep. Jim Jordan.
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) January 22, 2026
He uses disgraced and discredited testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson to demonstrate how the truth simply didn’t matter to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee.
They wanted to GET TRUMP at all costs. pic.twitter.com/5IBjqxKZAE
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:This is a pretty masterful 5 minutes from Rep. Jim Jordan.
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) January 22, 2026
He uses disgraced and discredited testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson to demonstrate how the truth simply didn’t matter to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee.
They wanted to GET TRUMP at all costs. pic.twitter.com/5IBjqxKZAE
aggiehawg said:
This is like an ethics lecture and Jack Smith is repeatedly shown not have any.
sleepybeagle said:Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:This is a pretty masterful 5 minutes from Rep. Jim Jordan.
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) January 22, 2026
He uses disgraced and discredited testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson to demonstrate how the truth simply didn’t matter to Jack Smith and the J6 Committee.
They wanted to GET TRUMP at all costs. pic.twitter.com/5IBjqxKZAE
Yea - that pretty much sums it all up and the lack of ethics on the left.
🚨 JUST IN: CHAOS erupts during Jack Smith's hearing as former J6 Capitol Police officer Michael Fanone goes off on Ivan Ranklin and an altercation breaks out
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 22, 2026
Things are getting TENSE. Fanone ended up leaving.
"This guy has threatened my family!" pic.twitter.com/igXBWz64sW
POLITICAL VIOLENCE: Disgraced J6 cop Michael Fanone tried to start a fight during a House Judiciary hearing on Jack Smith’s Trump probe. Democrats are resorting to violence in churches and in the Capitol.
— @amuse (@amuse) January 22, 2026
h/t @_johnnymaga pic.twitter.com/g9Ay8aIL76
Who thinks I should sue Mr. Fanone for defamation? pic.twitter.com/ZyoctE0fR1
— Ivan Raiklin (@IvanRaiklin) January 22, 2026
No wonder that guy has convinced himself he is some sort of hero. He's a delusional liar. Was he even at the Capitol on J6? He's clearly being paid by nefarious parties.Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:Who thinks I should sue Mr. Fanone for defamation? pic.twitter.com/ZyoctE0fR1
— Ivan Raiklin (@IvanRaiklin) January 22, 2026
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. CHAOS erupts after Rep. Issa confirms Jack Smith WITHHELD INFO from a judge when he spied on Republicans
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 22, 2026
"We have an ADMISSION! How many times are you gonna interrupt me?!"
"An Article 1 rep. WITHHELD INFORMATION! I yield in DISGUST of this witness!" pic.twitter.com/3QXFj37ENU
.@RepBrandonGill is so good at this.
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 22, 2026
Congressional hearings with him are masterclasses in questioning
Short, easy to understand, and cutting pic.twitter.com/6GecDVYW8K
These fantastic-four Pelosi fedsurrectionist perjurors must be dealt with along with Jack Smith:
— Ivan Raiklin (@IvanRaiklin) January 22, 2026
Mikey Fanone, Aquinilo Gonnell, Danny Hodges, Harry Dunn. pic.twitter.com/p7xEzlYu9F
Holy Shit was there a fake swearing in of Jack Smith? pic.twitter.com/J1qqHrlX7W
— Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) January 22, 2026
🔥🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) totally RIPS Jack Smith during House Judiciary Committee.
— The Patriot Oasis™ (@ThePatriotOasis) January 22, 2026
ROY: "Let me ask you this. Am I on this list? Did you target my records and subpoena my phone toll records?"
SMITH: "My understanding is your records were subpoenaed by prosecutors… pic.twitter.com/Uhl5Q6lvl2
Jack Smith can't answer where $35 million of taxpayer dollars went during his sham investigation.
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 22, 2026
JIM JORDAN: "Who's the source?"
SMITH: "I do not know the source..."
JORDAN: "You're giving money to people the country doesn't know who they are..." pic.twitter.com/qCzhDik45a
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 22, 2026
"You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥
HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?!
SMITH: ...uh...
HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE… pic.twitter.com/45N0EVsEI6
.@reprussellfry breaks down just how farcical Smith's timeline for the J6 case was -- requesting a trial 5 months after the indictment, forcing Trump's team to process 13 MILLION documents, essentially at a rate of 70 pages per minute. Smith offers no explanation.
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) January 22, 2026
FRY: Do you… pic.twitter.com/LD1bb3KaPS
Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony.
— Overton (@overton_news) January 22, 2026
CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer.
HONIG: “To your question, Brianna,… pic.twitter.com/JgLUKrU4nK
J6 disgrace Michael Fanone caughs and yells, “Go f*** yourself!” at Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) during the J6 committee hearing.
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) January 22, 2026
This is really who Democrats call their hero of J6? Someone who can’t even behave like an adult at a congressional hearing.
Sad!pic.twitter.com/PZVv4RL3FH
🔥🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ) dismantles Jack Smith MASTERFULLY @Congressman_JVD: "Those congressional records that were subpoenaed, the congressional records looked at, was one of them a Democrat?"
— The Patriot Oasis™ (@ThePatriotOasis) January 22, 2026
SMITH: *STUMBLES*
VAN DREW: "No. The answer is no. I will answer… pic.twitter.com/gtEtxMKQkW
Rep. Tom Tiffany grills Jack Smith on using the IRS to target Second Amendment groups.
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 22, 2026
TIFFANY: "Did you attempt to work with...the IRS to investigate non-profits?"
SMITH: "I asked for a meeting with the IRS about non-profits."
TIFFANY: "So the simple answer is yes." pic.twitter.com/3soO4tNmaK
WATCH: Brutal first round of question for former Special Counsel Jack Smith by Californai Republican @KevinKileyCA pic.twitter.com/zdM4BhZBpu
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 22, 2026
aggiehawg said:
Love Hageman. She's a very sharp cookie and very articulate.
The January 6 committee destroyed documents pic.twitter.com/bNQCnghP5t
— Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 (@KarluskaP) January 22, 2026