Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

---

No I'm not. I am saying islam should be outlawed in the US. You apparently disagree

---

I'm saying the First Amendment, like it or not, protects it. You don't agree with the First Amendment?


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Islam is not mentioned as an exception. It was written that way for a reason.

---

Hence my earlier comment which you either did not understand or just disregarded. The Founders did not write in "freedom of religion" for islam. They were English protestants who warred with muslims and hated their King. They literally owned slaves. So yea no, the Founders were not allowing islam in the US

---

Probably didn't want those Jews in her either….or Buddhists….or Hindus……. Hell, while you're at it, let's not the F16 home run and boot those pesky Catholics while we're at it.

i have ZERO love for Islam, but that's a slippery slope you're on that goes against everything our forefathers stood for.

---

I am sorry it makes you uncomfortable. The Founders literally said only free white landowners can vote. It's a messy situation if you are sensitive but also trying to quote the Constitution at me

---

It does seem a waste of time….

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

---

Violence? What is this? Islam should be banned. If you disagree, that's your prerogative.

---

The only way to ban a religion in any country is to use violence to eradicate and then keep it out.

Read the comments below the tweet. There is some major propaganda going on right now.

Some people claiming the Jews and America's run isis, Kash is a deep state goone, it's all made up, etc. It's crazy

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

---

Violence? What is this? Islam should be banned. If you disagree, that's your prerogative.

---

The only way to ban a religion in any country is to use violence to eradicate and then keep it out.

---

That's correct. The government can use violence to enforce laws.

Rapier108 said:

---

Ah, more personal attacks.

We have at least 10 that post on F16, and probably a few more on TA.

And yes, Islamists and totalitarian "christian" theocracts are simply opposite sides of the same evil coin. The world would be better off without any of them.

---

Who are these totalitarian "christian" theocracts? Sounds like a serious problem. Can you name a few?

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

---

Violence? What is this? Islam should be banned. If you disagree, that's your prerogative.

---

The only way to ban a religion in any country is to use violence to eradicate and then keep it out.

---

That's correct. The government can use violence to enforce laws.

---

Usually we dislike it when the government is used to violent someone's rights. Maybe you are just the same as the Muslims.

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

---

Violence? What is this? Islam should be banned. If you disagree, that's your prerogative.

---

The only way to ban a religion in any country is to use violence to eradicate and then keep it out.

---

That's correct. The government can use violence to enforce laws.

---

Usually we dislike it when the government is used to violent someone's rights. Maybe you are just the same as the Muslims.

---

Yeah. I'm literally saying we should ban Islam in the US. But I'm "the same as Muslims". This is why I say "conservatism" is defunct.

Rapier108 said:

---

Ah, more personal attacks.

We have at least 10 that post on F16, and probably a few more on TA.

And yes, Islamists and totalitarian "christian" theocracts are simply opposite sides of the same evil coin. The world would be better off without any of them.

---

I've never attacked you until this moronic post. Pay attention to posting history. This coming from you is a shock. Dont go Tucker on us.

So do tell who are these "Christian Theocrats you are so afraid of. You do know there is a BIG difference between Christianity and Islam, right ?

ttu_85 said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Ah, more personal attacks.

We have at least 10 that post on F16, and probably a few more on TA.

And yes, Islamists and totalitarian "christian" theocracts are simply opposite sides of the same evil coin. The world would be better off without any of them.

---

I've never attacked you until this moronic post. Pay attention to posting history. This coming from you is a shock. Dont go Tucker on us.

So do tell who are these "Christian Theocrats you are so afraid of. You do know there is a BIG difference between Christianity and Islam, right ?

---

More like Catholic theocrat. I know one changes his handle often. Can't remember the more recent names, but was one, he was from S. Africa IIRC, that posted a lot and still does, from time to time.

BigRobSA said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Ah, more personal attacks.

We have at least 10 that post on F16, and probably a few more on TA.

And yes, Islamists and totalitarian "christian" theocracts are simply opposite sides of the same evil coin. The world would be better off without any of them.

---

I've never attacked you until this moronic post. Pay attention to posting history. This coming from you is a shock. Dont go Tucker on us.

So do tell who are these "Christian Theocrats you are so afraid of. You do know there is a BIG difference between Christianity and Islam, right ?

---

More like Catholic theocrat. I know one changes his handle often. Can't remember the more recent names, but was one, he was from S. Africa IIRC, that posted a lot and still does, from time to time.

---

Oh yeah I remember that bunch. There were about 8 to 10 of them. I wouldn't call them Christian Theocrats- I'd just call 'em nuts.

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

---

Violence? What is this? Islam should be banned. If you disagree, that's your prerogative.

---

The only way to ban a religion in any country is to use violence to eradicate and then keep it out.

---

That's correct. The government can use violence to enforce laws.

---

Usually we dislike it when the government is used to violent someone's rights. Maybe you are just the same as the Muslims.

---

Yeah. I'm literally saying we should ban Islam in the US. But I'm "the same as Muslims". This is why I say "conservatism" is defunct.

---

Plenty of countries out there have no religious freedom, sounds like you might be happier living in one of those. Thankfully it's not how the US works.

Yes, Tucker great idea to give the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world a nuke.

Unbelievable. Now @TuckerCarlson is arguing it would be “a GOOD thing” if the Ayatollah had a nuclear weapon. READ it yourself.

Apparently “Death to America” is an ambiguous sentiment to Mr. Qatarlson.#TuckerIsAmericaLast https://t.co/hBIoJgxGkc

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) January 20, 2026

TRM said:

---

Yes, Tucker great idea to give the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world a nuke.

Unbelievable. Now @TuckerCarlson is arguing it would be “a GOOD thing” if the Ayatollah had a nuclear weapon. READ it yourself.

Apparently “Death to America” is an ambiguous sentiment to Mr. Qatarlson.#TuckerIsAmericaLast https://t.co/hBIoJgxGkc

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) January 20, 2026

---

I see your point and I also see Tucker's point as far as "stabilization" goes. I prefer a DEnuclearized middle east. Yes, all countries.

Keyno said:

---

I see your point and I also see Tucker's point as far as "stabilization" goes. I prefer a DEnuclearized middle east. Yes, all countries.

---

Whatever gets rid of Israel the fastest, right?

Phatbob said:

---

Keyno said:

---

I see your point and I also see Tucker's point as far as "stabilization" goes. I prefer a DEnuclearized middle east. Yes, all countries.

---

Whatever gets rid of Israel the fastest, right?

---

The United States official policy is non proliferation. Israel is non signer of the NPT for some reason. Ideally, only the US has nukes.

You know what would make the Iran revolution even better, if their radical Muslim leadership had nukes.

It worked out great for the people of North Korea.

Hmmm...........how to summarize my thoughts after perusing this thread multiple times.


Never allowing Iran to have nukes is always the right answer, whether the US, Israel, or both have to ensure it never happens.

I wish the Iranian people well in their revolution and fully support it as long as US boots never touch their soil (unless they win and want to normalize pre-1980 relations).

Tucker is officially a wingnut. Yikes.

There is no chance of a Christian theological takeover in this country. That's silly.

Islamophobia is a rational, reasonable, outcome of simply observing what so many muslims do globally as well as specifically in the western nations. Completely incompatible with western culture.

We can't ban a religion in America. We can however stop importing more muslims. And should.

I find it cute that "muslim" is tagged for incorrect spelling unless I capitalize it. Sorry, don't fell like capitalizing it.

Shalom. Have a blessed day. Etc.

This whole thread is nuts. Tucker is flat out compromised or has brain worms. Aggies actually wasting mental bandwidth on trying to project the virtues of an American theocracy. It won't happen without a civil war so it's pointless to even consider.

This is the type of thread outsiders point at for the insanity of F16 and all you can do is nod slowly.

Wonder what Tucker will say...

Hillary, John Kerry, Piers Morgan, & Tucker Carlson will be speaking at a Saudi confab in Riyadh this week. Tucker will be appearing for his 2nd time.

They will be compensated by the Saudi government's investing agency. Singing the praises of the govt in exchange for for cash. pic.twitter.com/Q4C48Yd9aD

— Jordan Schachtel (@JordanSchachtel) January 26, 2026

Simping again for his Middle East masters.

Tucker Carlson just said "America had no Islamic terrorism problem before 1948."

The U.S. Navy was created in 1798 because Islamic terrorists off the coast of Libya kept kidnapping American sailors and merchants, calling them "infidels."

Treat Qatarlson like the idiot he is. pic.twitter.com/n7vGsWrHEN

— Shabbos Kestenbaum (@ShabbosK) January 26, 2026

UTExan said:

---

Sinking deeper into the quagmire it appears to me. Who is he listening to?

Tucker Carlson said fears of radical Islam are a psychological operation he claims is being promoted by the Israeli government to influence the American public.

“It comes from the Israeli government”

He said he is unaware of a single person in the United States who has been… pic.twitter.com/T20GcCH6m3

— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) December 27, 2025

---

He obviously did not serve with us in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He makes good points about other bigger societal problems. Are their tragic incidents, yes. But its kinda like how woke gender ideology in the classroom is a bigger problem than school shootings.

Radical Islam just reintroduced legalized slavery in Afghanistan. Tell us, again, Tucker, how the fear of radical Islam is overblown.

🚨New: Tucker Carlson speaking in Saudi Arabia says he is confirmable with Islam:

“I'm, for whatever it's worth, a pretty fervent Christian and I feel completely comfortable here in the seat of Islam and just saying that is a threat somehow to some people.”

In Saudi Arabia,… pic.twitter.com/AqieO8zs3W

— The Calvin Coolidge Project (@TheCalvinCooli1) January 28, 2026

I wonder if his dumb ass is comfortable knowing that if he was a citizen there, he could be arrested for admitting that he's a Christian?

No Spin Ag said:

---

He's not wrong about all the things causing infinitely more harm to Americans than Radical Islamist.


I just don't get where Israel comes into this.

Is the Israel thing a Groyper thing?

---

He's Judeophobic

Probably not. He should ask where can he go to church.

Propaganda pushing pos

The guy’s entire newsletter now is just devoted to shilling to the Islamic Republic and obsessing over Israel

— AG (@AGHamilton29) January 29, 2026