Is she the obese younger model of this?

ttha_aggie_09 said:

---

Correct

---

This is your typical liberal/Democrat. Uneducated, indoctrinated minions that act like lemmings.

Where is that cliff when you need it.

flown-the-coop said:

---

annie88 said:

---

---

Funny how Homer even has the physical representations of TDS these days. Such a shame.

---

Yet there it is the most false. There are few quite as much as Homer would expect the last to care about such things. Its not eating, working, etc. Its part of his charm.

From now on I’m calling these protests National Arts and Crafts for Elderly Retarded Persons Day https://t.co/fIwX5eLsxB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) October 18, 2025

Texas is looking bad.

redcrayon said:

---

Texas is looking bad.

---

Huh? Liberals/Dems live in Texas. They'll always live in Texas.

redcrayon said:

---

Texas is looking bad.

---

In what way do you mean? That these demonstrations are there at all? Doesn't the paltry size and their age re-assure any?

redcrayon said:

---

Texas is looking bad.

---

A dozen or fewer idiots on the road side means nothing.

I hate the left. The biggest bunch of clowns ever. I've never hated anyone in my life but that entire group can rot in hell.

These are 100% paid for protests. None of this is organic. The biggest change in recent memory is nobody is falling for it anymore. We no longer believe whatever cause they're protesting for. It's no longer an effective tool. The vast majority just see them as petulant children and dismiss them like you do a toddler throwing a fit at the store. That's a massive change, by the way.

Bunch of crying titty baby whiners.

I don't even understand what their whole "protest", here, is even about.

What kingly/royal thing has Trump done, or attempted to do?


He keeps getting dick-slapped by leftist judges, who haven't been executed, not exactly the sign of a "King" being in power.

He was shot, as was Charlie Kirk, who was actually killed by said shot, and not the other way around.

Seems like he's a ****ty example of a "King". The left is chock full of ruhtards.

BigRobSA said:

---

I don't even understand what their whole "protest", here, is even about.

What kingly/royal thing has Trump done, or attempted to do?

---

He got elected

BQ_90 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

I don't even understand what their whole "protest", here, is even about.

What kingly/royal thing has Trump done, or attempted to do?

---

He got elected

---

With the center left's help no less. A true national election, even popular vote.

And the Left dares imply there is anything illegitimate about him compared to their candidate who couldn't even win a Democratic primary let alone a General.

Sadly, George Soros will not pay for his crimes in this life. He's 95 and probably will be dead soon. But I hope they go after the son, Alex. And I hope he goes to prison.

BQ_90 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

I don't even understand what their whole "protest", here, is even about.

What kingly/royal thing has Trump done, or attempted to do?

---

He got elected

---

Yep. That's it.

ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!

Secolobo said:

---

From now on I’m calling these protests National Arts and Crafts for Elderly Retarded Persons Day https://t.co/fIwX5eLsxB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) October 18, 2025

---

Wow. That must be every Democrat in Washington County.

Those Know Kinks "protestors" look baked.

From Trump Social:

Their protest failed. Jesus is still King.

agsquirrel97 said:

---

Hey honey, if you can continue to scream, "I can't breathe, I can't breathe!"

you can in fact breathe.

hope that helps

---

Yup. Major attention hoar.

***** is a bad word?

But bear spray to the face should keep the allergies at bay for a bit, maybe permanently.

The "No Kings" protests aren't about monarchy literally returning, they're symbolic. The concern is about presidential overreach and defending democratic norms. Even if we technically have no king, some people worry that certain political figures act as though they're above accountability. You don't have to agree, but that's the idea behind it, not that we're suddenly crowning royalty.

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

The "No Kings" protests aren't about monarchy literally returning, they're symbolic. The concern is about presidential overreach and defending democratic norms. Even if we technically have no king, some people worry that certain political figures act as though they're above accountability. You don't have to agree, but that's the idea behind it, not that we're suddenly crowning royalty.

---

You think these people think that ? They just hate Trump. That's it period.

agsquirrel97 said:

---

pdc093 said:

---

F.A.F.O......they're THERE.

PORTLAND: Anti-ICE “protestors” and Antifa militants pretend like they’re big and tough until they get BEAR SPRAYED by federal agents. pic.twitter.com/ZWT90h5SLK

— D. Scott @eclipsethis2003 (@eclipsethis2003) October 18, 2025

---

Hey honey, if you can continue to scream, "I can't breathe, I can't breathe!"

you can in fact breathe.

hope that helps

---

Derrick Chauvin would like a word....

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

The "No Kings" protests aren't about monarchy literally returning, they're symbolic. The concern is about presidential overreach and defending democratic norms. Even if we technically have no king, some people worry that certain political figures act as though they're above accountability. You don't have to agree, but that's the idea behind it, not that we're suddenly crowning royalty.

---

You mean like having auto pen running the white house or ignoring primaries and installing whoever you want to,run for POTUS

Or is more like celebrating the assignation of somebody you don't agree with. Or maybe trying assassinate the opposing nominee for POTUS

Or is it funneling tax paying money to so called NGOs to usurp immigration laws or spread propaganda against your opponents?

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

The "No Kings" protests aren't about monarchy literally returning, they're symbolic. The concern is about presidential overreach and defending democratic norms. Even if we technically have no king, some people worry that certain political figures act as though they're above accountability. You don't have to agree, but that's the idea behind it, not that we're suddenly crowning royalty.

---

Yeah that's not at all what it's about. It's 100% about a political system that's completely out of control because it's completely unaccountable to the people. Trump is the first person that's posed a threat to their control in the past 50 years and these artificial protests are the government trying to convince you and me that we shouldn't support him. Government is the problem and these protests and the government trying to regain control over the narrative.

That's a lot of claims most of which aren't supported by evidence. If we're going to talk about democracy and overreach, it helps to stick to verifiable facts. The "No Kings" message is about limiting concentrated power not about partisan conspiracies or violence. If you want to discuss that issue seriously, I'm all for it. But throwing around unproven accusations doesn't get us anywhere.

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

That's a lot of claims most of which aren't supported by evidence. If we're going to talk about democracy and overreach, it helps to stick to verifiable facts. The "No Kings" message is about limiting concentrated power not about partisan conspiracies or violence. If you want to discuss that issue seriously, I'm all for it. But throwing around unproven accusations doesn't get us anywhere.

---

Curious, which claims aren't facts?

If you've got credible sources, share them. Otherwise, it sounds like a mix of internet talking points rather than a real argument about democracy.

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

That's a lot of claims most of which aren't supported by evidence. If we're going to talk about democracy and overreach, it helps to stick to verifiable facts. The "No Kings" message is about limiting concentrated power not about partisan conspiracies or violence. If you want to discuss that issue seriously, I'm all for it. But throwing around unproven accusations doesn't get us anywhere.

---

Which of those isn't true? Harris has yet to receive a primary vote, she was unquestionably installed as the candidate last year. We saw countless liberals celebrate Kirk's death. We know for a fact the autopen signed pardons. We don't know if that's constitutional, that remains to be seen.

We also know the FBI lied to influence the 2016 and 2020 elections. And we know the CIA led the way towards creating the infamous "Russian disinformation" letter about Hunter's laptop. We know there were Feds in the crowd on Jan 6th and we know they lied about Covid origins. At this point it's a surprise when they tell the truth.

Government is the problem. That can't be denied.

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

That's a lot of claims most of which aren't supported by evidence. If we're going to talk about democracy and overreach, it helps to stick to verifiable facts. The "No Kings" message is about limiting concentrated power not about partisan conspiracies or violence. If you want to discuss that issue seriously, I'm all for it. But throwing around unproven accusations doesn't get us anywhere.

---

It's funny you want verifiable facts. Here is one. Trump was elected. He's not a monarch unlike the lies you side tells

pdc093 said:

---

F.A.F.O......they're THERE.

PORTLAND: Anti-ICE “protestors” and Antifa militants pretend like they’re big and tough until they get BEAR SPRAYED by federal agents. pic.twitter.com/ZWT90h5SLK

— D. Scott @eclipsethis2003 (@eclipsethis2003) October 18, 2025

---

I wish she'd not breathe a little more quietly.

Gigemtilllastbreath said:

---

The "No Kings" protests aren't about monarchy literally returning, they're symbolic. The concern is about presidential overreach and defending democratic norms. Even if we technically have no king, some people worry that certain political figures act as though they're above accountability. You don't have to agree, but that's the idea behind it, not that we're suddenly crowning royalty.

---

It's just about Trump

Honestly, I can't argue with a lot of that. There's definitely a pattern of government overreach, selective transparency, and manipulation of narratives no matter which party's in charge. The public's trust is so eroded because it feels like the people in power protect each other instead of the citizens they're supposed to serve.

It's not crazy to think both parties and the bureaucracy have gotten too comfortable with being unaccountable. Whether it's the FBI, the media, or political insiders, it feels like there's one set of rules for them and another for everyone else. That's exactly why so many people are fed up and looking for someone who will actually challenge that system.