aggiehawg said:
No, it wasn't. Our judiciary stinks on ice. Hell, a computer expert hacked a Dominion machine just a few feet in front of a federal judge in Georgia within a minute using only a ball point pen but what did that judge do? After a trial? Quietly dismissed the case several months later.
And you have to remember how Dominion was created by Obama and the Holder Justice Department. o Dominion has always had powerful friends.
Oh, none of this matters though. None of this proves there was any voter fraud ....
- Not air-gapped and connected to the Internet? Doesn't prove massive fraud.
- Outdated software with known vulnerabilities? Doesn't prove massive fraud.
- Missing or broken seals required on voting hardware? Doesn't prove massive fraud.
- Chain of custody documentation missing? Doesn't prove massive fraud.
- Runbeck anomalies galore, all going against their core, stated rules? Doesn't prove massive fraud.
- An unauthorized user going to machines and scripting failed log attempts, amazingly enough to be the amount needed to roll the access logs? Doesn't prove massive fraud.
... and rather than a court take these cases up, allow for discovery to prove or disprove fraud? "The Plaintiff's have no standing."
All just one big coincidence ... nothing to see here. Hundreds of millions of dollars spent on the worst solution possible, or those dollars provided EXACTLY what was required. A vulnerable system that could be manipulated and where anomalies could be dismissed as incompetence.