James Comey 86 47

79,514 Views | 785 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by BMX Bandit
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocky Rider said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

PJYoung said:




Dangerous precedent was set with the fake Russian collusion, jailing of people associated with Trump, fake rape charges, and ridiculous banking charges in New York.


No one is going to jail because Trump decided to protect his billionaire pedo friends. It's the art of the deal. He offers them freedom and they pay for his ballroom and library, campaigns he needs to win, etc. in his mind he can't change the past, but he can profit in the future.

Answer the question " why haven't all of the Epstein files been released - which is required by law" and it's easy to understand why the pedos aren't being prosecuted.


This is a thread about Comey threatening the president. I don't understand how Epstein got dragged into this. TDS.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocky Rider said:

Science Denier said:

Rocky Rider said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

PJYoung said:




Dangerous precedent was set with the fake Russian collusion, jailing of people associated with Trump, fake rape charges, and ridiculous banking charges in New York.


No one is going to jail because Trump decided to protect his billionaire pedo friends. It's the art of the deal. He offers them freedom and they pay for his ballroom and library, campaigns he needs to win, etc. in his mind he can't change the past, but he can profit in the future.

Answer the question " why haven't all of the Epstein files been released - which is required by law" and it's easy to understand why the pedos aren't being prosecuted.

Which pedos does your lib newsletter say are being protected?
Which files does your lib newsletter say haven't been released?

You should get your money back, at least for this issue.


My lib news letter? Research my posts on this forum if you'd like. I voted for Trump 3x and never voted for a dim. I don't wear blinders. I don't assume that just because Trump is a better choice than Kamala that he walks on water. Even Christ rebuked his own team when they were out of line ("get behind me Satan").

Don't be blinded by a favorable bias towards a politician. They will disappoint you if you do. .

Quoting "Epstein files" is just flat stupid. Sorry, that's the way it is. You are just spouting lib talking points that are spewed by the same concocted narrative thrown out there because there is nothing left.

Maybe you are a Cornyn supporter?
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5859963-justice-department-evidence-comey-case/

Quote:

"You can't yell 'fire' in a movie theater because it could really harm a lot of people, if there's a stampede out of there," said former federal prosecutor Evan Gotlob. "So, you can't freely threaten public officials."

Always nice knowing when a former federal prosecutor is quoting dicta from a case that was later overturned.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

barring any potential delays that may occur


Guess what?

I'm Gipper
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No way his smug arse has failed to cover the same in all his "notes", interviews and other.

Hang em high from the tall oak tree for all the people to see.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Just change the law so the statue of limitations doesn't exist any more.

That's how it works, Right?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quick side note, what the heck is this lady drinking across 3 giant coffee mugs? I mean, I get it, I would need those filled with jack and diet in order to withstand sitting at the same table as Comey, but she's on his same side.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She NEEDS caffeine!
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is urine in one, poop in another, and coffee is the last
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

There is urine in one, poop in another, and coffee is the last

Figured since it was cnn all mugs are filled with the **** they then spew…
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

At some point, his words will be used him in a court of law I hope. This to me demonstrates the ongoing threat/conspiracy he supports.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He was intolerably smug on MTP today. Wish nothing but pain and suffering for his remaining days before the eternity that awaits him in the fiery confines below.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like the proper approach is to just begin leaking the evidence against him. Convict him in public.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

DeschutesAg said:

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5859963-justice-department-evidence-comey-case/

Quote:

"You can't yell 'fire' in a movie theater because it could really harm a lot of people, if there's a stampede out of there," said former federal prosecutor Evan Gotlob. "So, you can't freely threaten public officials."

Always nice knowing when a former federal prosecutor is quoting dicta from a case that was later overturned.

You know what he left out?

You CAN yell "fire!" in a crowded theater if there's actually a fire
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



It's May. If there were any legit constitutional issues. would not take months to brief them.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Polling has indicated these constitutional questions are best answered in the month of October in even years.

It's odd, but that's what it shows.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Polling has indicated these constitutional questions are best answered in the month of October in even years.

It's odd, but that's what it shows.

I'm just saying that a federal judge would know that legal memorandums in support of a motion to dismiss are not that long. Most federal districts have page limits, in fact.

Just reeks of desperation on Comey's part. And it gives DOJ the heads up on what is coming and they are working on their own rebuttal without even seeing what kind of BS Comey's team Grok queries produce.
Bucketrunner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He deserves to suffer and suffer a lot.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was making a funny about how obvious they are in scheduling for election impact.

But Trump 2.0 seems to be a few steps ahead of shenanigans this time.

****in Comey.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh I understood the reference. I was pointing out that if the judge grants that continuance for that reason is agenda not law driven.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Roger that. Always appreciate your insight Hawg.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Oh I understood the reference. I was pointing out that if the judge grants that continuance for that reason is agenda not law driven.


This is hilarious.


The government is unopposed to the briefing schedule and moving trial. You won't find a case anywhere in which a court denied such a request!

No one ever expected this case to be tried the summer. It has nothing to do with an agenda.



I'm Gipper
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The good news is that Comey is paying through the nose in legal fees. What comes around goes around.
Iced-T14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

The good news is that Comey is paying through the nose in legal fees. What comes around goes around.

He'll be able to recoup it through Trumps IRS settlement fund
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iced-T14 said:

nortex97 said:

The good news is that Comey is paying through the nose in legal fees. What comes around goes around.

He'll be able to recoup it through Trumps IRS settlement fund

The settlement fund is from the DOJ and only applies to actions under the Biden admin.

No word if Rubio or Vance will setup a fund for Comey.

Comey deserves to be underneath the rubbish heap in Gitmo. Hopefully he gets what he deserves.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

aggiehawg said:

Oh I understood the reference. I was pointing out that if the judge grants that continuance for that reason is agenda not law driven.


This is hilarious.


The government is unopposed to the briefing schedule and moving trial. You won't find a case anywhere in which a court denied such a request!

No one ever expected this case to be tried the summer. It has nothing to do with an agenda.




You couldn't write a memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss in a couple of weeks? On sketchy constitutional grounds? Granted, needs some tapdancing creative thought to make that stuff up but since delay is the goal and providing appeal fodder, can't be that difficult.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd just add, if that (electoral impact of his trial) is his intent, it's a pathetic fail likely caused by his inflated ego and sense of righteousness. The left still dislikes him for failing to stop Trump both times (before the election in 2016 and after he was sworn in). If his and other russiagate trials make the headlines around October, it will only inspire more GOP turnout and wins, not the opposite.

But I'm not surprised, his sureness as to being morally pure and always the smartest guy in the room is what led to so many of his failures.
AlexNguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

The good news is that Comey is paying through the nose in legal fees. What comes around goes around.

Some Dem billionaire will pick up the tab.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

aggiehawg said:

Oh I understood the reference. I was pointing out that if the judge grants that continuance for that reason is agenda not law driven.


This is hilarious.


The government is unopposed to the briefing schedule and moving trial. You won't find a case anywhere in which a court denied such a request!

No one ever expected this case to be tried the summer. It has nothing to do with an agenda.




Exactly. Never trust someone who won't link to the actual order, especially when it's on RECAP for free.
Quote:

Undersigned counsel has discussed this Motion with FAUSA Phil Aubart, who states that the Government does not oppose this proposed schedule.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nced.227449/gov.uscourts.nced.227449.14.0_1.pdf
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

On sketchy constitutional grounds? Granted, needs some tapdancing creative thought to make that stuff up


Can you explain your basis for saying it's "sketchy" constitutional grounds?

I went back and read the posts from when the posts from when the indictment came through today. I didn't see a single poster that thinks this was a "true threat" as defined by constitutional law. If it's not a true threat, then it's protected by the first amendment.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AlexNguyen said:

nortex97 said:

The good news is that Comey is paying through the nose in legal fees. What comes around goes around.

Some Dem billionaire will pick up the tab.



Nope, woke NGO that Biden wired billions to before change of power.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.