***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

330,655 Views | 3128 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Rapier108
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Immigration judges are fed up with Article 3 judges making ridiculous politically-driven rulings…but this is one I'd predict the ACLU unfortunately will win on.
Quote:

BOSTON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The top U.S. immigration judge has told her colleagues that they are not bound by a federal court ruling that declared the Trump administration cannot place thousands of people in mandatory detention without an opportunity to be released on bond.

That directive came in an email Chief Immigration Judge Teresa Riley sent her colleagues on Tuesday that the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts attached to a filing on Friday in Boston federal court in a lawsuit challenging the administration's policy of denying bond hearings.

The ACLU said the email was evidence that "the government has deliberately and systematically instructed every Immigration Judge in the country not to comply with final declaratory judgments."

The civil rights group said the statement directs judges to disregard court rulings by U.S. District Judge Sunshine Sykes in Riverside, California, and U.S. District Judge Patti Saris in Boston in separate class action lawsuits brought on behalf of people who were already living in the United States when they were detained. Both judges held that denying people bond hearings was unlawful.

Quote:

But Sykes, whose case is a nationwide class action, in a ruling in December said that the administration's interpretation was contrary to law and that, as a result, the board's ruling was "no longer controlling."
Yet Riley in Tuesday's email told her colleagues that because Sykes did not issue an injunction, the board's decision "remains binding precedent on agency adjudicators."

Lawyers with the ACLU said that prior to that email, the immigration court in Massachusetts had begun holding bond hearings again, consistent with Saris' decision.

Yet the lawyers said they received multiple reports on Thursday that an immigration judge was denying detainee requests for bond hearings.


Law fight! Courts defying courts!

I dunno the immigration courts are their own domain. We'll see what happens.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No tariff ruling today. I'm thinking the longer the tariff decision goes, the better the chances are that SCOTUS rules in Trump's favor. But I probably know nothing.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This seems... odd to me...

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tariff case is still pending and Alito, Roberts and Thomas haven't written an opinion yet (4 to go I think, also including the women's sports one).
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You have to figure Roberts will author the tariff case.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Jurist said:

You have to figure Roberts will author the tariff case.

I don't gamble, but I'd put money on that.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YellAg2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stamping back the trans lunacy, gutting the VRA, and ending birthright citizenship potentially all in the same SCOTUS term....the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the left would be off the charts.
XpressAg09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is big.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
XpressAg09 said:

This is big.
Yup. Not the Founders' intention.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Leftists are melting down, claiming that federal agents are now allowed to gun down anyone they want.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.