LMCane said:

---

imagine the type of demon one has to be:

1. claim you are the only "real" friend of Charlie Kirk and that is why you are coming up with hundreds of alternative scenarios other than the actual murderer

2. blame the Jews

3. blame TPUSA

4. blame Erika Kirk

5. State you will stop attacking Erika if Erika asks you to stop

6. refuses to stop attacking Erika after she asked you to stop

7. create a whole new series attacking the wife of your "friend" claiming she is traficking in young girls

---

This is by far the most evil and twisted component. A grieving wife and mother-of-surviving-children should be completely off limits. You have to be an evil vindictive sack-of-sh**, or just completely psychotic, to attack a woman whose husband and father of her children was just gruesomly assassinated.

Add on that so many of Charlie's "friends" aren't speaking up for Erika. Just horrible.

Time for Erika Kirk to stop playing nice and sue the psycho ***** for slander and defamation.

Rapier108 said:

---

Time for Erika Kirk to stop playing nice and sue the psycho ***** for slander and defamation.

---

Candace is begging her to.

Farmer_J said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Time for Erika Kirk to stop playing nice and sue the psycho ***** for slander and defamation.

---

Candace is begging her to.

---

Of course, because in her delusional mind, she thinks that discovery is going to give her access to all of Erika's life, all of TPUSA, and everything else that will prove all of her conspiracies to be true.

Sounds like a slam dunk then

Rapier108 said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Time for Erika Kirk to stop playing nice and sue the psycho ***** for slander and defamation.

---

Candace is begging her to.

---

Of course, because in her delusional mind, she thinks that discovery is going to give her access to all of Erika's life, all of TPUSA, and everything else that will prove all of her conspiracies to be true.

---

It's a tough scenario for Erika. Candace is a lying piece of **** that deserves to be bankrupted. But there's also the argument of giving Candace more attention than she deserves (which is zero).

Ultimately it would be great to set an example but unfortunately it will also probably cause it to drag along and have more of Candace's braindead supporters continue to harass her. The attention is what Candace craves, so he the best way forward may be to just keep ignoring her.

and to think at one point in time we had posters here who sincerely thought owens should run for president

P.H. Dexippus said:

---

Ben's podcast today is entitled "Candace Owens is Evil". I dunno, but her actions certainly seem that way.

---

Here's a 10 minute excerpt. Candace really is despicable:

.@RealCandaceO is evil. pic.twitter.com/69ZReNQtbD

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 24, 2026

Bongino teeing off on her as well:

ETA: NSFW language.

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Dan Bongino goes ABSOLUTELY HAYWIRE on Candace Owens and others for continuing to target Erika Kirk

"You deserve to feel the flames of hell on every inch of your body."

"We don't want you. Nobody wants you. You are the spawn of Satan."

"Absolute F*CKING… pic.twitter.com/MLtADcjPai

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 24, 2026

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Bongino teeing off on her as well:

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Dan Bongino goes ABSOLUTELY HAYWIRE on Candace Owens and others for continuing to target Erika Kirk

"You deserve to feel the flames of hell on every inch of your body."

"We don't want you. Nobody wants you. You are the spawn of Satan."

"Absolute F*CKING… pic.twitter.com/MLtADcjPai

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 24, 2026

---

Dan Bongino- the new propaganda machine
He has zero credibility for making himself a moron over the JE events. Anytime you forget just play a collection of all his blow hard rants about about what needs to be done and what he would do about lots of things- then just watch what the guy has become. It's sad.

AGHouston11 said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Bongino teeing off on her as well:

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Dan Bongino goes ABSOLUTELY HAYWIRE on Candace Owens and others for continuing to target Erika Kirk

"You deserve to feel the flames of hell on every inch of your body."

"We don't want you. Nobody wants you. You are the spawn of Satan."

"Absolute F*CKING… pic.twitter.com/MLtADcjPai

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 24, 2026

---

Dan Bongino- the new propaganda machine
He has zero credibility for making himself a moron over the JE events. Anytime you forget just play a collection of all his blow hard rants about about what needs to be done and what he would do about lots of things- then just watch what the guy has become. It's sad.

---

So he's wrong about Candace? Got it

AGHouston11 said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Bongino teeing off on her as well:

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Dan Bongino goes ABSOLUTELY HAYWIRE on Candace Owens and others for continuing to target Erika Kirk

"You deserve to feel the flames of hell on every inch of your body."

"We don't want you. Nobody wants you. You are the spawn of Satan."

"Absolute F*CKING… pic.twitter.com/MLtADcjPai

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 24, 2026

---

Dan Bongino- the new propaganda machine
He has zero credibility for making himself a moron over the JE events. Anytime you forget just play a collection of all his blow hard rants about about what needs to be done and what he would do about lots of things- then just watch what the guy has become. It's sad.

---

Take the Epstein crap to the Epstein thread.

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

TRM said:

---

Ben Shapiro hitting vindication levels that shouldn't even be possible pic.twitter.com/0OxF47x5ov

— Avi Bitterman, MD (@AviBittMD) February 24, 2026

---

This is absolutely disgusting. If Candace Owens' mega wealthy husband has a shred of decency, he will have her admitted against her will into a psychiatric ward where she may be able to get the help she needs. 5150 her. She could also use the timeout and complete break from social media. This is a sad and disgusting meltdown.

I have to assume her busband is a complete and utter beta.

---

Her "husband" is a gay British nepo baby whose father is worth 150 million pounds

they have pretty much admitted it was a "transactional" marriage

they dated a whole 17 days before getting engaged.

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

so you agree with your cult leader that Erika Kirk traficked young girls?

(after Candace posted pics of Erika hugging a young girl who turned out to be her niece)

oh yeah, Erika Kirk's mother is also dying of cancer.

but sure, you are correct and the dozens of us on this thread who know Candace is an evil insane conspiracy theorist are just... what?

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Time for Erika Kirk to stop playing nice and sue the psycho ***** for slander and defamation.

---

Candace is begging her to.

---

Of course, because in her delusional mind, she thinks that discovery is going to give her access to all of Erika's life, all of TPUSA, and everything else that will prove all of her conspiracies to be true.

---

It's a tough scenario for Erika. Candace is a lying piece of **** that deserves to be bankrupted. But there's also the argument of giving Candace more attention than she deserves (which is zero).

Ultimately it would be great to set an example but unfortunately it will also probably cause it to drag along and have more of Candace's braindead supporters continue to harass her. The attention is what Candace craves, so he the best way forward may be to just keep ignoring her.

---

I honestly predict that if she doesn't get help, Candace may very well take her own life one of these days. One day her mind is going to clear, and she is going to feel unimaginably bad for visciously tormenting and bullying a grieving widow and mother of children who lost their father in a horrific way.

if she doesn't eventually have crushing remorse, she has no soul, simple as that.

I would not treat the widows of people like Hitler, Osama Bin Laden, the most violent cartel boss etc etc, in this way.

Kashchei said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.

---

No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

A compelling case against Erika Kirk having been a willing accessory to murder of her husband? Or at least being happy about it? No, Candace Owens should have the burden of proof if she is going to make such EXTREME accusations. Good luck...you are relying on a horrible hyper-narcissistic mother who is neglecting her four small children (even though her husband is worth $200+M) so that she can slaner and bully and demonize a woman who recently lost her soulmate and now has to raise two girls without their father.

Good luck with that. Candace is "pretty Kanye" at this point. Actually more diabolical and evil spirited than he ever was even during his worst episodes.

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Candace makes her own case against herself in that she lays out the accusation with zero proof to back it up.

It is not up to us to prove her wrong. It's up to her to prove herself correct, and she fails miserably.

Farmer_J said:

---

Kashchei said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.

---

No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

---

Clueless beyond belief

Farmer_J said:

---

Kashchei said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.

---

No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

---

If someone says the earth is flat should we have to present arguments to counter that idiotic claim too? If you actually think some of her claims sound plausible I'm not really sure what to tell you.

CDUB98 said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Candace makes her own case against herself in that she lays out the accusation with zero proof to back it up.

It is not up to us to prove her wrong. It's up to her to prove herself correct, and she fails miserably.

---

You are certainly under no obligation to prove her wrong.

Now if you criticize the upcoming filth she is putting out you're a "Zionist". What a disgusting loser she is.

Zionists are putting in real work hours promoting our upcoming series. I would like to extend to them all my deepest gratitude.

We are a small team and couldn’t do it without your steadfast commitment to hysterics.🙏

See you tomorrow.

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) February 24, 2026

Well, that's exactly what you have asked us to do.

CDUB98 said:

---

Well, that's exactly what you have asked us to do.

---

No, I didn't. I just said i've been waiting for someone to make a case against her allegations. Instead, I got ten replies name calling and saying they don't have to. lol.

Do you understand the difference between wanting to hear an opposing argument and making an accusation?

Can't prove a negative and can't argue against crazy.

Rapier108 said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Kashchei said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.

---

No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

---

What of her rantings is "plausible"?

The bee cult?
The Jews"
The Egyptians?
TPUSA?
Erika Kirk?
Trump?
The X-Men?
Charlie was in love with her?

The only person she hasn't blamed is the person who pulled the trigger.

---

I don't know pick one, and lets discuss and see where it leads

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Well, that's exactly what you have asked us to do.

---

No, I didn't. I just said i've been waiting for someone to make a case against her allegations. Instead, I got ten replies name calling and saying they don't have to. lol.

Do you understand the difference between wanting to hear an opposing argument and making an accusation?

---

Do you understand the concept of the burden of proof? The person bringing the hairbrained conspiracy theory has the burden of proof. They need to have the receipts. It's not the burden of the sane world to prove a negative(s).

CDUB98 said:

---

Can't prove a negative and can't argue against crazy.

---

That's true, but not all of the allegations are negatives. Let's stick to those.

Farmer_J said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Kashchei said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Every time I see this thread bumped, I looked forward to seeing what today's looney tune version of Candace is saying.

---

Every time I see the thread bumped, I checked to see if someone is going to make a compelling case against what Candace is saying. Or if it's just going to be ranting, raving, or posting a clip of someone else ranting and raving.

---

Two fallacies in one: Shifting the Burden of Proof and Appeal to Ignorance. Impressive.

---

No, it's just I've heard Candace's side of the story. Some of it sounds crazy. Some of it sounds plausible. What I don't hear is someone making a sound argument against it. Just ranting and raving.

Your reply is insinuating I made an accusation which I did not. Then, you argued against that. Technically, that's called a straw man.

---

What of her rantings is "plausible"?

The bee cult?
The Jews"
The Egyptians?
TPUSA?
Erika Kirk?
Trump?
The X-Men?
Charlie was in love with her?

The only person she hasn't blamed is the person who pulled the trigger.

---

I don't know pick one, and lets discuss and see where it leads

---

You said some of the claims "sound plausible." Which claims are you referring to?

Farmer_J said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Well, that's exactly what you have asked us to do.

---

No, I didn't. I just said i've been waiting for someone to make a case against her allegations. Instead, I got ten replies name calling and saying they don't have to. lol.

Do you understand the difference between wanting to hear an opposing argument and making an accusation?

---

Farmer, I saw what you see. And hopped on one of these attack-Candace threads because of this beauty:


I keep feeling more and more sorry for her children.
4 little ones who want and need her...a husband worth $250MM...and she's melting down in front of the entire world, like she suffocates when she is not getting crazy amounts of attention.

She needs real psychological help. And Jesus.

As you can tell, we have some real winners in the house. For whatever reason, there's a high investment from a sector here, to discredit her. But sometimes that backfires, and people go look for themselves. The truth is she's getting information from somewhere, and she is connecting some dots, and within that, there are some serious questions that aren't getting answered.

I have a problem with her rolling something out that could be important, in an episodic way whereby she profits. But she's not crazy. a touch of the narcissist for sure, like a lot people in front of the camera.