fasthorse05 said:

---

I've got to put this one out there.

However, there's a caveat on who's doing the podcast.

I love Lara Logan. She's a huge believer in freedom and liberty and was, at one time, a hell of a reporter. I still think she's an outstanding reporter, but, she's old and probably doesn't bring the truth every single time. Not because she's doesn't have the same vitriol for corruption, I don't believe she's as competent as she used to be. However, I do believe the majority of this is accurate and truthful, I suggest you figure out which statements are the real deal.

Besides, there's a lot of good stuff in here about Smartmatic, but it's possible Hawg may know more than this podcast divulges. I've been well aware of the SOB from Venuzuela who ran the Tarrant County elections for years. BTW, even if Logan has lost a little shine, it doesn't mean the guests she has on don't bring the goods.

Enjoy!

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0RFHbSHZoJtA5ZlKeq64EO?si=e4832091527e426e

---

---

BTW, this podcast was the very first time I'd heard of Casa del Sol, which is apparently the cartel of all of the cartels. Once you're 50% of the way through this interview, Trump going into Venezuela will make 100% senses. It's not drug or oil related.

---

This interview of Svetlana Lokhova by Lara Logan from last week is very on topic for this thread. I did not realize that she had been unwittingly groomed to play the part of honeypot to take out Michael Flynn since back in 2015. She was set up by her professor at Cambridge, Christopher Andrew, who was MI5.

Ep 58 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan https://www.podbean.com/ea/pb-e97u8-1a282b2

Lokhova has read every document and can recite every detail and explain the connections. It is really impressive how she is able to lay out the sequence of several key events that happened on the same or successive days and illuminate the reason. You can see the conspiracy being spun in real time.

Lokhova is very smart and understands in hindsight that if you have a "chance meeting" with someone who is a senior IC member, it wasn't a chance meeting and to never be outside the presence of a corroborating third party witness.

She's a good follow, but is so active on X I can't really do it, as it is just too many posts.

These are the files Chris Wray, Lisa Monaco, Alan Kohler, Avril Haines and co later retroactively reclassified and raided President Trump’s home for.

Steele and Halper both operated out of Cambridge, England, they ran anti-Trump offshore operations for Brennan and Comey, on… https://t.co/gSwaJYspQh

— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) February 2, 2026

She's probably right about this suit also;

Why is the Judicial Watch having to sue the Trump DoJ for ten-year old documents with evidence against Obama, Hillary, Brennan, Comey and co?

Where is the promised transparency?

This is so disappointing. pic.twitter.com/gWihashRWV

— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) February 2, 2026

Not astounding, but Mitchell delivers accurate information.

Quote:

---

(2) Cleta Mitchell on X: "And here's the REAL kicker about the 2020 Fulton County absentee ballots: 148,319 absentee ballots were counted in the 2020 General Election from Fulton County… but only 125,784 voters are recorded as casting an absentee ballot. There are 25,534 more ballots counted than" / X

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

It takes a huge number of people involved to arrange for voter fraud at the voting booth or ballot mailing to generate enough votes to swing an election reliably.

It takes only a tiny number of people involved to manipulate the counting and tallying process and it is much easier to arrange the necessary outcome and cover tracks. Any modern voter fraud isn't in the voting, it is in the counting.

---

As long as you include the decision to count questionable ballots, I agree.

If I recall correctly, if the reader couldn't decide who/what you voted for it had to be adjudicated. And at adjudication the person could literally put whatever they wanted. So if you put a check mark by Donald Trump, the person doing the adjudication could put Biden. There were supposed to be watchers or whatever at each adjudication area, but not sure if that was the case.

Also, I think after the adjudication a new ballot is printed and the old ballot image was either erased or replaced with the new.

BREAKING: On Aug. 4, 2016, FBI official Peter Strzok attended a meeting with CIA officials as part of an interagency group on Russia and Trump created by Brennan. Known as the “fusion cell,” the group was quarterbacked by CIA official Elizabeth “Liz” Vogt, who said, "The White…

— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) February 7, 2026

Additional edification.

Quote:

---

https://x.com/MJTruthUltra

---

Here we go.

“It’s not going to end well” for the corporations and other institutions who supported President Trump.

Jake Sullivan and Susan Rice send a coordinated message.

The band is back together. https://t.co/9kOOChywEx pic.twitter.com/3HT7ZUnRyo

— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) February 20, 2026

They are undoubtedly threatening people about how they will seek revenge for Trump defeating them.

Long article from John Solomon about recent John Brennan subpoenas and goes back through the history of the discredited ICA from 2016 they cooked up using the Steele dossier to lie about Putin helping Trump get elected.

Quote:

---

Contradicting the Senate panel's conclusions, the recently-declassified House analysis provided further detail on how Brennan ensured the dossier would be included in the ICA, despite pushback from others at the CIA. The report stated that "the DCIA [Brennan] rejected requests from CIA professionals that the dossier be kept out of the ICA."

The report cited a senior intelligence officer present at a meeting with Brennan where "two senior CIA officers one from Russia operations and the other from Russia analysis argued with DCIA that the dossier should not be included at all in the ICA, because it failed to meet basic tradecraft standards."

The same officer said that Brennan refused to remove the reference to the dossier and, when Brennan was confronted with the dossier's significant problems, said that Brennan reportedly replied, "Yes, but doesn't it ring true?"

The recently-declassified bombshell House Intelligence Committee report revealed that, despite repeated denials, the 2016 ICA on Russian election meddling pointed to the Steele Dossier when attempting to underpin the conclusion that Russian leader Vladimir Putin aspired to help Donald Trump win with the ICA also allegedly ignoring evidence that the Russian leader may have favored (or at least fully expected) a Hillary Clinton victory instead.

The recently-declassified report includes strong evidence that the ICA directly cited the Steele Dossier when the ICA argued that Putin had aspired to help Trump win.

The recently-declassified analysis stated that "contradicting public claims by the DCIA that the dossier 'was not in any way' incorporated into the ICA, the dossier was referenced in the ICA main body text, and further detailed in a two-page CIA annex."

The House report stated that "by devoting nearly two pages of ICA text to summarizing the dossier in a high-profile assessment intended for the President and President-elect, the ICA misrepresented both the significance and credibility of the dossier reports."

---

Brennan himself was in London coordinating with British intelligence (as usual) recently (along with Gina Haspel), when the subpoena dropped on him.

In early November 2025, former CIA Director John Brennan, who DNI Gabbard said was involved in the treasonous conspiracy led by Obama, also travelled to London, England.

Gina Haspel, former CIA Director, was also recently in the UK. During Russiagate, Haspel was CIA London… https://t.co/FNRZQ08vGR pic.twitter.com/GE3dMBif7N

— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) February 1, 2026

These people are amazingly awful. And people will put them back into power. These people do not believe in democracy.

Is Baracks security detail made up of Denzel, Diddy and Megan the Stallion look alikes?

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

These people are amazingly awful. And people will put them back into power. These people do not believe in democracy.

---

Wait until you see this one from Susan Rice.

When your side/movement get so incredibly brazen to not have to specify, name names, or name the actions and/or the law they believe was broken, just that they're coming after you, then we have a staggering problem. The amazing thing is she mentions corporations.

The only thing she didn't specifically say was "as soon as we occupy the executive, any and all conservatives will be in prison". I'm surprised she didn't say "with no trial". I guess she knows they dominate the judges.

Quote:

---

(1) DC_Draino on X: "Susan Rice is a big reason why Somalian daycares are stealing billions. She's a big reason by major Democrat cities are stealing statewide elections. Now she wants to weaponize the federal gov't (once again) to go after anyone that wasn't sufficiently loyal to the Marxist" / X

---

With Trump, a trial was just a process. It wasn't real and it wasn't constitutional. They don't care.

Quote:

---

I guess she knows they dominate the judges.

---

The next Democrat President will nominate Boasberg to take the baton from John Roberts and be the next Chief Justice. John Thune will vote to confirm and John McCain will smile from his roost in the hereafter.

ETA: ...and Dan Bongino would disparage me for being a black-piller.

Hmmm….

Oh my ears and whiskers

That lawyer was Kathy Ruemmler

Obama's fixer and Epstein's buddy Kathy Ruemmler https://t.co/ZpVIY94zmY

— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) February 22, 2026

This is the reason they have always hated Trump.

The man they refer for as Hitler, who they accuse of all sorts of corruption, is the only reason any of this sees the light of day.

Americas going to have to drink the bleach if they want this to stop, cause the corruption in career politicians is massive, deep seated, and resilient as deadly mold spores living off their zombie hosts.

Just a friendly reminder that this thread is not a catch all thread for all of the different reporting going on related to various investigations surrounding President Donald Trump. This thread has been going long enough that every user should have a clear understanding of the subject. If you need to go back and read through the earlier parts of the thread to understand the subject, please do so.

Thanks and Gig 'Em!

This video is about the Mueller probe

Pencil neck should never be able to be in the same room with anything classified.

🚨ALERT: A high-level Democrat whistleblower just blew the lid off what could be one of the biggest political scandals in U.S history! Adam Schiff personally authorized and directed his team to leak classified intelligence to hurt Trump during the height of the Russiagate frenzy. pic.twitter.com/ZTjks7h1cJ

— TRUMP SUPPORTER (@_Postive_Vibes) March 10, 2026

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

Pencil neck should never be able to be in the same room with anything classified.

🚨ALERT: A high-level Democrat whistleblower just blew the lid off what could be one of the biggest political scandals in U.S history! Adam Schiff personally authorized and directed his team to leak classified intelligence to hurt Trump during the height of the Russiagate frenzy. pic.twitter.com/ZTjks7h1cJ

— TRUMP SUPPORTER (@_Postive_Vibes) March 10, 2026

---

Not new info to me.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Adam Schiff should be tried and hung for treason.

---

Should be but business as usual-nothing will happen. It's all one big party.

I would be okay if they did away with the FBI as it currently exists and create a new organization with a completely new set of rules/guidance. Pretty obvious the current organization is rotten to the core.

Aggieland Proud said:

---

I would be okay if they did away with the FBI as it currently exists and create a new organization with a completely new set of rules/guidance. Pretty obvious the current organization is rotten to the core.

---

ETA: misread your post.

The FBI has always been rotten to the core. It was founded on blackmail and corruption.

Quote:

---

Most of the files on Round River, Plasmic Echo, and Arctic Frost were buried from Patel's view when he arrived in what were known as prohibited access files, a tactic used during the Wray-era of the FBI to shield from view politically sensitive cases inside the bureau's case management system known as Sentinel.

That left only certain officials aware of their existence, often in hidden files in secure storage areas known as sensitive compartmented information facilities, or SCIFs.

---

Under Comey before him, too. Sydney Powell was tearing her hair out over what was supposed to be in the Sentinel system but was somehow "missing" when she was defending Michael Flynn. For instance, that the FBI had put Flynn's FARA lawyers in a trap (Covington, Burling) creating a massive conflict of interest with their own client. Flynn's guilty plea was not only coerced by the FBI threats against him and his son but also by his own lawyers who were also being coerced.

Powell knew there was proof of that which the FBI (and Team Mueller) were hiding within Sentinel yet was unsuccessful in her repeated efforts to find it.

Grassley got another whistle blower to provide information on the Phares investigation where Kevin Clinesmith again deceived the court to further spying in search of a crime (as with Carter Page):

Quote:

---

What makes this especially troubling is not simply that the investigations came up empty, but that Clinesmith knew they had while the surveillance was still ongoing, according to the whistleblower cited in Grassley's letter. Rather than ensuring that the court and the Department of Justice were fully and accurately informed, the newly uncovered report suggests he withheld critical exculpatory findings that undermined the legal basis for continued monitoring.

The document unearthed by Grassley is an FBI FD-302 report from December 2020, which records a member of Robert Mueller's special counsel team stating that, after months of investigation, it had become obvious that Phares had been truthful and that there was no case against him. It is not known who the whistleblower within the Mueller team is, nor how Grassley obtained the document.

In the words of the whistleblower, "there were no corroborating facts that tied [Phares] to certain facts that we thought were originally true … there was nothing confirming [Phares] received a large money payment, and nothing confirming [Phares] had a meeting in another country for the purposes of the initial allegation."

---

Quote:

---

The Grassley material adds another layer, indicating that Clinesmith employed the same deceptive tactics in the Phares investigation. The structural vulnerability in both cases is identical. FISA applications are one-sided: the court sees only what the FBI and DOJ choose to present, with no opposing counsel and no independent verification. That asymmetry places an extraordinary duty of candor on the government. When information is withheld or falsified, the court is not merely misled on a technicality; it is stripped of the only mechanism guarding against abuse of the government's surveillance powers.

The implications are enormous. We now know that FISA was used against at least two Trump advisers, with a minimum of eight warrant applications spanning two years.

The record makes clear that Clinesmith's role was neither peripheral nor isolated. His involvement across multiple FISA matters, combined with the allegation that he concealed material information not just from the court but even from colleagues within the government, demonstrates conduct that was sustained and deliberate, far beyond a single lapse in judgment as the public narrative has suggested. He was a central operator exploiting the system at its most vulnerable point, repeatedly misleading the court and hiding the truth from within the government itself.

The obvious question is why Durham treated this as a narrow, isolated offense. If Clinesmith's role in the Phares case was deliberately concealed from Durham and his team, it raises serious questions about who was doing the hiding and what else may have been suppressed. There could also be legal consequences, particularly if those actions fall within the five-year statute of limitations for additional charges, which they likely do given that Durham's investigation ran through May 2023.

What is beyond dispute is this: Clinesmith engaged in a sustained pattern of misconduct across multiple investigations, knowingly falsifying and withholding information to justify surveillance of innocent American citizens.

---

Of course, Mueller/Durham did nothing about this and Clinesmith got a slap on the wrist. Still a proud member of the notorious DC bar.