Entertainment
Sponsored by

*** UAP THREAD ***

631,857 Views | 6286 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by TKEAg04
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:18p, 9/8/25

Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:26p, 9/8/25
For close textual analysis Protestants, Alberino has a decent 45 min overview of High Strangeness / The Phenomenon. He assumes the validity of 1 Enoch (ie that which has been verified as BC) … which we should also, as is explained in his Book of Enoch version (Amazon) -

Reply Quote
AgBQ-00
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:04p, 9/8/25
not sure how I feel about calling people who are getting the ok from superiors whistleblowers. witnesses sure, but I don't think they fit the whistleblower framework
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:52p, 9/8/25
Reply Quote
Teddy Perkins
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:55a, 9/9/25
Ross's live stream of the hearing.

https://www.youtube.com/live/fKIcd3bfUhI?si=OhK5HON_vNl8_cC5

Dolan's live stream.

https://www.youtube.com/live/UfCzvS2a2sU?si=rVyTLLoqhxPVc-iI

Joe's live X stream.
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teddy Perkins • 9:10a, 9/9/25
Awesome, thanks.

Official link as well, now in progress…

https://www.youtube.com/live/LBKRr5OvF6E
Reply Quote
2 edits
G Martin 87
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:42a, 9/9/25
Dylan Borland is up now.

The video they just showed is yet another black dot on an IR feed. Not going to change any minds.
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:36a, 9/9/25
Major problem is video and photo capture seems to be inherently fuzzy / blocked due to physics manipulations I've heard explained by professionals that are also experiencers but don't understand.

Perhaps only catastrophic disclosure with entities present will truly move the public.
Reply Quote
Teddy Perkins
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:38a, 9/9/25
New UAP video just dropped in the hearing.

Reply Quote
G Martin 87
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teddy Perkins • 11:09a, 9/9/25
OK, that is very interesting. What was the object doing before the video? Where was it headed? Why was it judged to be a threat worth shooting at?
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to G Martin 87 • 11:15a, 9/9/25
As someone basically says in the comments, it appears as if the missile hits it, the missile explodes, the craft remains undamaged, and then debris from the missile gets caught in the craft's gravity field or something and taken along for the ride for a bit. If so, that's absolutely insane.

Regardless, this is a military grade video officially released by a sitting U.S. Congressman showing U.S. forces firing on a UAP.

Crazy.
Reply Quote
4 edits
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:17a, 9/9/25
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:28a, 9/9/25


Reply Quote
1 edit
redline248
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 5:56p, 9/9/25
TCTTS said:
As someone basically says in the comments, it appears as if the missile hits it, the missile explodes, the craft remains undamaged, and then debris from the missile gets caught in the craft's gravity field or something and taken along for the ride for a bit. If so, that's absolutely insane.

Regardless, this is a military grade video officially released by a sitting U.S. Congressman showing U.S. forces firing on a UAP.

Crazy.
My first reaction after reading the tweet and then watching was "missile didn't look ineffective to me." Looked like the thing was knocked off it's course and falling/wobbling for a while. It does look like it stabilizes, though. Caveat: I'm watching on my phone, so will watch again once I get to my pc.

Like another poster, I'm curious what it was doing and why a missile was fired. Strategic placement of the word "allegedly" by the congressmen? I can't tell if he's a non-human believer, or just fishing for the so-called black programs.
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:13p, 9/9/25
I understand that Elizando has become divisive in the Disclosure advocacy community, but what's interesting about Imminent on this re-read is how explicit he is here:

names names and titles, with these very highly credentialed people saying:

"aliens are real, government lies constantly, we have hugely expensive secret programs, people get their careers wrecked when they talk"

Let the dam break
Reply Quote
nomad2007
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:21p, 9/9/25
I wondered in another thread, but I could wonder over here. Why was a drone-fired hellfire used for this intercept, if that's true? They're not an air-to-air missile. They're just not designed for air intercept. They would also be the most likely to "bounce off" since they have impact fuzes and not proximity fuzes.
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nomad2007 • 9:47p, 9/9/25
One plausible reason is that everything civilians like us or professionals like them could think to do …

Has been tried and failed. Some of this will leak and some won't. We have plenty of accounts, many easily accessible via YT videos just above, from the 40s to now, of total failure to engage / stop via a multitude of methods.

And, once again, here's the most fascinating one IMO

https://imgur.com/a/4chan-whistleblower-NXjWQaN
Reply Quote
benchmark
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teddy Perkins • 7:42a, 9/10/25
Teddy Perkins said:
New UAP video just dropped in the hearing.

What are we seeing that absolutely rules out the possibility of a common drone flying about 40-50 mph at maybe 100 ft above the ocean surface?
Reply Quote
1 edit
benchmark
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to benchmark • 7:42a, 9/10/25
nm
Reply Quote
1 edit
TKEAg04
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Redstone • 7:52a, 9/10/25
Redstone said:
One plausible reason is that everything civilians like us or professionals like them could think to do …

Has been tried and failed. Some of this will leak and some won't. We have plenty of accounts, many easily accessible via YT videos just above, from the 40s to now, of total failure to engage / stop via a multitude of methods.

And, once again, here's the most fascinating one IMO

https://imgur.com/a/4chan-whistleblower-NXjWQaN

Especially in the context of everybody that is probably in the know pointing to the ocean....
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to benchmark • 7:52a, 9/10/25
Listen to the video posted above earlier this week regarding sphere networks.

It is impossible that SOME / MANY of these UAPs are not of unknown origin.

Meaning, breaking the known laws of physics constantly COULD be of human origin, but we damned sure don't have that "known" as of now
Reply Quote
watty
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:01a, 9/10/25
When seeing the video yesterday, in all honesty it didn't do much for me. Seems like everyone just wants to believe it's aliens and take at face value that the missile was supposedly unable to damage the thing, even though it was obviously damaged. This quick little explanation makes enough sense, honestly.

Reply Quote
AgBQ-00
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:05a, 9/10/25
we don't know where the pieces came from. They could be part of the missile itself, they could be parts of the craft (whatever it is). But it is something very abnormal in how it reacts.

ETA: Are hellfire missiles course correcting? That one looks to curve before impact and curve away from impact. It looks really odd.
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Reply Quote
1 edit
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:47a, 9/10/25
Steps beyond such videos get very dangerous very quickly:

Where did all the money go? And still go?

Agreements? Underground bases? Kidnapping allowances? Experiments?

As the film Age of Disclosure detailed, we citizens would have to grant mass amnesty for severe crimes, including grave evil, first.
Reply Quote
MW03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to watty • 2:46p, 9/10/25
watty said:
When seeing the video yesterday, in all honesty it didn't do much for me. Seems like everyone just wants to believe it's aliens and take at face value that the missile was supposedly unable to damage the thing, even though it was obviously damaged. This quick little explanation makes enough sense, honestly.



Reminds me of the stories about Howard Hughes hiring meteorologists and shooting, re-shooting, and re-re-shooting dogfighting scenes for Hell's Angels because he found he needed clouds for perspective to demonstrate the speed and agility of the planes. Without clouds in the background, the planes looked stationary.
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:44a, 9/11/25
Reply Quote
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:04a, 9/12/25
Catholic apologist Jimmy Akin, exchanging ideas on an occultist podcast, has significant overlap - detailed in the first 15 minutes - with Protestants Tim Alberino and Michael Heiser in explaining the "unseen realm" …

Focusing on the consolidation of canon era (approx. 300 BC to 300 AD) is very helpful because the Near East worldview of the time was detailed and specific, more so than we tend to be, regarding cosmic entities.

Angel / demon is more accurately angelic-ic and demon-ic, describing behavior and not categorizes of being. The "gods" are real, some able to interact materially, and humans develop their cultural contexts but with discernible commonalities across time and environment.

And definitely doesn't exclude more grounded, materialist creations, spirit and body, such as hominids, as coming from …. somewhere

I keep harping on this because it was big explanatory power, especially for the religious.

Disclosure is coming. We need a metaphysic

Reply Quote
Agristotle
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:56p, 9/12/25
Powerful people have much to lose and little to gain from Disclosure.

Don't hold your breath.
Reply Quote
G Martin 87
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to watty • 3:47p, 9/12/25
watty said:
When seeing the video yesterday, in all honesty it didn't do much for me. Seems like everyone just wants to believe it's aliens and take at face value that the missile was supposedly unable to damage the thing, even though it was obviously damaged. This quick little explanation makes enough sense, honestly.

Similar analysis here by a British "ammunitions expert" who argues that this was an air-to-air test of a Hellfire missile against a soft, slow moving target.

Reply Quote
redline248
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to G Martin 87 • 4:16p, 9/12/25
Ok, so how does that end up in a UAP hearing? They said it was provided by a whistle blower?
Reply Quote
Apache
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:48p, 9/12/25
Quote:
Ok, so how does that end up in a UAP hearing? They said it was provided by a whistle blower?

To distract, obfuscate, discredit & confuse the issue. "Whistleblower" is likely a government shill throwing out crap to cover what is really going on: Skunkworks type advanced autonomous drones. Or Non-Human technology.
Reply Quote
G Martin 87
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to redline248 • 5:09p, 9/12/25
redline248 said:
Ok, so how does that end up in a UAP hearing? They said it was provided by a whistle blower?
If you aren't familiar with analyzing FLIR footage and weapon systems, it's easy to think that what you're looking at is something truly inexplicable. I doubt anyone in that hearing had that kind of expertise. Even Knapp and Corbell, who should know more than most, seemed to accept that the video was definitive proof. Maybe the whistleblower who provided the video thought so too. It's unfortunate that the video wasn't better vetted.
Reply Quote
2 edits
Redstone
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:15p, 9/12/25
I personally believe these 2011 video postings were from a legitimate leak.

Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:47p, 9/16/25
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:49p, 9/16/25
Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 170 of 180 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.