Status:
Uncommitted
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Medium
Arizona State
Medium
Baylor
Medium
BYU
Medium
California
Medium
Colorado State
Medium
Florida State
Medium
Houston
Medium
Michigan
Medium
Minnesota
Medium
Mississippi State
Medium
North Texas
Medium
Ohio State
Medium
Oklahoma
Medium
Oklahoma State
Medium
Oregon
Medium
Oregon State
Medium
Pittsburgh
Medium
Purdue
Medium
San Diego State
Medium
SMU
Medium
TCU
Medium
Texas
Medium
Texas Tech
Medium
Tulane
Medium
Tulsa
Medium
UNLV
Medium
UTEP
Medium
UTSA
Medium
+ 24 More
Videos
(3 Total)
11/1/2025
Highlights: Cibolo Steele routs New Braunfels Canyon to win district
8/30/2025
Highlights: Cibolo Steele cruises past Liberty Hill in 2025 opener
12/30/1969
Regular Season Highlights
Photos
(9 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×