The number of the weekend! 45 hits producing 45 runs. It's good seeing the bats start hot this weekend! I can't wait to see what happens when we get into league play
Post Reply
1 of 1
45
2,263 Views |
16 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by annie88
C-
Really impressed with the way they kept the ball down in the wind and still produced runs by stringing hits together.
jkag89 said:
C-
What's a C-? The post?
Evidently you missed the joke created in game one by one of the resident stormcrows saying the offense was C- at best...That post you quoted is making fun of that person
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.
We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Tennessee Tech is probably a little better team than Elon (our first series last year). To me, I saw marked improvement, especially in plate approach.
Team batting average this weekend was .429, compared to .319 last year. We scored 45 runs, compared to 32 last year.
I would have liked to see better starting pitching, but I think all of us had concerns with pitching this year. Not dominant, but I'd say overall pitching was ok for the first series.
C- is a pretty harsh grade. I'd go with A for offense and B- for pitching.
ETA: I guess I missed the C- joke.....
Team batting average this weekend was .429, compared to .319 last year. We scored 45 runs, compared to 32 last year.
I would have liked to see better starting pitching, but I think all of us had concerns with pitching this year. Not dominant, but I'd say overall pitching was ok for the first series.
C- is a pretty harsh grade. I'd go with A for offense and B- for pitching.
ETA: I guess I missed the C- joke.....
Wabs said:
Tennessee Tech is probably a little better team than Elon (our first series last year). To me, I saw marked improvement, especially in plate approach.
Team batting average this weekend was .429, compared to .319 last year. We scored 45 runs, compared to 32 last year.
I would have liked to see better starting pitching, but I think all of us had concerns with pitching this year. Not dominant, but I'd say overall pitching was ok for the first series.
C- is a pretty harsh grade. I'd go with A for offense and B- for pitching.
ETA: I guess I missed the C- joke.....
Some knuckle head posted after fridays game that he gave the hitting A+++++ and the pitching C-...
Clearly that guy doesnt know ball very well.
Jdb101808 said:Wabs said:
Tennessee Tech is probably a little better team than Elon (our first series last year). To me, I saw marked improvement, especially in plate approach.
Team batting average this weekend was .429, compared to .319 last year. We scored 45 runs, compared to 32 last year.
I would have liked to see better starting pitching, but I think all of us had concerns with pitching this year. Not dominant, but I'd say overall pitching was ok for the first series.
C- is a pretty harsh grade. I'd go with A for offense and B- for pitching.
ETA: I guess I missed the C- joke.....
Some knuckle head posted after fridays game that he gave the hitting A+++++ and the pitching C-...
Clearly that guy doesnt know ball very well.
And others said our offense was C- halfway through Friday's game....
Some people are only happy when they're unhappy.
Lady Aravis said:Jdb101808 said:Wabs said:
Tennessee Tech is probably a little better team than Elon (our first series last year). To me, I saw marked improvement, especially in plate approach.
Team batting average this weekend was .429, compared to .319 last year. We scored 45 runs, compared to 32 last year.
I would have liked to see better starting pitching, but I think all of us had concerns with pitching this year. Not dominant, but I'd say overall pitching was ok for the first series.
C- is a pretty harsh grade. I'd go with A for offense and B- for pitching.
ETA: I guess I missed the C- joke.....
Some knuckle head posted after fridays game that he gave the hitting A+++++ and the pitching C-...
Clearly that guy doesnt know ball very well.
And others said our offense was C- halfway through Friday's game....
HAHAHAHA... big dummies
I get being pessimistic with how last year went and given the competition level, but you have to be hyper critical to come out of this weekend upset.
Our front line starters need to be better when we play better competition and there are probably a few individual ABs that you can be critical of. But you could tell there were significant approach/process improvements from last year that lead me to believe this team is better coached and capable of reaching their potential. I'm not at all saying we should pencil this team into Omaha, but I get the optimism after this weekend.
Our front line starters need to be better when we play better competition and there are probably a few individual ABs that you can be critical of. But you could tell there were significant approach/process improvements from last year that lead me to believe this team is better coached and capable of reaching their potential. I'm not at all saying we should pencil this team into Omaha, but I get the optimism after this weekend.
ensign_beedrill said:
Some people are only happy when they're unhappy.
Most
themissinglink said:
I get being pessimistic with how last year went and given the competition level, but you have to be impossible to please to come out of this weekend upset.
FIFY
I know it was "only" Tennessee Tech, but 23 runs is 23 runs. Our swings looked MUCH better than last year where something just felt off. These numbers are obviously not sustainable, but I think we'll keep hitting well.
We were losing 2-0 to Elon in the B6 on opening day last year. Was a 3-2 nail biter for a few more innings until Binderup hit a HR to make it 4-2 in the B8. Everyone from Jace to Gavin on down was pressing. Was surprisingly nerve wracking at the time but was ultimately a sign of things to come.
We were never really in danger like that this weekend outside of the first game where it was a little close for comfort in the middle innings until Sorrell broke it open and we poured it on after.
In the grand scheme it might not mean much but at least eye test wise we looked like a much better team.
We were never really in danger like that this weekend outside of the first game where it was a little close for comfort in the middle innings until Sorrell broke it open and we poured it on after.
In the grand scheme it might not mean much but at least eye test wise we looked like a much better team.
We are much more relaxed, disciplined at the plate, and have no aspirations to lead the league in HRs unlike the expectations of last years murderous hitting line up. There was too much energy in trying to live up to the hype that it killed our plate appearances. Now we're back down to earth and exciting to see. Will be interesting to see how we handle SEC weekend starters.Fairview20 said:
We were losing 2-0 to Elon in the B6 on opening day last year. Was a 3-2 nail biter for a few more innings until Binderup hit a HR to make it 4-2 in the B8. Everyone from Jace to Gavin on down was pressing. Was surprisingly nerve wracking at the time but was ultimately a sign of things to come.
We were never really in danger like that this weekend outside of the first game where it was a little close for comfort in the middle innings until Sorrell broke it open and we poured it on after.
In the grand scheme it might not mean much but at least eye test wise we looked like a much better team.
Yeah, but it's really not good unless it's 46.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Featured Stories
See All
Bubble threatens to burst if Bucky Ball can't beat Ole Miss
by Olin Buchanan
11:51
8h ago
2.4k
Three freshmen homer in come-from-behind effort
by Richard Zane
Elko stresses A&M's heightened urgency, need for consistency
by Olin Buchanan
Scouting Report: Texas A&M vs. Ole Miss
by Tom Schuberth
RAB87
FINAL from Blue Bell: No. 24 Texas A&M 8, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 3
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
11
DaAggies
Devin Price back in the program to start coaching career
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8
Hambone09
FINAL from Blue Bell: No. 24 Texas A&M 8, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 3
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
7