Outdoors
Sponsored by

Paging Caladan - compact binoculars

951 Views | 7 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by TRD-Ferguson
malenurse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure this has been addressed before, but frankly, I'm too old and tool lazy to search.

Taking a Rhine River cruise in the fall. My go to Bushnell's got knocked out of alignment. Need a "nice" set of compact binoculars.

I travel light, so size and weight are a premium
Assuming best bet is 8x42 or 8x25
Soft cap at $250, but willing to go higher if value is there

These will primarily be used while on board just cruising. Probably will take them on excursions occasionally
The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But, it's still on the list.
Caladan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
malenurse said:

I travel light, so size and weight are a premium
Assuming best bet is 8x42 or 8x25
Soft cap at $250, but willing to go higher if value is there

These will primarily be used while on board just cruising. Probably will take them on excursions occasionally

Since you specifically mention size/weight, then you should consider an 8x25 compact binocular. These will be very easy to travel with as they don't take up much space. This also means that you are more likely to actually take them with you when you get off the boat. At your price range, look at the 8x25 Nikon Travelite or Prostaff ATB, and also the Pentax U-series. Be aware that Pentax also makes an 8x21 U-series, and you don't want that one.
While you are shopping for an 8x25, also see what the Zeiss Terra 8x25 costs. It will be more expensive than the above, but it is also noticeably better.

I would not recommend an 8x42 for your particular case. These are just too bulky for your stated need. I would bet dollars to donuts that if you buy one, that it will only take a short bit of time for you to decide that the added weight and bulk just isn't worth the effort.

All that being said, I do think that if you are going to own just one binocular, then you should also consider an 8x30 or 32. These will provide a noticeably brighter and wider image than an 8x25, but IMO this increase in performance does not come at burdensome increase in size and weight. IOW, you can't get either in a shirt pocket, but you can get either one in a jacket pocket. The Nikon Prostaff 7 8x30 would make for an excellent travel companion. These will typically put you a bit over $200. Another to consider is the slightly larger 8x32 Kowa SV II, which is on sale right now at Kowa's website for $149. This is probably the best buy in a small bino right now. Supposedly its field of view is ~446' at 1000yds, which is only four feet less than the vaunted Swarovski NL. I really like the size and weight of the SV II, but then again, YMMV.

C
malenurse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you very much, just ordered the Kowas
The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But, it's still on the list.
Csikos314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Caladan - Thanks so much for the info! I just ordered also.
Caladan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cool beans, ya'll. Let me know what happens, if you can.

C
TRD-Ferguson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Caladan, my current pair of binoculars are 50 years old. They're Nikon 6x35. I need to replace those.

We spend most of our time traveling in a van and camping on BLM land. Checking out birds, wildlife, landscapes etc. We're taking a small ship "discovery"cruise to Alaska next year.

Would you recommend I purchase one the binoculars mentioned above or something more powerful like a 10x42?

Thanks
Caladan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRD-Ferguson said:

Caladan, my current pair of binoculars are 50 years old. They're Nikon 6x35. I need to replace those.

We spend most of our time traveling in a van and camping on BLM land. Checking out birds, wildlife, landscapes etc. We're taking a small ship "discovery"cruise to Alaska next year.

Would you recommend I purchase one the binoculars mentioned above or something more powerful like a 10x42?

Thanks

Traveling out of a van allows you to choose just about any binocular, and certainly a 10x42 would be a great choice since you specifically mention wildlife/birds. However, I would not want to take a 42mm bino on a cruise, of any type. I have been to Alaska and Antarctic cruises on a small 80 person boat, a 390 person boat, and a 950 person boat, and despite the huge variety of activities across these three cruises, found that a good 8x32 was plenty for pretty much everything. Yes, me being me I did have other binos as well, but I used either a Leica 8x32 ULHD+ or a Swarovski 8x32 EL SV more than anything else. I never once felt undergunned because I didn't have a 10x.

If you can only find space in your life for one binocular, I would say get the best 8x32 you can afford as IMO that size makes for great "general purpose" bino. OTOH, if you can swing it, I would say first get the most expensive 8x32 you can comfortably afford, and then at some point in the future get a nice 10x42. That would give you a great amount of flexibility, especially since there are two of you anyway. And if the Kowa I mentioned above is all that you want to spend, that is still a great place to start, and you can sink more money into a really nice 10x42 later on.

hth,
C
TRD-Ferguson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you Caladan!
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.