Minnesota AG says 'there is no statute of limitations on murder', Renee Good

2,552 Views | 34 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by Detmersdislocatedshoulder
annie88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:55a, 1/16/26
AG
Well, Renee Good was not murdered. It was self-defense. This is absolute bull*****

I'm so sick of these vile people.
Not only for this, but I truly pray we never have another Democrat president again.

These *******s truly think that she was the innocent victim here and the ice agent was the aggressor. He shot self-defense. And they're saying that the people in power now are the corrupt ones when it's they that are. I truly loathe these people. Their lies and deceit and disgusting behavior just gets worse every day.

And they really think all the violence that is in the streets right now against police officers and the average American is something that we can't un see? But again they're siding with the criminals? Hey Democrats, **** off.

Following the fatal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)-involved shooting of Renee Nicole Good last Wednesday in Minneapolis, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison emphasized that "there is no statute of limitations on murder," suggesting the agent involved could face charges at a later date if political leadership changes.…

…For anyone watching your show, Jim, there is no absolute immunity. It's untrue. And there is no statute of limitations on murder, by the way," he told Acosta. "And that's something that they should keep in mind because they're not always going to be in power, and we will make the justice system operate on the basis of fairness, justice and truth one day again."…

…Following up on Ellison's assertion, Acosta said, "And if you have to wait until 2029, so be it," seeming to imply that a presidential win for Democrats in 2028 could lead to the agent's prosecution.

"That's what it is, you know what I mean?" Ellison concurred. "There's a reason why a statute of limitations on murder doesn't exist. It's because when you snatch a person's life away, it leaves an indelible print on everyone around them. People can't unsee this."…

https://www.foxnews.com/media/minnesota-ag-says-there-no-statute-limitations-murder-after-fatal-ice-shooting
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Reply Quote
22
2 edits
Slicer97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:58a, 1/16/26
AG
Democrats are repugnant scum and provide zero value to humanity.
Reply Quote
54
rocky the dog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:58a, 1/16/26
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Reply Quote
101
Maroon Dawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:01p, 1/16/26
AG
Honestly

Just ready to declare martial law on Minnesota and round up all these Dems and their minions and toss them into Guantanamo Bay. It's what they're threatening to do the moment they get power again so Eff em you first.
Reply Quote
36
1 edit
Ozzy Osbourne
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Maroon Dawn • 12:04p, 1/16/26
Maroon Dawn said:
Honestly

Just ready to declare martial law on Minnesota and round up all these Dems and their minions and toss them into Guantanamo Bay. It's what they're threatening to do the moment they get power again so Eff em you first.


They already did it to conservatives on Jan 6
Reply Quote
13
BQ_90
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:05p, 1/16/26
AG
Why does a state AG have to wait? I guess i'm unaware that the feds could block a charge brought in state court?
Reply Quote
4
doubledog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:06p, 1/16/26
Lawfare is the Democratic goto.
Reply Quote
7
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:07p, 1/16/26
AG
Ellison is still blowing smoke. Any case he filed would be removed to federal court. And Ellison's best prosecutors (and one in private practice) from the Chauvin cases are now on the bench as their reward. Heaven knows Ellison will not serve as a prosecutor and a federal judge would likely not allow a 14 person prosecution team this time.
Reply Quote
12
YellAg2004
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:07p, 1/16/26
AG
I'm pretty sure it would get removed to federal court and then the DOJ would provide the defense. I think his premise is based on the dems taking the White House in '28 and then refusing to defend the agent. IANAL, so please correct me if I'm off.

If that actually plays out, we truly are a failed nation.
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
The Collective
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:16p, 1/16/26
AG
Supremacy Clause is obvious in this scenario - good lord. Keith might want to request a refund from his law school.
Reply Quote
11
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:25p, 1/16/26

The agent is never being tried in MN for anything. He'll go to a safe state and that state will refuse to extradite him.
Reply Quote
2
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to YellAg2004 • 12:26p, 1/16/26
YellAg2004 said:
I'm pretty sure it would get removed to federal court and then the DOJ would provide the defense. I think his premise is based on the dems taking the White House in '28 and then refusing to defend the agent. IANAL, so please correct me if I'm off.

If that actually plays out, we truly are a failed nation.


Then Trump needs to pardon him on the way out.
Reply Quote
18
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The Collective • 12:26p, 1/16/26
The Collective said:
Supremacy Clause is obvious in this scenario - good lord. Keith might want to request a refund from his law school.


Ellison doesn't give a **** about the law or the constitution; no Dem does anymore.
Reply Quote
10
Old Sarge
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:26p, 1/16/26
AG
There should not be a statute of limitations for being a Communist, either. Or a sympathizer of one.
"Green" is the new RED.
Reply Quote
9
Claude!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:30p, 1/16/26
I'm by no means a cynic, but there appear to me to be some parallels to the late stage Roman Republic, where people like Caesar sought to stay in power at least in part because of the threat of prosecution (or persecution) once their terms were up.
Reply Quote
4
Central Committee
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:35p, 1/16/26
AG
Ellison is communist trash.

He likes to talk Constitution when it suits him, but would have no issue violating it when it doesn't. He has a history of it.
You can't fix stupid.
Reply Quote
7
4stringAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:39p, 1/16/26
AG
Ellison is an impotent **** on this one and he knows it. Still he's broadcasting a potential strategy to try the officer for murder eventually. Trump I suppose could preemptively pardon him if it came to it.

Question for the lawyers: if the DOJ looks at this and refuses to prosecute or indict, is that the end of it? Or could a Dem DOJ in 2029 come in and relook at it and indict him for murder?

Personally, I don't think this officer will ever see a courtroom because this was clear self-defense.

Reply Quote
2
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:41p, 1/16/26
Nothing the AG said isn't already known and has been spread on every social media platform.

To say this is to do nothing more than fan the flames that don't need anymore fanning.

JFC, I've seen on social media that many in government in Minnesota are just waiting until Trump is out of office to do anything regarding ICE and this one agent.

If that's the case then they need to STFU, let ICE do their effing jobs, and move on.

They're making it worse than it needs to be.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Reply Quote
1
Slicer97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Central Committee • 1:42p, 1/16/26
AG
Central Committee said:
Ellison is communist trash.

He likes to talk Constitution when it suits him, but would have no issue violating it when it doesn't. He has a history of it.

Reminds me of a certain DA in Travis county....
Reply Quote
3
fasthorse05
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4stringAg • 1:46p, 1/16/26
To me, you're missing the point, or one of the bigger ones around.

Even if they did choose to indict, and they would in a second, like all of the Republicans in the first Trump term, he'd be looking at $500k minimum in legal fees, more likely $2 million.

The goal isn't always to incarcerate, it's to bleed them dry, break them, and make sure no one ever serves in a Republican administration again.

So you're partially missing the point.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Reply Quote
5
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4stringAg • 1:47p, 1/16/26
AG
4stringAg said:
Ellison is an impotent **** on this one and he knows it. Still he's broadcasting a potential strategy to try the officer for murder eventually. Trump I suppose could preemptively pardon him if it came to it.

Question for the lawyers: if the DOJ looks at this and refuses to prosecute or indict, is that the end of it? Or could a Dem DOJ in 2029 come in and relook at it and indict him for murder?

Personally, I don't think this officer will ever see a courtroom because this was clear self-defense.


I know what should happen but under the current state of lawfare, hard to predict which wild ass hair they may pull out.

Federal officer engaged in federal law enforcement duties, federal law controls and trumps state law. That is what statutory law and SCOTUS precedent say.

In theory could a future version of DOL try to charge him? Yes, unfortunately they could try.
Reply Quote
4
Sid Farkas
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:50p, 1/16/26
AG
Dear AG Bondi,

Please take the gloves off. Tampon Tim, Antifa Ellison and Mayor Soy need to be arrested, Peter Navarro-style and arraigned on charges related to Somali scams by close of business today.

Thank you for your attention to this matter,
- The American People
Reply Quote
12
2 edits
91AggieLawyer
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:50p, 1/16/26
AG
Wait a minute: while I know Minnesota and Texas may have different laws concerning prosecution (state vs. local officials), didn't the left lose their **** when Ken Paxton started talking about the Texas AG's office involving themselves in ANY way in criminal prosecutions?

I don't think their argument was SOLELY statutory based. If Ellison is faced with similar statutory obstacles, is the left going to care here?
Reply Quote
stetson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:01p, 1/16/26
AG
Quote:
Minnesota AG says 'there is no statute of limitations on murder'

What about treason?
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 91AggieLawyer • 3:02p, 1/16/26
AG
91AggieLawyer said:
Wait a minute: while I know Minnesota and Texas may have different laws concerning prosecution (state vs. local officials), didn't the left lose their **** when Ken Paxton started talking about the Texas AG's office involving themselves in ANY way in criminal prosecutions?

I don't think their argument was SOLELY statutory based. If Ellison is faced with similar statutory obstacles, is the left going to care here?

We went through that exercise in the Chauvin case. The first press conference had the Hennepin County Attorney and lawyers from DOJ present. Hennepin County DA said something along the lines of he was looking at potential charges and added, if any. And at the time, DOJ was silent did not contradict nor add their two cents.

That set Ellison off and he took the case away from the Hennepin County DA's office. Apparently under MN law that is allowed. My sense was that law was on the books if a county DA's office was too small, budget restricted or otherwise unable to conduct a prosecution in a big case. So the AG's office, with superior resources, could step in.
Reply Quote
2
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:03p, 1/16/26
AG
Extremely thinly veiled threat to use the legal process to intimidate and abuse citizens for political reasons. That is tyranny. Venue shopping of charges to biased judges and jury pools.

More than anything else, the corruption and functional destruction of our legal system by geographical polarization based on political ideology will bring down the republic. If people begin to believe they cannot get justice or fairness, they will begin to disregard the law, birth criminal and civil, and engage in more selfish or self defensive behaviors.
Reply Quote
6
FobTies
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:50p, 1/16/26
What would infuriate leftists more.

Not charging Ross with a crime?

Charging him with 2nd degree murder, then aquitting?

Charging him with recklessly discharging a firearm, forced retirement with full benefits?
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
InfantryAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FobTies • 9:23p, 1/16/26
AG
FobTies said:
What would infuriate leftists more.

Not charging Ross with a crime?

Charging him with 2nd degree murder, then aquitting?

Charging him with recklessly discharging a firearm, forced retirement with full benefits?

IMO it would ideally go in front of a federal grand jury who would find there is not enough evidence to prosecute.

Then, IMO, it will be easier for him to sue all the media and politicians who called him a murderer. Maybe he can get Nick Sandman's attorney.

If he gets indicted, then I think they have more of a defense. Good question for a civil attorney.
Reply Quote
Zombie Jon Snow
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Logos Stick • 9:24p, 1/16/26
AG
Logos Stick said:
YellAg2004 said:
I'm pretty sure it would get removed to federal court and then the DOJ would provide the defense. I think his premise is based on the dems taking the White House in '28 and then refusing to defend the agent. IANAL, so please correct me if I'm off.

If that actually plays out, we truly are a failed nation.


Then Trump needs to pardon him on the way out.

He 100% will.
Reply Quote
Swan Song
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zombie Jon Snow • 9:27p, 1/16/26
AG
I have a feeling Trump will set the record on pardons, and he should.
Reply Quote
2
Hubert J. Farnsworth
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:55p, 1/16/26
Liberals are trash, along with the "moderates" that defend them. They are no different than the Nazies and communists.
Reply Quote
DannyDuberstein
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:01p, 1/16/26
AG
Seems that a lot more people in Minnesota are begging to get shot
Reply Quote
1
Muy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:02p, 1/16/26
AG
Renee is a lesson, not a martyr. Try and learn this time, you liberal fascists.
Reply Quote
2
FCBlitz
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:30p, 1/16/26
I would love to see Derek Chavin get a full pardon and reimbursement for all of his lost pay and pay for future loss. Help him go live somewhere in anonymity.
Reply Quote
1
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:49a
all of this is allowed to go on. it is all a distraction.

99% of what you see is orchestrated it's all a scam.
Reply Quote
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.