DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

717,896 Views | 7654 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by techno-ag
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

Woman scorned = Woman deported = Angry Woman

I bet you would not feel the same if your daughter was one of those Epstein victims?

My comment was not relative to anyone being an Epstein victim.

Oh I see it just randomly appeared in the Epstein thread? Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you even read the page or so before to gain some form of context?

Please......

Let me help you out, since it's obviously not sinking in…..

The Epstein victim hadn't said squat about Melania until Melania wouldn't intervene in her deportation. She seemed rather angry after being deported and scorned. Now let's see what this information is……. More ritualistic child sacrifices? More cannibalism? More bodies on a Trump golf course? There are so many ridiculous (and sometimes impossible) accusations out there that getting to any concrete prosecutable evidence seems like a pipe dream.

What is not setting in is why posters like you seem totally fine with the truth not being disclosed on these pedophiles.

What "truth"? What is it that you just know is in there and what evidence surrounding it is prosecutable?

What I do believe is that there is no way that there was this elaborate set up with multiple locations, involving multiple underaged girls and multiple pics of famous/rich people to think that only two people are guilty. To think otherwise would be purely asinine.

I said no such thing regarding only two people being guilty. Once again, there needs to be evidence sufficient to
prosecute. This is far too convoluted a situation to go hurling "Pedo!" accusations at everyone who ever had any picture taken with Epstein or attended more than one function with him within 100 yards. Let's get real witnesses on the stand and weigh the validity of their testimony.

Well it's kind of hard to get the evidence when our current administration seems to be going to great lengths to keep it hidden. I'd absolutely love to read the testimony from those victims. Unless maybe you think there were no victims?

WTF? Exactly what have I said to lead you to believe I would think there were no victims? Once again, let's get real witnesses on the stand and weigh the validity of their testimony.

Yes. That is the whole point. But it doesn't seem to be happening. Plenty of victims out there willing to do it.
AuditAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Im Gipper said:

ETFan said:

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-promises-mass-pardons-to-staff-before-leaving-office-d7274d32?mod=e2tw

Well duh.


Wonder where he learned that?

That was (D)ifferent.

If doing drugs and having guns is a crime to go down for, there are a lot of right-wing podcasters who would also fit that bill. I think most agree it's a pretty far gap from pedophilia. Which is a crime you actually have to worry about with this admin.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDev01 said:

bobbranco said:


Don't put words in peoples mouth.

It's disgusting.


It is strange that you say this given the number of baseless accusations of antisemitism you routinely throw around. Maybe you should consider your own advice when it comes to people's thoughts and motivations.


I'm sorry its not the Jews its the Zionists. Is that how it works?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

Woman scorned = Woman deported = Angry Woman

I bet you would not feel the same if your daughter was one of those Epstein victims?

My comment was not relative to anyone being an Epstein victim.

Oh I see it just randomly appeared in the Epstein thread? Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you even read the page or so before to gain some form of context?

Please......

Let me help you out, since it's obviously not sinking in…..

The Epstein victim hadn't said squat about Melania until Melania wouldn't intervene in her deportation. She seemed rather angry after being deported and scorned. Now let's see what this information is……. More ritualistic child sacrifices? More cannibalism? More bodies on a Trump golf course? There are so many ridiculous (and sometimes impossible) accusations out there that getting to any concrete prosecutable evidence seems like a pipe dream.

What is not setting in is why posters like you seem totally fine with the truth not being disclosed on these pedophiles.


Don't put words in peoples mouth.

It's disgusting.

Whatever dude


Not defending the pederasts/pedophiles. Nor looking to hide any dirt on them. Try better.

But certainly not going to condemn anyone based on unvetted accusations from FBI tiplines.

Epstein, Maxwell, the Prince, the Frenchman, maybe the Ohio billionaire can be easily condemned. If others can be prosecuted good.

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

Woman scorned = Woman deported = Angry Woman

I bet you would not feel the same if your daughter was one of those Epstein victims?

My comment was not relative to anyone being an Epstein victim.

Oh I see it just randomly appeared in the Epstein thread? Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you even read the page or so before to gain some form of context?

Please......

Let me help you out, since it's obviously not sinking in…..

The Epstein victim hadn't said squat about Melania until Melania wouldn't intervene in her deportation. She seemed rather angry after being deported and scorned. Now let's see what this information is……. More ritualistic child sacrifices? More cannibalism? More bodies on a Trump golf course? There are so many ridiculous (and sometimes impossible) accusations out there that getting to any concrete prosecutable evidence seems like a pipe dream.

What is not setting in is why posters like you seem totally fine with the truth not being disclosed on these pedophiles.

What "truth"? What is it that you just know is in there and what evidence surrounding it is prosecutable?

What I do believe is that there is no way that there was this elaborate set up with multiple locations, involving multiple underaged girls and multiple pics of famous/rich people to think that only two people are guilty. To think otherwise would be purely asinine.

I said no such thing regarding only two people being guilty. Once again, there needs to be evidence sufficient to
prosecute. This is far too convoluted a situation to go hurling "Pedo!" accusations at everyone who ever had any picture taken with Epstein or attended more than one function with him within 100 yards. Let's get real witnesses on the stand and weigh the validity of their testimony.

Well it's kind of hard to get the evidence when our current administration seems to be going to great lengths to keep it hidden. I'd absolutely love to read the testimony from those victims. Unless maybe you think there were no victims?

WTF? Exactly what have I said to lead you to believe I would think there were no victims? Once again, let's get real witnesses on the stand and weigh the validity of their testimony.

Yes. That is the whole point. But it doesn't seem to be happening. Plenty of victims out there willing to do it.

They aren't.
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

Woman scorned = Woman deported = Angry Woman

I bet you would not feel the same if your daughter was one of those Epstein victims?

My comment was not relative to anyone being an Epstein victim.

Oh I see it just randomly appeared in the Epstein thread? Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you even read the page or so before to gain some form of context?

Please......

Let me help you out, since it's obviously not sinking in…..

The Epstein victim hadn't said squat about Melania until Melania wouldn't intervene in her deportation. She seemed rather angry after being deported and scorned. Now let's see what this information is……. More ritualistic child sacrifices? More cannibalism? More bodies on a Trump golf course? There are so many ridiculous (and sometimes impossible) accusations out there that getting to any concrete prosecutable evidence seems like a pipe dream.

What is not setting in is why posters like you seem totally fine with the truth not being disclosed on these pedophiles.


Don't put words in peoples mouth.

It's disgusting.

Whatever dude


Not defending the pederasts/pedophiles. Nor looking to hide any dirt on them. Try better.

But certainly not going to condemn anyone based on unvetted accusations from FBI tiplines.

Epstein, Maxwell, the Prince, the Frenchman, maybe the Ohio billionaire can be easily condemned. If others can be prosecuted good.



Just release all the files and it can be put to rest
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

AgDev01 said:

bobbranco said:


Don't put words in peoples mouth.

It's disgusting.


It is strange that you say this given the number of baseless accusations of antisemitism you routinely throw around. Maybe you should consider your own advice when it comes to people's thoughts and motivations.


I'm sorry its not the Jews its the Zionists. Is that how it works?


It how what works? It seems clear you are unable to take your own advice and in turn should not be taken seriously.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDev01 said:

bobbranco said:

AgDev01 said:

bobbranco said:


Don't put words in peoples mouth.

It's disgusting.


It is strange that you say this given the number of baseless accusations of antisemitism you routinely throw around. Maybe you should consider your own advice when it comes to people's thoughts and motivations.


I'm sorry its not the Jews its the Zionists. Is that how it works?


It how what works? It seems clear you are unable to take your own advice and in turn should not be taken seriously.

I don't take you seriously.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Expected retort from someone who is incapable of engaging in honest discussion.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

B-1 83 said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

docb said:

bobbranco said:

Woman scorned = Woman deported = Angry Woman

I bet you would not feel the same if your daughter was one of those Epstein victims?

My comment was not relative to anyone being an Epstein victim.

Oh I see it just randomly appeared in the Epstein thread? Thanks for clearing that up.

Did you even read the page or so before to gain some form of context?

Please......

Let me help you out, since it's obviously not sinking in…..

The Epstein victim hadn't said squat about Melania until Melania wouldn't intervene in her deportation. She seemed rather angry after being deported and scorned. Now let's see what this information is……. More ritualistic child sacrifices? More cannibalism? More bodies on a Trump golf course? There are so many ridiculous (and sometimes impossible) accusations out there that getting to any concrete prosecutable evidence seems like a pipe dream.

What is not setting in is why posters like you seem totally fine with the truth not being disclosed on these pedophiles.


Don't put words in peoples mouth.

It's disgusting.

Whatever dude


Not defending the pederasts/pedophiles. Nor looking to hide any dirt on them. Try better.

But certainly not going to condemn anyone based on unvetted accusations from FBI tiplines.

Epstein, Maxwell, the Prince, the Frenchman, maybe the Ohio billionaire can be easily condemned. If others can be prosecuted good.



Just release all the files and it can be put to rest


Do it. Dig through it all. Catalog every word and index it. Curate it for evidence. I don't care. I hope after the complete release it can be utilized as evidence.

Wake me up when you convict somebody.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDev01 said:

Expected retort from someone who is incapable of engaging in honest discussion.

I'm honest. You don't appreciate my honesty.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Blondi failed to show up, another easy win for the Dems because this administration pulled a Sumlin and blew the easiest win of all time

PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Blondi failed to show up, another easy win for the Dems because this administration pulled a Sumlin and blew the easiest win of all time



Holding Pam Bondi in contempt of Congress would be so hilarious. Would be a rare Democrat W
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hold her binder distributing ass in contempt.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

No. 1 The guy was clearly a scumbag

No 2 He clearly had connections to intelligence services both inside the United States and outside the United States and also with a lot of wealthy and powerful people


At least someone admits it.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"I haven't seen it," is my favorite MAGA excuse for avoiding accountability.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?


spoiler alert.


there won't be any real follow up. There was "insufficient evidence" on this person
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harry Fisch

https://www.cornellsun.com/article/2026/02/gifts-dinners-deals-justice-department-files-reveal-epstein-s-ties-to-multiple-weill-cornell-doctors

I'm Gipper
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Video description does not describe JD's reply.

It's more gaslighting.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

Video description does not describe JD's reply.

It's more gaslighting.


Nah gaslighting is trying to tell us "h-he didn't mean the whole thing is a hoax".

I think Vance is just as pissed as the rest of us for how this release was handled but he has to go along with it as VP.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

bobbranco said:

Video description does not describe JD's reply.

It's more gaslighting.


Nah gaslighting is trying to tell us "h-he didn't mean the whole thing is a hoax".

I think Vance is just as pissed as the rest of us for how this release was handled but he has to go along with it as VP.

WRONG.

You are more aligned with Eric than anyone else.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kash-patel-calls-bullst-swalwell-heated-exchange-over-epstein-files
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

PaulsBunions said:

bobbranco said:

Video description does not describe JD's reply.

It's more gaslighting.


Nah gaslighting is trying to tell us "h-he didn't mean the whole thing is a hoax".

I think Vance is just as pissed as the rest of us for how this release was handled but he has to go along with it as VP.

WRONG.

You are more aligned with Eric than anyone else.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kash-patel-calls-bullst-swalwell-heated-exchange-over-epstein-files


"You're wrong and aligned with Eric Swalwell because.... heres an 8 month old fox news article"

Thanks for the useless non sequitur lol
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

bobbranco said:

PaulsBunions said:

bobbranco said:

Video description does not describe JD's reply.

It's more gaslighting.


Nah gaslighting is trying to tell us "h-he didn't mean the whole thing is a hoax".

I think Vance is just as pissed as the rest of us for how this release was handled but he has to go along with it as VP.

WRONG.

You are more aligned with Eric than anyone else.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kash-patel-calls-bullst-swalwell-heated-exchange-over-epstein-files


"You're wrong and aligned with Eric Swalwell because.... heres an 8 month old fox news article"

Thanks for the useless non sequitur lol

Quite apropos.

Quote:

Swalwell, one of several Democrats to grill Patel over the Department of Justice's handling of the files, demanded the director tell him about any mention of President Donald Trump in them. Patel was not receptive to Swalwell's line of questioning, leading to a profanity-laced back-and-forth.

"Your fixation on this matter and baseless accusations that I'm hiding child pedophiles is disgusting," Patel said.

PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

PaulsBunions said:

bobbranco said:

PaulsBunions said:

bobbranco said:

Video description does not describe JD's reply.

It's more gaslighting.


Nah gaslighting is trying to tell us "h-he didn't mean the whole thing is a hoax".

I think Vance is just as pissed as the rest of us for how this release was handled but he has to go along with it as VP.

WRONG.

You are more aligned with Eric than anyone else.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kash-patel-calls-bullst-swalwell-heated-exchange-over-epstein-files


"You're wrong and aligned with Eric Swalwell because.... heres an 8 month old fox news article"

Thanks for the useless non sequitur lol

Quite apropos.

Quote:

Swalwell, one of several Democrats to grill Patel over the Department of Justice's handling of the files, demanded the director tell him about any mention of President Donald Trump in them. Patel was not receptive to Swalwell's line of questioning, leading to a profanity-laced back-and-forth.

"Your fixation on this matter and baseless accusations that I'm hiding child pedophiles is disgusting," Patel said.




Cool, I really don't care at all about Swalwell's opinion on anything, and seeing as the DOJ is still not in compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act passed almost half a year ago its only fair to assume they are protecting pedophiles. Thanks for trying to paint everybody who disagrees with you with a broad brush I'm sure that leads to excellent political discourse.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gold from the humor thread.

Prosperdick said:


The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
First Page Refresh
Page 219 of 219
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.