Tina Peters convicted in election interference case

13,277 Views | 103 Replies | Last: 10 days ago by aggiehawg
Opalka
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:24a, 8/13/24
AG
Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html

Reply Quote
31
Eso si, Que es
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Opalka • 9:25a, 8/13/24
Good, everyone who cheats the ballot box should be prosecuted.

This person cheated the ballot box right?
Reply Quote
84
TexasAGGIEinAR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Opalka • 9:26a, 8/13/24
Opalka said:
Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html



Democrats are all guilty of it. They just won't admit to it. They then claim profiling, racism or bullying. Lather, rinse, repeat. Republicans actually get punished for doing wrong, Democrats don't. See the acting President. Or any criminal in a Democratic run city.
Reply Quote
82
DallasAg 94
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Opalka • 9:27a, 8/13/24
Reply Quote
88
1 edit
girlfriend_experience
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:29a, 8/13/24
But but liberals tell me there is no voter fraud at all
Reply Quote
42
DallasAg 94
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Opalka • 9:29a, 8/13/24
Reply Quote
80
1 edit
jteAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DallasAg 94 • 9:30a, 8/13/24
DallasAg 94 said:
Democrats don't prosecute themselves, they only go after Republicans.

So... yes, it is the Republicans that get held accountable. Democrats are not held accountable. And you celebrate that?!



And the sad part is… you actually believe this!
Bless your heart!
Reply Quote
13
well_endowed_ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:30a, 8/13/24
The difference is that Republicans are fine with other Republicans being prosecuted because Republicans actually want fair elections. Democrats, whose cheating is far more pervasive, will protect other Democrats at all costs because they don't believe in fair elections. You think this is a gotcha. It's not. Everybody who screws with the election process should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Reply Quote
62
well_endowed_ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jteAg • 9:31a, 8/13/24
jteAg said:
DallasAg 94 said:
Democrats don't prosecute themselves, they only go after Republicans.

So... yes, it is the Republicans that get held accountable. Democrats are not held accountable. And you celebrate that?!



And the sad part is… you actually believe this!
Bless your heart!

You live in an alternate distorted reality. I hope you realize it before you vote in an authoritarian regime.
Reply Quote
33
aggiedent
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:31a, 8/13/24
AG
I would expect that if I stole a county officials security/ID badge and allowed an individual without clearance to access the hard drive of the county voting machines, I'd be in jail too. Republican or Democrat.
Reply Quote
9
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:32a, 8/13/24
AG
Very sad, apparently another show trial. She was convicted for not hiding/destroying evidence of voter fraud. Gold star navy seal mom.





Wasn't allowed to present a defense. Pathetic.
Reply Quote
53
AgNav93
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DallasAg 94 • 9:34a, 8/13/24
AG
DallasAg 94 said:
Election interference?!

Quote:
Prosecutors alleged that Peters stole a county employee's security badge to help a man associated with MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell gain access to the county's voter systems to assist Lindell's false conspiracies about the validity of the 2020 election results.

She gained access to election results... post-election. She didn't interfere in the election. Democrat powers were keeping 3rd party auditing of results. She broke the law in how she provided access to information about the election.

HTH.

Exactly. If democrats were so squeaky clean why do they fight tooth and nail to prevent any kind of audits after an election?
Reply Quote
36
Gigem314
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DallasAg 94 • 9:35a, 8/13/24
AG
Quote:
She gained access to election results... post-election. She didn't interfere in the election. Democrat powers were keeping 3rd party auditing of results. She broke the law in how she provided access to information about the election.
I mean, the OP is dumb enough to think Democrats never cheat and only Republicans do...so it's not a stretch to believe OP missed the details on this either.
Reply Quote
55
oh no
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:35a, 8/13/24
AG
anyone who tried to gain access to investigate machines for nefarious activity and security gaps after the election is being relentlessly tried and convicted in democrat-run cities. so there: BAM! that is just more proof that the election was the most secure election evvvaar and there was no fraud.
Reply Quote
28
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:37a, 8/13/24
AG
Dominion deleted election results from the 2020 election as part of their "Trusted Build" so-called upgrade in spring 2021. She had a forensic copy made before and after the install that proved that. Dominion broke the laws on election data retention when they deleted it.
Reply Quote
54
1 edit
GigEmForever
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:38a, 8/13/24
Heard could be sentenced to 20 years in prison! Fantastic! Nothing worse than a corrupt election worker--keep your ears to the ground, eyes open & report ANYTHING to the Fed FBI!
Reply Quote
2
policywonk98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:38a, 8/13/24
AG
I don't condone illegal behavior of any kind no matter who is doing it. But allowing people unauthorized access to equipment to prove that the equipment is set up to commit fraud is not the same as committing voter fraud.

Here is a database of over 1,500 cases, cases where people actually committed voter fraud.

Do you wonder why Yahoo News hasn't reported on these cases? They are all public record. Heritage has even done the work for news organizations to search the database and report on the cases. Lots of democrats can be found in this database.

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search

Statistically speaking a very small percentage of illegal behavior is ever discovered much less investigated and convicted.

1,546 is only the tip of the iceberg. Suggesting there is not that much voter fraud is like suggesting that the only people doing illegal drugs in the country are the ones in jail for doing illegal drugs. The only people speeding on our roadways are the ones that get speeding tickets. The only people cheating on their spouses are the ones that have gotten caught. The only ones cheating on the test are the ones that have gotten caught.

The whole idea is ludicrous. Of course there is voter fraud. The question is are we going to make it easier for voter fraud to occur or harder? If we are not going to make it harder, why? Why should it not be harder to commit voter fraud? That's the only question that matters.
Reply Quote
34
Kashchei
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:42a, 8/13/24
AG
O/U the number of times the OP replies to this thread: 0.5

Smells like another drive-by lib post
Reply Quote
32
Gigem314
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to policywonk98 • 9:43a, 8/13/24
AG
policywonk98 said:
1,546 is only the tip of the iceberg. Suggesting there is not that much voter fraud is like suggesting that the only people doing illegal drugs in the country are the ones in jail for doing illegal drugs. The only people speeding on our roadways are the ones that get speeding tickets. The only people cheating on their spouses are the ones that have gotten caught. The only ones cheating on the test are the ones that have gotten caught.
Good analogy.

Voter fraud happens all the time and happened long before the 2020 election. The difference is lawmakers in certain states have made it easier for fraud to occur.
Reply Quote
6
deddog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Opalka • 9:48a, 8/13/24
AG
Opalka said:
Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html

So is there voter fraud or not?
You'd think you'd want voter IDs and paper ballots after this, right??
Reply Quote
8
1 edit
oh no
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:05a, 8/13/24
AG
You can't vouch tallied votes back to legitimate registered voters. You can't trace legitimate registered voters to the final tallied results. The chain of custody of mailed out ballots cannot ever be traced. The system is not forensically auditable, intentionally.

Democrats fight tooth and nail against any attempt at forensic audits. They fight tooth and nail against common-sense anti-fraud controls like an ID that proves the person voting is the person who is registered to vote. They fight tooth and nail against scrubbing and refreshing registration rolls and now even a basic requirement to register - being a citizen.

They prosecute anyone suspicious about the coding, connectivity, and vulnerability in the systems.

In addition to Tina Peters, there's a local guy in GA who is part of Trump's RICO case because he tried to let some attorneys look at a machine after the election.

Tina broke a law and will be punished, but how in the world does OP equate what she was trying to do- protect evidence of fraud after the election - to actual voter fraud or election interference and have the nerve to say that it's the republicans who cheat?
Reply Quote
19
AgGrad99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:11a, 8/13/24
AG
There are typically two sides.

One fights against voter identification, redundancies, polling location monitoring and investigations to insure accurate elections.

One fights for voter identification, redundances, polling location monitoring and investigations to insure accurate elections.

Nothing more needs to be said, and trying to make an argument about who's in the wrong, is a fool's errand.
Reply Quote
19
TyHolden
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:13a, 8/13/24
AG
We are basically Venezuela. We're just better at hiding it.
I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
Reply Quote
12
BusterAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:15a, 8/13/24
AG
This is terrible. I demand immediate action:

1) universal voter ID laws
2) 100% paper ballot requirements
3) an auditable voting system, where it can be verified that each vote came from the universe of registered voters, and it can be verified which registered voters voted.

That will stop all of those damn Republicans from cheating! We need this implemented NOW!
Reply Quote
21
1 edit
torrid
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:16a, 8/13/24
AG
Quote:
Drake argued Peters was "fixated" on a desire to be a "hero" and to impress Lindell, one of the most notable election-denying conspiracy theorists.
Would seem to form a good basis for an insanity plea.
Reply Quote
2
oh no
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TyHolden • 10:17a, 8/13/24
AG
TyHolden said:
We are basically Venezuela. We're just better at hiding it.
I don't think we are. We aren't about to Maduro this next election. Maduro Biden'ed his last one.
Reply Quote
2
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:18a, 8/13/24
AG
It only took one election in 2004, to essentially kill Diebold electronic voting system using non auditable DREs.

The issues with Dominion have continued yet they are still in business and control 40% of that market.
Reply Quote
8
TxSquarebody
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jteAg • 10:19a, 8/13/24
jteAg said:
DallasAg 94 said:
Democrats don't prosecute themselves, they only go after Republicans.

So... yes, it is the Republicans that get held accountable. Democrats are not held accountable. And you celebrate that?!



And the sad part is… you actually believe this!
Bless your heart!

Dim DOJ won't prosecute PeePaw because he's too senile...so tell us, when do the dims hold their own accountable?
Reply Quote
3
Ag-Yoakum95
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Opalka • 10:23a, 8/13/24
AG
Opalka said:
Here's another republican who tried to interfere in the last election. Republicans keep trying to say democrats cheated, but time and time again, it's always a republican that is found guilty of it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-colorado-clerk-tina-peters-023311840.html



Hello, Kamala!
Reply Quote
6
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:24a, 8/13/24
AG
Thread did not go the way OP hoped it would
Reply Quote
13
Ag-Yoakum95
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jteAg • 10:24a, 8/13/24
AG
jteAg said:
DallasAg 94 said:
Democrats don't prosecute themselves, they only go after Republicans.

So... yes, it is the Republicans that get held accountable. Democrats are not held accountable. And you celebrate that?!



And the sad part is… you actually believe this!
Bless your heart!


What's not true about what he stated?
Reply Quote
7
jeremy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jteAg • 10:27a, 8/13/24
AG
jteAg said:
DallasAg 94 said:
Democrats don't prosecute themselves, they only go after Republicans.

So... yes, it is the Republicans that get held accountable. Democrats are not held accountable. And you celebrate that?!



And the sad part is… you actually believe this!
Bless your heart!


So democrats don't constantly get away with breaking the law!!?
Reply Quote
8
jrdaustin
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:36a, 8/13/24
AG
Convicted for preserving evidence after an election.

And OP calls this election interference?

Good lord.
Reply Quote
29
1 edit
oh no
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 11:38a, 8/13/24
AG
captkirk said:
Thread did not go the way OP hoped it would
i think it went exactly the way OP knew it would.

look at all the well-thought out replies and back-and-forth discussion with the OP of this discussion topic. oh wait, no, it was a drive by troll post with zero responses from the OP.
Reply Quote
5
The Beef01
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oh no • 12:09p, 8/13/24
AG
oh no said:
You can't vouch tallied votes back to legitimate registered voters. You can't trace legitimate registered voters to the final tallied results. The chain of custody of mailed out ballots cannot ever be traced. The system is not forensically auditable, intentionally.

Democrats fight tooth and nail against any attempt at forensic audits. They fight tooth and nail against common-sense anti-fraud controls like an ID that proves the person voting is the person who is registered to vote. They fight tooth and nail against scrubbing and refreshing registration rolls and now even a basic requirement to register - being a citizen.

They prosecute anyone suspicious about the coding, connectivity, and vulnerability in the systems.

In addition to Tina Peters, there's a local guy in GA who is part of Trump's RICO case because he tried to let some attorneys look at a machine after the election.

Tina broke a law and will be punished, but how in the world does OP equate what she was trying to do- protect evidence of fraud after the election - to actual voter fraud or election interference and have the nerve to say that it's the republicans who cheat?
The irony being that if current left gets their entire way...eventually, they would ademately push for every measure of transparency behind-the-scenes b/c they'd control the entire chain and would then have a ready made list of enemies who oppose them.

Look no further than the unions and their disdain for the secret ballot...they'll provide all manner of justification for what they're wanting to do, but it ultimately comes down to the union heads want to know who their enemies are and punish accordingly.
Reply Quote
1
Last Page
Page 1 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.