I havent been paying close attention to walsche, but from what I have seen, it is very obvious how differently they treated this case and the Read case.

She's going to smoke them all in her civil suit.

Nick Guarino tells the jurors in the Brian Walshe trial that the “last visited date/time” is the “last time the user last accessed the website”

Thanks for confirming Jen McCabe googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am, Nick 👍🏼 pic.twitter.com/lXDK91iquf

— Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe) (@factsdontlie10) December 2, 2025

Brian Walshe was found guilty of first degree murder, in less than 6 hours. Already talking appeal. Maybe Proctor will have to testify in that one.

MsDoubleD81 said:

---

Brian Walshe was found guilty of first degree murder, in less than 6 hours. Already talking appeal. Maybe Proctor will have to testify in that one.

---

Yeah, really clear that he had killed her and I was somewhat shocked he didnt testify.

I do think he may have decent appeals grounds, better than most anyway, which means the odds are massively stacked against him and he won't prevail.

The big issue is the internet searches. When police asked for his phone, they said they wanted to see his messages with Ana and we later found out there were no problems with their messages together. Everything basically normal in their texts together.

Brian's attorney drafted an agreement that they could obtain his texts between him and Ana, but that was the extent.

Without a warrant, they went ahead and searched everything, beyond what was agreed to. They didn't have the probable cause to get a warrant.

So it kind of falls under the "bad guy doctrine" of "Yeah he did it, so it is ok." But the searches probably should have been disallowed because he didn't agree to them and they didn't have a warrant.

Either way, Brian Walshe in jail forever is the right thing, because I don't think there is any doubt he killed and dismembered her. But I also don't like cops like Proctor trampling on the 4th Amendment.

Here is Canton Police Sgt Sean Goode's suspension letter as obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad.

It was hand delivered to Goode in late October.

Goode's suspension is believed to be linked to communications found on former trooper Michael Proctor's phone. The investigation ongoing.… pic.twitter.com/GF4P89FVhb

— Ted Daniel (@TedDanielnews) December 15, 2025

Guitarsoup said:

---

Gator92 said:

---

Quote:

---

Yeah, as I have said over and over, he seems to be acting like a defense attorney trying to poke holes in Karen's case rather than proving his own. Just like with the phone search.

---

Yes you have.

Have you ever thought he was brought in to protect the McAlberts and McCabes?

If the defense is proposing alternate theories, wouldn't you counter those w/ reasonable doubt?

---

Man, I just don't know how you blow a million dollars plus on this retrial just to protect the McAlberts.

How Morrissey has handled this will probably cost him reelection next year.

I think they got Hank because no prosecutors in the office agreed to do it and they needed someone with questionable morals like we saw on full display today.

There have been a lot of cops that have been arrested by the Feds over the last couple years in that county and I would bet there are some more this summer because of this, the Walshe case, and the Sandra Birchmore case.

Birchmore was killed a couple days after John. All the same cast of characters. Guess what... they ignored evidence to protect a cop that killed her. Trooper Guarino also did the cell phone extractions in that case (like in Karen's case) and he somehow missed 32,000 texts between Sandra Birchmore and the cop that killed her.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Sandra_Birchmore

---

https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/matthew-farwell-wont-face-death-penalty-in-sandra-birchmore-case/3857910/

Update from 12/9 on this:

Quote:

---

Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell will not face the death penalty in connection with the Sandra Birchmore case.

Federal prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed the government not to seek the death penalty in this case. The judge had given prosecutors until Jan. 20, 2026 to decide if they would seek the death penalty.

Farwell is charged with killing Birchmore and her unborn child, accused of strangling her and staging her death to look like a suicide.

The 23-year-old Birchmore was found dead in her Canton apartment back in 2021. She was three months pregnant.

Farwell is accused of initiating a relationship with Birchmore when she was 15 years old and he was 26. He resigned from the Stoughton Police Department in 2022.

He has pleaded not guilty in connection with Birchmore's death.

---

Karen Read SUV Live Auction
2021 Lexus LX 570 – Only 12,000+/- mi.
Friday, January 30, 2026 @ 11am
Location: TBA

More info: https://t.co/Q2UpyfB1mA pic.twitter.com/DAmqrkSO09

— JJManningAuctioneers (@ManningAuctions) January 5, 2026

nice car
assume it was restored based on the pics

https://t.co/zmMgNalF1A pic.twitter.com/5YJ2Y9VJF8

— The Read Files (@TheReadFiles) January 8, 2026

Anyone watched the Lifetime movie? YouTube TV doesn't have Lifetime.

MsDoubleD81 said:

---

Anyone watched the Lifetime movie? YouTube TV doesn't have Lifetime.

---

The comments on it are pretty funny. I haven't seen it and won't watch it just because I know it is trash that was filmed in like a week. I don't think the pro Karen people are mad at it and it doesn't really get into the Alberts much

Keri Roberts did not infact get Sandra Bullock to play her like she hoped.

Here is the link to the Lifetime channel. It sucked and Turtleboy looks anorexic!

https://play.mylifetime.com/movies/accused-the-karen-read-story/full-movie

"The Trial Channel" has been using AI to add in the sidebars that have now been released.

Couple observations:

1. Judge Cannone is the only reason these trials were close. She blocked sooo much stuff from coming in under her crazy rules.

2. The Alberts are all liars, from the parents to the kids. I think simply playing their testimony may convince enough people on the civil side to find them guilty. They were absolutely hiding something.

AgLiving06 said:

---

"The Trial Channel" has been using AI to add in the sidebars that have now been released.

Couple observations:

1. Judge Cannone is the only reason these trials were close. She blocked sooo much stuff from coming in under her crazy rules.

2. The Alberts are all liars, from the parents to the kids. I think simply playing their testimony may convince enough people on the civil side to find them guilty. They were absolutely hiding something.

---

She was sustaining objections that Lally didn't even make! It is absolutely wild. She's blocking things that Lally didn't object to coming in. There should be some sort of penalty available for her.

BREAKING NEWS:

After "someone" turned over 13 years of Michael Proctor's cellphone to the Norfolk DA in the fall of 2025, causing Proctor to drop the appeal of his discharge from the State Police, the Norfolk DA gave Proctor back the phone.

Then Prctor "lost it" and now can't… pic.twitter.com/nXwEkVT1TP

— Grant Smith Ellis (@GrantSmithEllis) February 3, 2026

What a clown show

UGH!

https://www.masslive.com/news/2026/02/lawyers-spar-over-inadvertent-reply-all-from-karen-read-in-wrongful-death-suit.html

MsDoubleD81 said:

---

UGH!

https://www.masslive.com/news/2026/02/lawyers-spar-over-inadvertent-reply-all-from-karen-read-in-wrongful-death-suit.html

---

LawTube seems to think that the plaintiff's attorneys are acting unethically and that there is another case identical in Mass where the same thing happened and the judge kept it out. Karens' attorneys did everything they could to mitigate it when it happened within an hour.

Makes me wonder what she said that would be different from her previous statements.

Quote:

---

Lawyers for Karen Read are trying to force lawyers representing the family of her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O'Keefe, in the wrongful death lawsuit she faces to destroy an email message she inadvertently copied them on in December.


Read hit "reply all" on an email her lawyers sent to lawyers for O'Keefe's family on Dec. 16, 2025, meaning her message went to not just her attorneys but everyone included on the email thread. Lawyers for Read claim the message constitutes a privileged attorney-client communication. They asked lawyers for the O'Keefes to delete the message less than an hour after it was sent.

---

Ooof! She's the client who can waive attorney client privilege (and people often do inadvertently) OTOH hand, attorneys always have the disclaimer if a message is received in error, please delete, yada yada.

Up to the judge to decide this one.

At least she didn't do this on the criminal trial.

MsDoubleD81 said:

---

At least she didn't do this on the criminal trial.

---

I sat for civil deposition for three days. I knew enough to ask counsel, "Can I answer that?" But i knew that to stop and ask.

Well well well, would you look at that. Nick Rocco (worked with Karen's team) said he has never heard any of this. So brady violations.

One could write a dissertation on the evidentiary value of this clip alone.

Consider the value of contemporaneous corroboration.

Recall the contrary testimony.

Wonder why you haven’t heard this before.#FKR https://t.co/ZB2RJzBANB pic.twitter.com/PWrSxNKfSP

— Marbury v. Mad (@Marbury_v_Mad) February 14, 2026

Dever to the ME’s office at 9:55am on 1/29/2022:

“No idea if he just fell, if he was struck by a plow, [the circumstances] are still completely unknown.”

Anyone ever heard this before? pic.twitter.com/5Nv3H54ZWg

— Marbury v. Mad (@Marbury_v_Mad) February 14, 2026

Loophole Lawyer has graciously offered to host the files as they download at this link - they will be updating throughout the night, he says:https://t.co/sUd9DYceyM

Follow him on YouTube to say thanks!!! https://t.co/CydW3w55yL

— Marbury v. Mad (@Marbury_v_Mad) February 13, 2026

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00083270.pdf

Michael Morrissey was in the Epstein files for protecting Epstein's pedo friends.

And Karen gets all of Proctor's phone extractions.

Karen Read wins AGAIN 🎉

Well well well… after all that sanctimonious outrage over “privacy” and “fishing expeditions,” Superior Court judge Doolin just ordered that Michael Proctor’s personal cell phone extraction be turned over to all parties in the O'Keefe vs Read / Canton… pic.twitter.com/GclaXaCb9x

— BoozeyBeauty (@BoozeyBeauty) February 27, 2026